遗传学和心理健康研究中的伦理和社会问题

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Salud Mental Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2023.032
Eduardo Rodríguez-Yunta
{"title":"遗传学和心理健康研究中的伦理和社会问题","authors":"Eduardo Rodríguez-Yunta","doi":"10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2023.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To reflect on ethical and social issues related to research on the genetics of mental health. Method. A narrative review was undertaken of 87 articles found in three databases: Medline, Scopus, and Scielo. Keywords were defined broadly to capture as many relevant publications as possible. Data were summarized by topic. Results. The following topics were identified regarding the application of genetic and genomic tools to mental health disorders: problems with diagnosis, proper informed consent procedures, protecting confidential data, providing participants with research results, risk-benefit balance, equity and access, commercialization of genotyping, and prenatal testing. Discussion and Conclusion. Although a promising field, there is still much research needed on genetic approaches to mental health to achieve clinical relevance and predictive value, and more so in developing countries where there is little available data. Cost-benefit studies thus do not recommend genetic diagnoses in underdeveloped settings. Instead, local approaches should be enhanced. One limitation of research on the genetics of mental health is that it seeks biological causes for mental illnesses. However, the etiology of most mental health disorders is multifactorial, limiting the predictive value of genetic tests. Still, understanding the genetic origins of the biological pathways that lead to mental illness is important to diagnosis and therapy. Other problems discussed are enhancement of the informed consent process and counseling, protection of the right to know and not to know, and how the geneticization of disease is related to stigma.","PeriodicalId":46510,"journal":{"name":"Salud Mental","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical and social issues in research on genetics and mental health\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Rodríguez-Yunta\",\"doi\":\"10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2023.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. To reflect on ethical and social issues related to research on the genetics of mental health. Method. A narrative review was undertaken of 87 articles found in three databases: Medline, Scopus, and Scielo. Keywords were defined broadly to capture as many relevant publications as possible. Data were summarized by topic. Results. The following topics were identified regarding the application of genetic and genomic tools to mental health disorders: problems with diagnosis, proper informed consent procedures, protecting confidential data, providing participants with research results, risk-benefit balance, equity and access, commercialization of genotyping, and prenatal testing. Discussion and Conclusion. Although a promising field, there is still much research needed on genetic approaches to mental health to achieve clinical relevance and predictive value, and more so in developing countries where there is little available data. Cost-benefit studies thus do not recommend genetic diagnoses in underdeveloped settings. Instead, local approaches should be enhanced. One limitation of research on the genetics of mental health is that it seeks biological causes for mental illnesses. However, the etiology of most mental health disorders is multifactorial, limiting the predictive value of genetic tests. Still, understanding the genetic origins of the biological pathways that lead to mental illness is important to diagnosis and therapy. Other problems discussed are enhancement of the informed consent process and counseling, protection of the right to know and not to know, and how the geneticization of disease is related to stigma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Salud Mental\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Salud Mental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2023.032\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud Mental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2023.032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标。反思与心理健康遗传学研究有关的伦理和社会问题。方法。对Medline、Scopus和Scielo三个数据库中的87篇文章进行了叙述性综述。关键词定义广泛,以便尽可能多地获取相关出版物。数据按主题汇总。结果。在将遗传和基因组工具应用于精神健康障碍方面,确定了以下主题:诊断问题、适当的知情同意程序、保护机密数据、向参与者提供研究结果、风险-利益平衡、公平和获取、基因分型商业化以及产前检测。讨论与结论。虽然这是一个很有前途的领域,但仍然需要对心理健康的遗传方法进行大量研究,以实现临床相关性和预测价值,在数据很少的发展中国家更是如此。因此,成本效益研究不建议在不发达地区进行基因诊断。相反,应该加强地方方法。心理健康遗传学研究的一个局限是它寻求精神疾病的生物学原因。然而,大多数精神疾病的病因是多因素的,限制了基因检测的预测价值。尽管如此,了解导致精神疾病的生物途径的遗传起源对诊断和治疗很重要。讨论的其他问题包括加强知情同意程序和咨询,保护知情权和不知情权,以及疾病的遗传与耻辱的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethical and social issues in research on genetics and mental health
Objective. To reflect on ethical and social issues related to research on the genetics of mental health. Method. A narrative review was undertaken of 87 articles found in three databases: Medline, Scopus, and Scielo. Keywords were defined broadly to capture as many relevant publications as possible. Data were summarized by topic. Results. The following topics were identified regarding the application of genetic and genomic tools to mental health disorders: problems with diagnosis, proper informed consent procedures, protecting confidential data, providing participants with research results, risk-benefit balance, equity and access, commercialization of genotyping, and prenatal testing. Discussion and Conclusion. Although a promising field, there is still much research needed on genetic approaches to mental health to achieve clinical relevance and predictive value, and more so in developing countries where there is little available data. Cost-benefit studies thus do not recommend genetic diagnoses in underdeveloped settings. Instead, local approaches should be enhanced. One limitation of research on the genetics of mental health is that it seeks biological causes for mental illnesses. However, the etiology of most mental health disorders is multifactorial, limiting the predictive value of genetic tests. Still, understanding the genetic origins of the biological pathways that lead to mental illness is important to diagnosis and therapy. Other problems discussed are enhancement of the informed consent process and counseling, protection of the right to know and not to know, and how the geneticization of disease is related to stigma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Salud Mental
Salud Mental PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Salud Mental receives original manuscripts dealing with various mental health-related topics (such as psychiatry, neurosciences, psychology, epidemiology, and addictions). The submission of a manuscript must be exclusively carried out through this website.
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology of suicide mortality in Mexican young people (ages 15-29) from 1990 to 2020 Mexico at the United Nations: A step forward for mental health Clinical practice stressors and anxiety in nursing students during COVID-19 Emotional distress and self-care during the COVID-19 pandemic in women from an indigenous migrant cultural collective in Mexico City Is there interest of Mexican adults in being prepared should they develop Alzheimer’s or other dementia?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1