硅粉、包覆膨胀聚苯乙烯微珠和无粉乳胶手套在空心混凝土砌块制造中的应用

Mohd Amirul B. Mohd Snin, Izwan B. Johari, Nuratikah Ahmad Nordin, Noor Nabila Aznan, Nurulfatin Aqilah Mohd Yazid
{"title":"硅粉、包覆膨胀聚苯乙烯微珠和无粉乳胶手套在空心混凝土砌块制造中的应用","authors":"Mohd Amirul B. Mohd Snin, Izwan B. Johari, Nuratikah Ahmad Nordin, Noor Nabila Aznan, Nurulfatin Aqilah Mohd Yazid","doi":"10.4028/p-btb2rj","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Production of the hollow concrete blocks is always facing the issues on its weight and carbon emission. The use of alternative materials may help to reduce the weight and environment issue in producing the hollow concrete blocks. This paper investigates the use of alternative materials in fabricating the hollow concrete blocks. Three alternative materials used in this study were silica fume (SF), coated expanded polystyrene beads (CEPS) and powder free latex glove (PFLG). CEPS and PFLG were used to replace partial of sand in mixtures. Meanwhile, SF was used to replace the partial of cement in mixture. All these three materials were used in different mixtures of concrete mortar. There were 18 specimens fabricated made of each mixture (control specimen, SF, CEPS and PFLG). The specimens then tested with compressive strength, water absorption, density and initial rate of suction. The results show that the compressive strength and density of the hollow concrete blocks made of SF was higher than the control samples. But the water absorption percentage and initial rate of suction of hollow concrete blocks made of SF were lower than control specimens. Contrary, the compressive strength, water absorption, density and initial rate of suction of the specimen made of CEPS beads and PFLG were lower than control specimens. It was concluded that the SF can increase the compressive strength and make the blocks denser. Meanwhile, CEPS beads and PFLG can reduce the weight but the compressive strength also decrease about 40%-50%.","PeriodicalId":10603,"journal":{"name":"Construction Technologies and Architecture","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Silica Fume, Coated Expanded Polystyrene Beads and Powder Free Latex Glove in Fabricating the Hollow Concrete Blocks\",\"authors\":\"Mohd Amirul B. Mohd Snin, Izwan B. Johari, Nuratikah Ahmad Nordin, Noor Nabila Aznan, Nurulfatin Aqilah Mohd Yazid\",\"doi\":\"10.4028/p-btb2rj\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Production of the hollow concrete blocks is always facing the issues on its weight and carbon emission. The use of alternative materials may help to reduce the weight and environment issue in producing the hollow concrete blocks. This paper investigates the use of alternative materials in fabricating the hollow concrete blocks. Three alternative materials used in this study were silica fume (SF), coated expanded polystyrene beads (CEPS) and powder free latex glove (PFLG). CEPS and PFLG were used to replace partial of sand in mixtures. Meanwhile, SF was used to replace the partial of cement in mixture. All these three materials were used in different mixtures of concrete mortar. There were 18 specimens fabricated made of each mixture (control specimen, SF, CEPS and PFLG). The specimens then tested with compressive strength, water absorption, density and initial rate of suction. The results show that the compressive strength and density of the hollow concrete blocks made of SF was higher than the control samples. But the water absorption percentage and initial rate of suction of hollow concrete blocks made of SF were lower than control specimens. Contrary, the compressive strength, water absorption, density and initial rate of suction of the specimen made of CEPS beads and PFLG were lower than control specimens. It was concluded that the SF can increase the compressive strength and make the blocks denser. Meanwhile, CEPS beads and PFLG can reduce the weight but the compressive strength also decrease about 40%-50%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Construction Technologies and Architecture\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Construction Technologies and Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-btb2rj\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Technologies and Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-btb2rj","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

空心混凝土砌块的生产一直面临着其重量和碳排放的问题。使用替代材料可能有助于减轻生产空心混凝土砌块的重量和环境问题。本文研究了替代材料在空心混凝土砌块制造中的应用。本研究中使用的三种替代材料是硅粉(SF)、涂覆膨胀聚苯乙烯珠(CEPS)和无粉乳胶手套(PFLG)。用cceps和PFLG代替混合物中的部分砂粒。同时,用SF代替混合料中的部分水泥。这三种材料都被用于不同的混凝土砂浆混合物中。每种混合物(对照标本、SF、CEPS和PFLG)共制作18个标本。然后测试了试样的抗压强度、吸水率、密度和初始吸力率。结果表明:SF空心砌块的抗压强度和密度均高于对照样品;但SF空心混凝土砌块的吸水率和初始吸力率均低于对照。相反,cceps珠和PFLG试件的抗压强度、吸水率、密度和初始吸力率均低于对照试件。实验结果表明,SF可以提高砌块的抗压强度,使砌块更加致密。同时,cceps珠和PFLG可减轻重量,但抗压强度也降低了40% ~ 50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Use of Silica Fume, Coated Expanded Polystyrene Beads and Powder Free Latex Glove in Fabricating the Hollow Concrete Blocks
Production of the hollow concrete blocks is always facing the issues on its weight and carbon emission. The use of alternative materials may help to reduce the weight and environment issue in producing the hollow concrete blocks. This paper investigates the use of alternative materials in fabricating the hollow concrete blocks. Three alternative materials used in this study were silica fume (SF), coated expanded polystyrene beads (CEPS) and powder free latex glove (PFLG). CEPS and PFLG were used to replace partial of sand in mixtures. Meanwhile, SF was used to replace the partial of cement in mixture. All these three materials were used in different mixtures of concrete mortar. There were 18 specimens fabricated made of each mixture (control specimen, SF, CEPS and PFLG). The specimens then tested with compressive strength, water absorption, density and initial rate of suction. The results show that the compressive strength and density of the hollow concrete blocks made of SF was higher than the control samples. But the water absorption percentage and initial rate of suction of hollow concrete blocks made of SF were lower than control specimens. Contrary, the compressive strength, water absorption, density and initial rate of suction of the specimen made of CEPS beads and PFLG were lower than control specimens. It was concluded that the SF can increase the compressive strength and make the blocks denser. Meanwhile, CEPS beads and PFLG can reduce the weight but the compressive strength also decrease about 40%-50%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lantana Camara Plant-Biochar Added Cementitious Mortar for Carbon Sequestration: Effect on Early-Age Properties An Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties of Concrete by Using Human Hair Fiber as Reinforcement Designing a Material Database for the Flood-Resistant Housing An Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Concrete by Using Various Types of Coarse Aggregates of Different Quarries Progressive Pushover Analysis of a Reinforced Concrete Bridge of Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1