早期现代史上的典和经典?

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1163/18796583-12340092
Oliver Bach
{"title":"早期现代史上的典和经典?","authors":"Oliver Bach","doi":"10.1163/18796583-12340092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this article is to outline several aspects of a canon of early modern German literature as they had been discussed by a volume Klassiker der Frühen Neuzeit (ed. Regina Toepfer) in 2022. In the light of recent criticism of any conception of canon as an outcome of hegemonial thinking as well as considering the increasing disregard of early modern literature even in universities, it is foremost the Early Modern Literature Studies who are urged to discuss the question of whether there are sufficient reasons for upholding a literary canon at least to a certain degree and whether texts of the early modern period can or must be part of such a canon.","PeriodicalId":52008,"journal":{"name":"DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kanon und Klassiker der Frühen Neuzeit?\",\"authors\":\"Oliver Bach\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18796583-12340092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of this article is to outline several aspects of a canon of early modern German literature as they had been discussed by a volume Klassiker der Frühen Neuzeit (ed. Regina Toepfer) in 2022. In the light of recent criticism of any conception of canon as an outcome of hegemonial thinking as well as considering the increasing disregard of early modern literature even in universities, it is foremost the Early Modern Literature Studies who are urged to discuss the question of whether there are sufficient reasons for upholding a literary canon at least to a certain degree and whether texts of the early modern period can or must be part of such a canon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18796583-12340092\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18796583-12340092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文的目的是概述早期现代德国文学经典的几个方面,因为它们在2022年被一卷《古典文学》(Regina Toepfer编辑)所讨论。鉴于最近对经典概念的批评是霸权思维的结果,以及考虑到甚至在大学里对早期现代文学的日益漠视,早期现代文学研究首先被敦促讨论是否有足够的理由至少在一定程度上坚持文学经典,以及早期现代时期的文本是否可以或必须成为这种经典的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kanon und Klassiker der Frühen Neuzeit?
Abstract The aim of this article is to outline several aspects of a canon of early modern German literature as they had been discussed by a volume Klassiker der Frühen Neuzeit (ed. Regina Toepfer) in 2022. In the light of recent criticism of any conception of canon as an outcome of hegemonial thinking as well as considering the increasing disregard of early modern literature even in universities, it is foremost the Early Modern Literature Studies who are urged to discuss the question of whether there are sufficient reasons for upholding a literary canon at least to a certain degree and whether texts of the early modern period can or must be part of such a canon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR
DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Der "Daphnis" ist als Organ für die Erforschung der deutschen und neulateinischen Literatur vom Ausgang des 14. Jahrhunderts bis zur Mitte des 18. Jahrhunderts konzipiert worden. Er berücksichtigt darüber hinaus unter komparatistischem Aspekt auch die Beziehungen der Mittleren Deutschen Literatur zu den europäischen Literaturen dieses Zeitraums und widmet sich Problemen der frühneuhochdeutschen und neulateinischen Sprache.
期刊最新文献
Die Fuchsfalle, written by Jos von Pfullendorf Kanon und Klassiker der Frühen Neuzeit? Verführung zur Galanterie. Benehmen, Körperlichkeit und Gefühlsinzenierungen im literarischen Kulturtransfer 1664–1772, written by Isabelle Stauffer Reisen als Grenzüberwindung? Schreckensvision oder Drogenfreuden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1