FOCUS-PDCA下无缝护理管理对急性脑梗死合并吞咽困难患者的疗效及对营养状况和神经功能的影响

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Alternative therapies in health and medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01
Yue Niu, Luoxia Zhang, Xianghui Sun
{"title":"FOCUS-PDCA下无缝护理管理对急性脑梗死合并吞咽困难患者的疗效及对营养状况和神经功能的影响","authors":"Yue Niu, Luoxia Zhang, Xianghui Sun","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of seamless care management under FOCUS-PDCA for patients with acute cerebral infarction (ACI) complicated with dysphagia and its influence on nutrition status and neurological functions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 98 patients with acute cerebral infarction complicated with dysphagia admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to December 2022 were selected and divided into two groups with equal numbers. The control group received routine nursing management. The study group implemented seamless nursing management under FOCUS-PDCA based on the control group. The therapeutic effect, nutritional status, and neurological function of the two groups were compared before and after intervention. Patients in both groups were intervened for 1 month.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) After the intervention, the Water Drinking Test (WDT) Grade I and Grade II of the study group increased from 0.00% before the intervention to 32.65%, and the control group also increased from 0.00% before the intervention to 14.29% and 22.45%. , while the number of Grade III, Grade IV, and Grade V decreased in both the control group and the study group. That is, the WDT level test of both groups after the intervention was better than before the intervention, and the research group was better than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=2.732, P = .006). (2) There was no statistical significance in the GUSS score and SWAL-QOL of the two groups before the intervention (P > .05); after the intervention, the GUSS score of the control group (16.32±4.26) was lower than that of the study group (18.52±4.85) (P < .001) , the SWAL-QOL score of the control group (116.48±31.05) was lower than that of the study group (143.08±33.85) (P < .001), and the GUSS scores and SWAL-QOL of the two groups after the intervention were higher than before the intervention (P < .001). (3) Compared with the nutritional status of the two groups, there was no statistical significance in PA, ALB, and Hb before intervention (P > .05); after intervention, PA, ALB, and Hb in the control group were (218.15±27.15) and (38.67±5.84) respectively. (120.85±31.05), all lower than the study group (261.15±22.52), (42.84±6.32), (134.18±30.47) (P < .01), and the PA, ALB and Hb of the two groups after intervention were all higher than before intervention (P < .001). (4) Comparing TSF and MAMC between the two groups, there was no statistical significance in TSF and MAMC before intervention (P > .05); after intervention, TSF and MAMC in the control group were (13.84±6.38) and (28.61±4.15) respectively, both of which were low. Compared with the study group (16.94±6.69), (33.15±3.84) (P < .001), and the TSF and MAMC of the two groups after the intervention were higher than before the intervention (P < .001). (5) Comparing the neurological function and limb function between the two groups, there was no statistical significance in NIHSS and FMA before intervention (P > .05); after intervention, NIHSS and FMA in the control group were (19.64±3.52) and (48.15±4.85) respectively. The NIHSS was higher than that of the study group (16.52±3.85), and the FMA was lower than that of the study group (58.84±5.63) (P < .001). The NIHSS and FMA of both groups after the intervention were better than those before the intervention (P < .001). (6) The incidence rate of complications in the study group was 4.08%, which was lower than 18.37% in the control group (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Seamless nursing management for patients with ACI and dysphagia under the FOCUS-PDCA model has obvious effects. It can effectively improve the patient's swallowing function, reduce the degree of neurological deficit, improve their nutritional status and quality of life, and has fewer complications. It can be used clinically Promote within the application.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Seamless Care Management Under FOCUS-PDCA for Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction Complicated with Dysphagia and its Influence on Nutritional Status and Neurological Functions.\",\"authors\":\"Yue Niu, Luoxia Zhang, Xianghui Sun\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of seamless care management under FOCUS-PDCA for patients with acute cerebral infarction (ACI) complicated with dysphagia and its influence on nutrition status and neurological functions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 98 patients with acute cerebral infarction complicated with dysphagia admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to December 2022 were selected and divided into two groups with equal numbers. The control group received routine nursing management. The study group implemented seamless nursing management under FOCUS-PDCA based on the control group. The therapeutic effect, nutritional status, and neurological function of the two groups were compared before and after intervention. Patients in both groups were intervened for 1 month.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) After the intervention, the Water Drinking Test (WDT) Grade I and Grade II of the study group increased from 0.00% before the intervention to 32.65%, and the control group also increased from 0.00% before the intervention to 14.29% and 22.45%. , while the number of Grade III, Grade IV, and Grade V decreased in both the control group and the study group. That is, the WDT level test of both groups after the intervention was better than before the intervention, and the research group was better than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=2.732, P = .006). (2) There was no statistical significance in the GUSS score and SWAL-QOL of the two groups before the intervention (P > .05); after the intervention, the GUSS score of the control group (16.32±4.26) was lower than that of the study group (18.52±4.85) (P < .001) , the SWAL-QOL score of the control group (116.48±31.05) was lower than that of the study group (143.08±33.85) (P < .001), and the GUSS scores and SWAL-QOL of the two groups after the intervention were higher than before the intervention (P < .001). (3) Compared with the nutritional status of the two groups, there was no statistical significance in PA, ALB, and Hb before intervention (P > .05); after intervention, PA, ALB, and Hb in the control group were (218.15±27.15) and (38.67±5.84) respectively. (120.85±31.05), all lower than the study group (261.15±22.52), (42.84±6.32), (134.18±30.47) (P < .01), and the PA, ALB and Hb of the two groups after intervention were all higher than before intervention (P < .001). (4) Comparing TSF and MAMC between the two groups, there was no statistical significance in TSF and MAMC before intervention (P > .05); after intervention, TSF and MAMC in the control group were (13.84±6.38) and (28.61±4.15) respectively, both of which were low. Compared with the study group (16.94±6.69), (33.15±3.84) (P < .001), and the TSF and MAMC of the two groups after the intervention were higher than before the intervention (P < .001). (5) Comparing the neurological function and limb function between the two groups, there was no statistical significance in NIHSS and FMA before intervention (P > .05); after intervention, NIHSS and FMA in the control group were (19.64±3.52) and (48.15±4.85) respectively. The NIHSS was higher than that of the study group (16.52±3.85), and the FMA was lower than that of the study group (58.84±5.63) (P < .001). The NIHSS and FMA of both groups after the intervention were better than those before the intervention (P < .001). (6) The incidence rate of complications in the study group was 4.08%, which was lower than 18.37% in the control group (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Seamless nursing management for patients with ACI and dysphagia under the FOCUS-PDCA model has obvious effects. It can effectively improve the patient's swallowing function, reduce the degree of neurological deficit, improve their nutritional status and quality of life, and has fewer complications. It can be used clinically Promote within the application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternative therapies in health and medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternative therapies in health and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价FOCUS-PDCA下无缝护理管理对急性脑梗死(ACI)合并吞咽困难患者的疗效及其对营养状况和神经功能的影响。方法:选择2019年3月至2022年12月我院收治的急性脑梗死合并吞咽困难患者98例,随机分为两组,两组人数相等。对照组患者给予常规护理管理。研究组在对照组的基础上实施FOCUS-PDCA的无缝护理管理。比较干预前后两组患者的治疗效果、营养状况及神经功能。两组患者均干预1个月。结果:(1)干预后,研究组的饮用水测试(WDT) I级和II级从干预前的0.00%提高到32.65%,对照组也从干预前的0.00%提高到14.29%和22.45%。,而对照组和研究组的III级、IV级和V级患者数量均有所减少。即干预后两组WDT水平检验均优于干预前,且研究组优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(Z=2.732, P = 0.006)。(2)干预前两组患者GUSS评分和sal - qol比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05);干预后,对照组GUSS评分(16.32±4.26)低于研究组(18.52±4.85)(P < 0.001),对照组s瓦尔- qol评分(116.48±31.05)低于研究组(143.08±33.85)(P < 0.001),干预后两组GUSS评分和s瓦尔- qol均高于干预前(P < 0.001)。(3)与干预前两组营养状况比较,干预前PA、ALB、Hb差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05);干预后,对照组PA、ALB、Hb分别为(218.15±27.15)、(38.67±5.84)。(120.85±31.05),均低于研究组(261.15±22.52)、(42.84±6.32)、(134.18±30.47)(P < 0.01),干预后两组患者PA、ALB、Hb均高于干预前(P < 0.001)。(4)比较两组间TSF、MAMC,干预前TSF、MAMC比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05);干预后,对照组TSF和MAMC分别为(13.84±6.38)和(28.61±4.15),均较低。与研究组(16.94±6.69)、(33.15±3.84)比较(P < 0.001),干预后两组TSF、MAMC均高于干预前(P < 0.001)。(5)比较两组患者的神经功能和肢体功能,干预前NIHSS和FMA比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05);干预后,对照组NIHSS和FMA分别为(19.64±3.52)和(48.15±4.85)。NIHSS高于研究组(16.52±3.85),FMA低于研究组(58.84±5.63)(P < 0.001)。两组患者干预后NIHSS、FMA均优于干预前(P < 0.001)。(6)研究组并发症发生率为4.08%,低于对照组的18.37% (P < 0.05)。结论:FOCUS-PDCA模式下对ACI合并吞咽困难患者的无缝护理管理效果明显。可有效改善患者吞咽功能,减轻神经功能缺损程度,改善患者营养状况和生活质量,并发症少。可在临床应用中推广应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Seamless Care Management Under FOCUS-PDCA for Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction Complicated with Dysphagia and its Influence on Nutritional Status and Neurological Functions.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of seamless care management under FOCUS-PDCA for patients with acute cerebral infarction (ACI) complicated with dysphagia and its influence on nutrition status and neurological functions.

Methods: A total of 98 patients with acute cerebral infarction complicated with dysphagia admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to December 2022 were selected and divided into two groups with equal numbers. The control group received routine nursing management. The study group implemented seamless nursing management under FOCUS-PDCA based on the control group. The therapeutic effect, nutritional status, and neurological function of the two groups were compared before and after intervention. Patients in both groups were intervened for 1 month.

Results: (1) After the intervention, the Water Drinking Test (WDT) Grade I and Grade II of the study group increased from 0.00% before the intervention to 32.65%, and the control group also increased from 0.00% before the intervention to 14.29% and 22.45%. , while the number of Grade III, Grade IV, and Grade V decreased in both the control group and the study group. That is, the WDT level test of both groups after the intervention was better than before the intervention, and the research group was better than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=2.732, P = .006). (2) There was no statistical significance in the GUSS score and SWAL-QOL of the two groups before the intervention (P > .05); after the intervention, the GUSS score of the control group (16.32±4.26) was lower than that of the study group (18.52±4.85) (P < .001) , the SWAL-QOL score of the control group (116.48±31.05) was lower than that of the study group (143.08±33.85) (P < .001), and the GUSS scores and SWAL-QOL of the two groups after the intervention were higher than before the intervention (P < .001). (3) Compared with the nutritional status of the two groups, there was no statistical significance in PA, ALB, and Hb before intervention (P > .05); after intervention, PA, ALB, and Hb in the control group were (218.15±27.15) and (38.67±5.84) respectively. (120.85±31.05), all lower than the study group (261.15±22.52), (42.84±6.32), (134.18±30.47) (P < .01), and the PA, ALB and Hb of the two groups after intervention were all higher than before intervention (P < .001). (4) Comparing TSF and MAMC between the two groups, there was no statistical significance in TSF and MAMC before intervention (P > .05); after intervention, TSF and MAMC in the control group were (13.84±6.38) and (28.61±4.15) respectively, both of which were low. Compared with the study group (16.94±6.69), (33.15±3.84) (P < .001), and the TSF and MAMC of the two groups after the intervention were higher than before the intervention (P < .001). (5) Comparing the neurological function and limb function between the two groups, there was no statistical significance in NIHSS and FMA before intervention (P > .05); after intervention, NIHSS and FMA in the control group were (19.64±3.52) and (48.15±4.85) respectively. The NIHSS was higher than that of the study group (16.52±3.85), and the FMA was lower than that of the study group (58.84±5.63) (P < .001). The NIHSS and FMA of both groups after the intervention were better than those before the intervention (P < .001). (6) The incidence rate of complications in the study group was 4.08%, which was lower than 18.37% in the control group (P < .05).

Conclusion: Seamless nursing management for patients with ACI and dysphagia under the FOCUS-PDCA model has obvious effects. It can effectively improve the patient's swallowing function, reduce the degree of neurological deficit, improve their nutritional status and quality of life, and has fewer complications. It can be used clinically Promote within the application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alternative therapies in health and medicine
Alternative therapies in health and medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.
期刊最新文献
Complete Resolution of Plantar Psoriasis With Ayurveda, A Case Report. Humor and Laughter in Health Promotion Interventions and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Disciplinary Narrative Review. Low Concentrations of Wyethia Helenioides-derived Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory Against Allergic Rhinitis. The Effects of Fisetin on Reducing Biological Aging: A Pilot Study. Circular RNA Pum_0014 Targets miR-146a-5p/NF2 Axis to Regulate VEGF/PAK1 Pathway and Reduce H2O2-induced Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1