{"title":"更广泛地使用伊维菌素治疗COVID-19感染本可以挽救许多人的生命","authors":"Alberto Boretti, Bimal K. Banik","doi":"10.2174/2213337210666230809141610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Here we review the available literature for the specific use of Ivermectin against COVID-19 infection. Currently, 204 works have been published presenting the results of ivermectin use for COVID-19. 156 are peer-reviewed, and 96 are comparing treatment and control groups. Ivermectin was adopted for early treatment in all or part of 22 countries (39 including non-government medical organizations). The 96 studies of Ivermectin for COVID-19 were published by 1,030 scientists, reporting the cases of 135,554 patients in 27 countries. These studies show a statistically significant improvement in mortality, ventilation, ICU, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. Specifically, improvements recorded were 85%, 62%, and 43% for prophylaxis, early, and late treatment, with confidence intervals (CI) [77-90%], [51-70%], [28-54%] respectively. A 56% improvement was recorded in the 45 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with CI [41-68%]. A 51% lower mortality was evidenced from 49 studies with CI [37-61%]. In February 2021, when the war on Ivermectin started in the West, it was clear that this drug had positive effects, working in-vivo/in-vitro, and delivering mostly positive results in clinical trials. More widespread use of Ivermectin could have saved many people, and suppression of this drug in many countries that had very high cumulative fatalities per million people has been a very unfortunate occurrence for science.","PeriodicalId":10945,"journal":{"name":"Current Organocatalysis","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More Widespread use of Ivermectin for the Treatment of COVID-19 Infec-tion could have Saved Many\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Boretti, Bimal K. Banik\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2213337210666230809141610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Here we review the available literature for the specific use of Ivermectin against COVID-19 infection. Currently, 204 works have been published presenting the results of ivermectin use for COVID-19. 156 are peer-reviewed, and 96 are comparing treatment and control groups. Ivermectin was adopted for early treatment in all or part of 22 countries (39 including non-government medical organizations). The 96 studies of Ivermectin for COVID-19 were published by 1,030 scientists, reporting the cases of 135,554 patients in 27 countries. These studies show a statistically significant improvement in mortality, ventilation, ICU, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. Specifically, improvements recorded were 85%, 62%, and 43% for prophylaxis, early, and late treatment, with confidence intervals (CI) [77-90%], [51-70%], [28-54%] respectively. A 56% improvement was recorded in the 45 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with CI [41-68%]. A 51% lower mortality was evidenced from 49 studies with CI [37-61%]. In February 2021, when the war on Ivermectin started in the West, it was clear that this drug had positive effects, working in-vivo/in-vitro, and delivering mostly positive results in clinical trials. More widespread use of Ivermectin could have saved many people, and suppression of this drug in many countries that had very high cumulative fatalities per million people has been a very unfortunate occurrence for science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Organocatalysis\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Organocatalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2213337210666230809141610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Organocatalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2213337210666230809141610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
More Widespread use of Ivermectin for the Treatment of COVID-19 Infec-tion could have Saved Many
Abstract: Here we review the available literature for the specific use of Ivermectin against COVID-19 infection. Currently, 204 works have been published presenting the results of ivermectin use for COVID-19. 156 are peer-reviewed, and 96 are comparing treatment and control groups. Ivermectin was adopted for early treatment in all or part of 22 countries (39 including non-government medical organizations). The 96 studies of Ivermectin for COVID-19 were published by 1,030 scientists, reporting the cases of 135,554 patients in 27 countries. These studies show a statistically significant improvement in mortality, ventilation, ICU, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. Specifically, improvements recorded were 85%, 62%, and 43% for prophylaxis, early, and late treatment, with confidence intervals (CI) [77-90%], [51-70%], [28-54%] respectively. A 56% improvement was recorded in the 45 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with CI [41-68%]. A 51% lower mortality was evidenced from 49 studies with CI [37-61%]. In February 2021, when the war on Ivermectin started in the West, it was clear that this drug had positive effects, working in-vivo/in-vitro, and delivering mostly positive results in clinical trials. More widespread use of Ivermectin could have saved many people, and suppression of this drug in many countries that had very high cumulative fatalities per million people has been a very unfortunate occurrence for science.
期刊介绍:
Current Organocatalysis is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes significant research in all areas of organocatalysis. The journal covers organo homogeneous/heterogeneous catalysis, innovative mechanistic studies and kinetics of organocatalytic processes focusing on practical, theoretical and computational aspects. It also includes potential applications of organocatalysts in the fields of drug discovery, synthesis of novel molecules, synthetic method development, green chemistry and chemoenzymatic reactions. This journal also accepts papers on methods, reagents, and mechanism of a synthetic process and technology pertaining to chemistry. Moreover, this journal features full-length/mini review articles within organocatalysis and synthetic chemistry. It is the premier source of organocatalysis and synthetic methods related information for chemists, biologists and engineers pursuing research in industry and academia.