椭圆环形交叉路口的交通流通效率

Hardi S. Fathullah, Hirsh M. Majid, Chro H. Ahmed, Sulleyman H. Sourkan, Karzan S. Ismael, Balen Z. Abdulsamad
{"title":"椭圆环形交叉路口的交通流通效率","authors":"Hardi S. Fathullah, Hirsh M. Majid, Chro H. Ahmed, Sulleyman H. Sourkan, Karzan S. Ismael, Balen Z. Abdulsamad","doi":"10.14500/aro.11150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the impact of geometry of central island of roundabout on operational performance in terms of delay and capacity measures. A roundabout with an elliptical central island having major and minor axes of 63 and 44m respectively was selected as a case study. Using SIDRA Intersection software two simulation models are developed while considering two geometric shapes of central island; one with an elliptical shape and the other with a circular shape. The peak traffic volume of each approach was assigned to both models as a preliminary simulation then twelve scenarios were generated by assigning identical lane volumes starting from a value that gave level of service A and increasing gradually to level of service F. In each scenario 100% of the volume assigned to an approach while the other was assigned with 75% of it and this process was reversed for every run. The results revealed that at high degree of saturation, the elliptical roundabout generally possessed a higher performance especially in term of delay and capacity compared to the circular roundabout. Furthermore, a parametric study was carried out through running eight more simulation scenarios to examine the impacts of heavy vehicle percentage (HV%) on the roundabout operational performance. The (HV %) started from 2% and increased to 12% with alternate approach virtual volume, and the results showed that performance of the elliptical roundabout was higher than the circular roundabout. However it was more susceptible to increase of HV% in term of control delay and capacity.","PeriodicalId":8665,"journal":{"name":"ARO. The Scientific Journal of Koya University","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traffic Circulation Efficiency of Elliptical Roundabouts\",\"authors\":\"Hardi S. Fathullah, Hirsh M. Majid, Chro H. Ahmed, Sulleyman H. Sourkan, Karzan S. Ismael, Balen Z. Abdulsamad\",\"doi\":\"10.14500/aro.11150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the impact of geometry of central island of roundabout on operational performance in terms of delay and capacity measures. A roundabout with an elliptical central island having major and minor axes of 63 and 44m respectively was selected as a case study. Using SIDRA Intersection software two simulation models are developed while considering two geometric shapes of central island; one with an elliptical shape and the other with a circular shape. The peak traffic volume of each approach was assigned to both models as a preliminary simulation then twelve scenarios were generated by assigning identical lane volumes starting from a value that gave level of service A and increasing gradually to level of service F. In each scenario 100% of the volume assigned to an approach while the other was assigned with 75% of it and this process was reversed for every run. The results revealed that at high degree of saturation, the elliptical roundabout generally possessed a higher performance especially in term of delay and capacity compared to the circular roundabout. Furthermore, a parametric study was carried out through running eight more simulation scenarios to examine the impacts of heavy vehicle percentage (HV%) on the roundabout operational performance. The (HV %) started from 2% and increased to 12% with alternate approach virtual volume, and the results showed that performance of the elliptical roundabout was higher than the circular roundabout. However it was more susceptible to increase of HV% in term of control delay and capacity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARO. The Scientific Journal of Koya University\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARO. The Scientific Journal of Koya University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14500/aro.11150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARO. The Scientific Journal of Koya University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14500/aro.11150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从延误和通行能力两方面探讨了环形交叉口中心岛的几何形状对运行性能的影响。选择一个椭圆形中心岛的环形交叉路口作为案例研究,其长轴和短轴分别为63和44米。利用SIDRA Intersection软件建立了考虑中心岛两种几何形状的仿真模型;一个是椭圆形,另一个是圆形。将每个路径的峰值交通量分配给两个模型作为初步模拟,然后通过从给定服务水平a的值开始逐渐增加到服务水平f的值分配相同的车道量来生成12个场景。在每个场景中,将100%的交通量分配给一个路径,而将75%的交通量分配给另一个路径,并且每次运行都将此过程反过来。结果表明,在高饱和状态下,椭圆环形交叉路口总体上具有更高的性能,特别是在时延和容量方面。在此基础上,通过运行8个模拟场景进行参数化研究,考察重型车辆百分比(HV%)对环形交叉路口运行性能的影响。(HV %)从2%开始,在交替进路虚拟体积下增加到12%,结果表明椭圆环形交叉路口的性能优于圆形交叉路口。但在控制延迟和容量方面,受HV%的增大影响较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Traffic Circulation Efficiency of Elliptical Roundabouts
This paper investigates the impact of geometry of central island of roundabout on operational performance in terms of delay and capacity measures. A roundabout with an elliptical central island having major and minor axes of 63 and 44m respectively was selected as a case study. Using SIDRA Intersection software two simulation models are developed while considering two geometric shapes of central island; one with an elliptical shape and the other with a circular shape. The peak traffic volume of each approach was assigned to both models as a preliminary simulation then twelve scenarios were generated by assigning identical lane volumes starting from a value that gave level of service A and increasing gradually to level of service F. In each scenario 100% of the volume assigned to an approach while the other was assigned with 75% of it and this process was reversed for every run. The results revealed that at high degree of saturation, the elliptical roundabout generally possessed a higher performance especially in term of delay and capacity compared to the circular roundabout. Furthermore, a parametric study was carried out through running eight more simulation scenarios to examine the impacts of heavy vehicle percentage (HV%) on the roundabout operational performance. The (HV %) started from 2% and increased to 12% with alternate approach virtual volume, and the results showed that performance of the elliptical roundabout was higher than the circular roundabout. However it was more susceptible to increase of HV% in term of control delay and capacity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Size Reduction and Harmonics Suppression in Microwave Power Dividers Investigating the Role of Metoclopramide and Hyoscine-N-Butyl Bromide in Colon Motility The Local Anesthetic Activity of Lavandula angustifolia and Eugenia caryophyllata Essential Oils Enhancing Upper Limb Prosthetic Control in Amputees Using Non-invasive EEG and EMG Signals with Machine Learning Techniques Design and Study of a Nanocavity-based One-dimensional Photonic Crystal for Potential Applications in Refractive Index Sensing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1