双向FDI的协调发展能否促进碳减排?来自中国工业部门的证据

IF 2.2 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of International Trade & Economic Development Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.1080/09638199.2023.2275162
Yi Qiu, Hui Hu, Jianjun Wu
{"title":"双向FDI的协调发展能否促进碳减排?来自中国工业部门的证据","authors":"Yi Qiu, Hui Hu, Jianjun Wu","doi":"10.1080/09638199.2023.2275162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn this study, the panel data of 34 industrial sectors are selected from 2004 to 2019 in China and empirically tested the carbon emission reduction effect and its transmission path during the coordinated development of two-way FDI. The results show that the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China's industrial sector had a significant but heterogeneous carbon emission reduction effect. The coordinated development of two-way FDI in high-yield scale groups, low-energy-consumption industries and high-tech industries had a stronger inhibitory effect on carbon emissions. When the coordinated development level of two-way FDI in China's industrial sector was high, its carbon emission reduction effect was more significant. After the Belt and Road Initiative was put forward in 2013, the carbon emission reduction effect of the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China's industrial industry was stronger. The mechanism test results showed that the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China's industrial sector mainly affected domestic carbon emissions through three transmission paths: scale, structure, and technology effects. Of these, the scale effect was positive, and the structure and technology effects were negative.KEYWORDS: Coordinated development of two-way FDIcarbon emission reductionsimultaneous equation modelsChina's industrial sectorsJEL Classifications: A10A1A Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Credit author statementAll the authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection and analysis were performed by Y.Q., H.H. and J.W. The first draft of the manuscript was written by H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.Data availabilityData will be made available on request.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Hunan Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Planning Fund under Grant number 21ZDAJ007 and Collaborative Innovation Center for Emissions Trading system Co-constructed by the Province and Ministry under Grant number 22CICETS-ZD010 and 22CICETS-YB027.","PeriodicalId":51656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Trade & Economic Development","volume":"275 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the coordinated development of two-way FDI promote carbon emission reduction? Evidence from industrial sectors in China\",\"authors\":\"Yi Qiu, Hui Hu, Jianjun Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638199.2023.2275162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractIn this study, the panel data of 34 industrial sectors are selected from 2004 to 2019 in China and empirically tested the carbon emission reduction effect and its transmission path during the coordinated development of two-way FDI. The results show that the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China's industrial sector had a significant but heterogeneous carbon emission reduction effect. The coordinated development of two-way FDI in high-yield scale groups, low-energy-consumption industries and high-tech industries had a stronger inhibitory effect on carbon emissions. When the coordinated development level of two-way FDI in China's industrial sector was high, its carbon emission reduction effect was more significant. After the Belt and Road Initiative was put forward in 2013, the carbon emission reduction effect of the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China's industrial industry was stronger. The mechanism test results showed that the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China's industrial sector mainly affected domestic carbon emissions through three transmission paths: scale, structure, and technology effects. Of these, the scale effect was positive, and the structure and technology effects were negative.KEYWORDS: Coordinated development of two-way FDIcarbon emission reductionsimultaneous equation modelsChina's industrial sectorsJEL Classifications: A10A1A Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Credit author statementAll the authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection and analysis were performed by Y.Q., H.H. and J.W. The first draft of the manuscript was written by H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.Data availabilityData will be made available on request.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Hunan Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Planning Fund under Grant number 21ZDAJ007 and Collaborative Innovation Center for Emissions Trading system Co-constructed by the Province and Ministry under Grant number 22CICETS-ZD010 and 22CICETS-YB027.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Trade & Economic Development\",\"volume\":\"275 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Trade & Economic Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2023.2275162\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Trade & Economic Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2023.2275162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究选取2004 - 2019年中国34个产业部门的面板数据,实证检验双向FDI协调发展过程中的碳减排效应及其传导路径。研究结果表明,中国工业部门双向FDI协调发展具有显著但异质性的碳减排效应。双向FDI在高产规模集团、低能耗产业和高技术产业的协同发展对碳排放的抑制作用更强。中国工业部门双向FDI协调发展水平越高,其碳减排效果越显著。2013年“一带一路”倡议提出后,中国工业行业双向FDI协调发展的碳减排效果更强。机制检验结果表明,中国工业部门双向FDI协调发展主要通过规模效应、结构效应和技术效应三种传导路径影响国内碳排放。其中,规模效应为正,结构和技术效应为负。关键词:双向碳减排协调发展联立方程模型中国工业部门分类:A10A1A披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。所有作者都对研究的构思和设计做出了贡献。材料准备和数据收集和分析由Y.Q, H.H.和J.W.完成。手稿的初稿由H.H.撰写。所有作者都已阅读并同意手稿的出版版本。数据可得性应要求提供数据。项目资助:湖南省哲学社会科学规划基金(项目号:21ZDAJ007)和省部共建碳排放交易体系协同创新中心(项目号:22CICETS-ZD010和22CICETS-YB027)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can the coordinated development of two-way FDI promote carbon emission reduction? Evidence from industrial sectors in China
AbstractIn this study, the panel data of 34 industrial sectors are selected from 2004 to 2019 in China and empirically tested the carbon emission reduction effect and its transmission path during the coordinated development of two-way FDI. The results show that the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China's industrial sector had a significant but heterogeneous carbon emission reduction effect. The coordinated development of two-way FDI in high-yield scale groups, low-energy-consumption industries and high-tech industries had a stronger inhibitory effect on carbon emissions. When the coordinated development level of two-way FDI in China's industrial sector was high, its carbon emission reduction effect was more significant. After the Belt and Road Initiative was put forward in 2013, the carbon emission reduction effect of the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China's industrial industry was stronger. The mechanism test results showed that the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China's industrial sector mainly affected domestic carbon emissions through three transmission paths: scale, structure, and technology effects. Of these, the scale effect was positive, and the structure and technology effects were negative.KEYWORDS: Coordinated development of two-way FDIcarbon emission reductionsimultaneous equation modelsChina's industrial sectorsJEL Classifications: A10A1A Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Credit author statementAll the authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection and analysis were performed by Y.Q., H.H. and J.W. The first draft of the manuscript was written by H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.Data availabilityData will be made available on request.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Hunan Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Planning Fund under Grant number 21ZDAJ007 and Collaborative Innovation Center for Emissions Trading system Co-constructed by the Province and Ministry under Grant number 22CICETS-ZD010 and 22CICETS-YB027.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development ( JITED) focuses on international economics, economic development, and the interface between trade and development. The links between trade and development economics are critical at a time when fluctuating commodity prices, ongoing production fragmentation, and trade liberalisation can radically affect the economies of advanced and developing countries. Our aim is to keep in touch with the latest developments in research as well as setting the agenda for future analysis. Publication of high quality articles covering; theoretical and applied issues in international and development economics; econometric applications of trade and/or development issues based on sound theoretical economic models or testing fundamental economic hypotheses; models of structural change; trade and development issues of economies in Eastern Europe, Asia and the Pacific area; papers on specific topics which are policy-relevant; review articles on important branches of the literature including controversial and innovative ideas are also welcome. JITED is designed to meet the needs of international and development economists, economic historians, applied economists, and policy makers. The international experts who make up the journal’s Editorial Board encourage contributions from economists world-wide.
期刊最新文献
Local demand and firms’ upgrading in global value chains: Evidence from China Trade liberalisation and off-farm employment of the rural labour force: Evidence from China’s WTO accession Exports of intermediate goods and innovation: Evidence from China’s firms Country-of-origin effects on technology transfer in foreign direct investment Tariff rates in gravity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1