控制点、控制率与自我控制的偏差及其关系

IF 2.2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Inquiry Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.1111/soin.12571
Matan Markovizky, Yoel Shafran
{"title":"控制点、控制率与自我控制的偏差及其关系","authors":"Matan Markovizky, Yoel Shafran","doi":"10.1111/soin.12571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the current study is to examine the widely used term controllability through analysis of three important factors, based on three known theories of delinquency: The first factor, the control ratio , is the relationship between people's perception of their control over their environment and their perception of the environment's control over them (Tittle, Control Balance: Toward a General Theory of Deviance , Westview, 1995; Tittle, Theor. Criminol. , 8 , 2004, 395; Tittle, Recent Developments in Criminological Theory , Routledge, 2017). The second factor, locus of control , differentiates between people who think they control their own lives and those who feel that their lives control them (Rotter, Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (1, Whole No. 609), 1966). Finally, the third factor, self‐control , relates to people's ability to direct their behavior (Gottfredson & Hirschi, A general Theory of Crime , Stanford University, 1990). Five research hypotheses were examined: (1) the higher the internal locus of control, the lower the external locus of control – fate and others; (2) the higher the self‐control, the higher the internal locus of control/control ratio; (3) the greater the lack of control (i.e., the lower the control ratio), the greater the external locus of control; (4) the lower the self‐control, the higher the external locus of control/lack of control; (5) the higher the control ratio, the higher the internal locus of control. Questionnaires were completed by 215 undergraduate students from four different faculties from the same university, 53 males and 58 females studying psychology or social work (i.e., therapy‐oriented disciplines), 58 males and 46 females studying economics or law (i.e., non‐therapy‐oriented disciplines). The findings of the study reinforced all five hypotheses, thereby providing an additional layer of infrastructure for conducting the important mapping of various factors that are part of controll a bility . The results also enabled ties and connections to be made between these and additional factors, on the road to understanding, coping with and intervening in a range of human activities in general, and deviant behavior specifically.","PeriodicalId":47699,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Inquiry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Deviance and Relationship between Locus of Control, Control Ratio, and Self‐Control\",\"authors\":\"Matan Markovizky, Yoel Shafran\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/soin.12571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the current study is to examine the widely used term controllability through analysis of three important factors, based on three known theories of delinquency: The first factor, the control ratio , is the relationship between people's perception of their control over their environment and their perception of the environment's control over them (Tittle, Control Balance: Toward a General Theory of Deviance , Westview, 1995; Tittle, Theor. Criminol. , 8 , 2004, 395; Tittle, Recent Developments in Criminological Theory , Routledge, 2017). The second factor, locus of control , differentiates between people who think they control their own lives and those who feel that their lives control them (Rotter, Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (1, Whole No. 609), 1966). Finally, the third factor, self‐control , relates to people's ability to direct their behavior (Gottfredson & Hirschi, A general Theory of Crime , Stanford University, 1990). Five research hypotheses were examined: (1) the higher the internal locus of control, the lower the external locus of control – fate and others; (2) the higher the self‐control, the higher the internal locus of control/control ratio; (3) the greater the lack of control (i.e., the lower the control ratio), the greater the external locus of control; (4) the lower the self‐control, the higher the external locus of control/lack of control; (5) the higher the control ratio, the higher the internal locus of control. Questionnaires were completed by 215 undergraduate students from four different faculties from the same university, 53 males and 58 females studying psychology or social work (i.e., therapy‐oriented disciplines), 58 males and 46 females studying economics or law (i.e., non‐therapy‐oriented disciplines). The findings of the study reinforced all five hypotheses, thereby providing an additional layer of infrastructure for conducting the important mapping of various factors that are part of controll a bility . The results also enabled ties and connections to be made between these and additional factors, on the road to understanding, coping with and intervening in a range of human activities in general, and deviant behavior specifically.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociological Inquiry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociological Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12571\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12571","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是在三种已知的犯罪理论的基础上,通过分析三个重要因素来检验被广泛使用的术语可控性:第一个因素,控制比率,是人们对他们对环境的控制的感知与他们对环境对他们的控制的感知之间的关系(Tittle, control Balance: towards a General Theory of Deviance, Westview, 1995;名字,定理。Criminol。, 8, 2004, 395;Tittle,犯罪学理论的最新发展,Routledge, 2017)。第二个因素,控制点,区分了那些认为自己控制自己生活的人和那些觉得生活控制自己的人(Rotter,内部与外部强化控制的广义期望)。心理学专论,80(1),全集609号,1966)。最后,第三个因素,自我控制,与人们指导自己行为的能力有关(Gottfredson &Hirschi:《犯罪通论》,斯坦福大学,1990年。检验了五个研究假设:(1)内部控制点越高,外部控制点-命运和其他越低;(2)自我控制水平越高,内部控制源/控制比越高;(3)控制缺失越大(即控制比越低),外部控制点越大;(4)自我控制水平越低,外部控制源/控制缺失越高;(5)控制比越高,内部控制位点越高。问卷调查由来自同一所大学四个不同学院的215名本科生完成,其中53名男性和58名女性学习心理学或社会工作(即治疗导向学科),58名男性和46名女性学习经济学或法学(即非治疗导向学科)。该研究的发现强化了所有五个假设,从而为进行作为控制能力一部分的各种因素的重要映射提供了额外的基础设施层。研究结果还使这些因素与其他因素之间建立了联系和联系,从而在理解、应对和干预一系列人类活动的道路上,特别是在异常行为方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Deviance and Relationship between Locus of Control, Control Ratio, and Self‐Control
The purpose of the current study is to examine the widely used term controllability through analysis of three important factors, based on three known theories of delinquency: The first factor, the control ratio , is the relationship between people's perception of their control over their environment and their perception of the environment's control over them (Tittle, Control Balance: Toward a General Theory of Deviance , Westview, 1995; Tittle, Theor. Criminol. , 8 , 2004, 395; Tittle, Recent Developments in Criminological Theory , Routledge, 2017). The second factor, locus of control , differentiates between people who think they control their own lives and those who feel that their lives control them (Rotter, Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (1, Whole No. 609), 1966). Finally, the third factor, self‐control , relates to people's ability to direct their behavior (Gottfredson & Hirschi, A general Theory of Crime , Stanford University, 1990). Five research hypotheses were examined: (1) the higher the internal locus of control, the lower the external locus of control – fate and others; (2) the higher the self‐control, the higher the internal locus of control/control ratio; (3) the greater the lack of control (i.e., the lower the control ratio), the greater the external locus of control; (4) the lower the self‐control, the higher the external locus of control/lack of control; (5) the higher the control ratio, the higher the internal locus of control. Questionnaires were completed by 215 undergraduate students from four different faculties from the same university, 53 males and 58 females studying psychology or social work (i.e., therapy‐oriented disciplines), 58 males and 46 females studying economics or law (i.e., non‐therapy‐oriented disciplines). The findings of the study reinforced all five hypotheses, thereby providing an additional layer of infrastructure for conducting the important mapping of various factors that are part of controll a bility . The results also enabled ties and connections to be made between these and additional factors, on the road to understanding, coping with and intervening in a range of human activities in general, and deviant behavior specifically.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Sociological Inquiry (SI) is committed to the exploration of the human condition in all of its social and cultural complexity. Its papers challenge us to look anew at traditional areas or identify novel areas for investigation. SI publishes both theoretical and empirical work as well as varied research methods in the study of social and cultural life.
期刊最新文献
Anticipatory Race‐Related Stress and Depressive Symptoms Among U.S. Black Women Attending a Historically Black University: Are Psychosocial Resources Stress Buffers? Working Time, Income Inequality, and Life Expectancy: A Longitudinal Analysis of US States, 2005–2018 “We May Look Like Cream‐of‐the‐Crop Kids, but it's Tough Here”: Elite Identity, Emotional Burden, and Ethical Transgressions Among Students at an Elite High School “Don't Touch!”: The Role of Cultural Knowledge in Low‐SES Parents' Perceptions of Museums Does Social Trust Travel? Comparing Resident and Non‐resident Citizens from a High‐Trusting Country
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1