小试验区两种不同的土壤侵蚀模拟方法

Q3 Engineering Pollack Periodica Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.1556/606.2023.00835
Matúš Tomaščík, Michaela Danáčová, Zuzana Németová
{"title":"小试验区两种不同的土壤侵蚀模拟方法","authors":"Matúš Tomaščík, Michaela Danáčová, Zuzana Németová","doi":"10.1556/606.2023.00835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The models compared in this study were applied to a catchment located in the western part of Slovakia in order to analyze and compare the amount of soil loss in different periods. Using of the empirical model universal soil loss equation, the average annual soil loss in the pilot basin was modeled for 2015–2020. The universal soil loss equation includes a topographic factor modeled using the USLE2D external model. In order to compare the empirical model and the physically-based model a continual sequence of individual rainfall events was created and used as an input to the physically-based EROSION-3D model. The results reflect different behaviors of erosion processes in a catchment together with a comparison between empirical and physically-based approaches.","PeriodicalId":35003,"journal":{"name":"Pollack Periodica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two different soil erosion modeling approaches in a small experimental area\",\"authors\":\"Matúš Tomaščík, Michaela Danáčová, Zuzana Németová\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/606.2023.00835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The models compared in this study were applied to a catchment located in the western part of Slovakia in order to analyze and compare the amount of soil loss in different periods. Using of the empirical model universal soil loss equation, the average annual soil loss in the pilot basin was modeled for 2015–2020. The universal soil loss equation includes a topographic factor modeled using the USLE2D external model. In order to compare the empirical model and the physically-based model a continual sequence of individual rainfall events was created and used as an input to the physically-based EROSION-3D model. The results reflect different behaviors of erosion processes in a catchment together with a comparison between empirical and physically-based approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pollack Periodica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pollack Periodica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/606.2023.00835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pollack Periodica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/606.2023.00835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了分析和比较斯洛伐克西部某流域不同时期的土壤流失量,本文将所比较的模型应用于该流域。利用经验模型通用土壤流失量方程,建立了2015-2020年中试流域年平均土壤流失量模型。通用土壤流失方程包括使用USLE2D外部模型建模的地形因子。为了比较经验模型和基于物理的模型,研究人员创建了连续的单个降雨事件序列,并将其作为基于物理的EROSION-3D模型的输入。结果反映了流域侵蚀过程的不同行为,以及经验方法和物理方法之间的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Two different soil erosion modeling approaches in a small experimental area
Abstract The models compared in this study were applied to a catchment located in the western part of Slovakia in order to analyze and compare the amount of soil loss in different periods. Using of the empirical model universal soil loss equation, the average annual soil loss in the pilot basin was modeled for 2015–2020. The universal soil loss equation includes a topographic factor modeled using the USLE2D external model. In order to compare the empirical model and the physically-based model a continual sequence of individual rainfall events was created and used as an input to the physically-based EROSION-3D model. The results reflect different behaviors of erosion processes in a catchment together with a comparison between empirical and physically-based approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pollack Periodica
Pollack Periodica Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Pollack Periodica is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international forum for the presentation, discussion and dissemination of the latest advances and developments in engineering and informatics. Pollack Periodica invites papers reporting new research and applications from a wide range of discipline, including civil, mechanical, electrical, environmental, earthquake, material and information engineering. The journal aims at reaching a wider audience, not only researchers, but also those likely to be most affected by research results, for example designers, fabricators, specialists, developers, computer scientists managers in academic, governmental and industrial communities.
期刊最新文献
Porosity and pore morphology characteristics of zirconia-alumina bioceramics The practical implementations of axes in the design of a systematic office layout Collision and contiguity in the transformation of Prishtina's urban form Concrete's fire resistance improvement with waste glass and ceramic aggregates Advanced facial recognition with LBP-URIGL hybrid descriptors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1