对建筑物的概率活载模型的重要回顾:模型,调查,欧洲规范统计和基于可靠性的校准

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structural Safety Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1016/j.strusafe.2023.102411
Luis G.L. Costa, André T. Beck
{"title":"对建筑物的概率活载模型的重要回顾:模型,调查,欧洲规范统计和基于可靠性的校准","authors":"Luis G.L. Costa,&nbsp;André T. Beck","doi":"10.1016/j.strusafe.2023.102411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The appropriate assignment of gravity live loads is of fundamental importance in establishing a design base for safe and economical structures. This paper presents a critical review of the probabilistic modelling<span> of live loads in buildings, providing a historical overview of the theoretical models found in the literature, as well as the load surveys that provided the empirical evidence for their development. As a general rule, these models divide the live load into sustained and extraordinary components, represented as a Poisson square wave and spike processes, respectively, with the differences lying in the underlying hypotheses and process parameters. A comparison of different models is presented, and it is shown that the model parameters currently in use in background documents on the reliability of the Eurocodes do not agree well with survey data, leading to an overestimation of extreme loads. While the Eurocodes lack clear specification regarding the </span></span>exceedance probability for design loads, this study demonstrates, using a model with modified parameters, that the office design load corresponds to an approximate 27% exceedance probability over 50 years for a reference area of 20 m</span><span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span><span>. The impact of employing this model on the reliability-based calibration of the Eurocode partial safety factors for loads is also examined, and it is found that the average reliability falls somewhat below the prescribed 50-year target reliability index of 3.8.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":21978,"journal":{"name":"Structural Safety","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102411"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critical review of probabilistic live load models for buildings: Models, surveys, Eurocode statistics and reliability-based calibration\",\"authors\":\"Luis G.L. Costa,&nbsp;André T. Beck\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.strusafe.2023.102411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>The appropriate assignment of gravity live loads is of fundamental importance in establishing a design base for safe and economical structures. This paper presents a critical review of the probabilistic modelling<span> of live loads in buildings, providing a historical overview of the theoretical models found in the literature, as well as the load surveys that provided the empirical evidence for their development. As a general rule, these models divide the live load into sustained and extraordinary components, represented as a Poisson square wave and spike processes, respectively, with the differences lying in the underlying hypotheses and process parameters. A comparison of different models is presented, and it is shown that the model parameters currently in use in background documents on the reliability of the Eurocodes do not agree well with survey data, leading to an overestimation of extreme loads. While the Eurocodes lack clear specification regarding the </span></span>exceedance probability for design loads, this study demonstrates, using a model with modified parameters, that the office design load corresponds to an approximate 27% exceedance probability over 50 years for a reference area of 20 m</span><span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span><span>. The impact of employing this model on the reliability-based calibration of the Eurocode partial safety factors for loads is also examined, and it is found that the average reliability falls somewhat below the prescribed 50-year target reliability index of 3.8.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structural Safety\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structural Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016747302300098X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016747302300098X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重力活荷载的合理分配对于建立安全、经济的结构设计基础具有重要意义。本文对建筑物活荷载的概率建模进行了批判性的回顾,提供了文献中发现的理论模型的历史概述,以及为其发展提供经验证据的负荷调查。作为一般规则,这些模型将活荷载分为持续和异常组件,分别表示为泊松方波和尖峰过程,其差异在于潜在的假设和过程参数。对不同的模型进行了比较,结果表明,目前欧洲规范可靠性背景文件中使用的模型参数与实测数据不太吻合,导致极端荷载的高估。虽然欧洲规范缺乏关于设计荷载超出概率的明确规范,但本研究表明,使用带有修改参数的模型,对于20平方米的参考面积,办公室设计荷载在50年内的超出概率约为27%。本文还考察了采用该模型对基于可靠性的欧洲规范荷载部分安全系数标定的影响,发现其平均可靠性略低于规定的50年目标可靠性指标3.8。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A critical review of probabilistic live load models for buildings: Models, surveys, Eurocode statistics and reliability-based calibration

The appropriate assignment of gravity live loads is of fundamental importance in establishing a design base for safe and economical structures. This paper presents a critical review of the probabilistic modelling of live loads in buildings, providing a historical overview of the theoretical models found in the literature, as well as the load surveys that provided the empirical evidence for their development. As a general rule, these models divide the live load into sustained and extraordinary components, represented as a Poisson square wave and spike processes, respectively, with the differences lying in the underlying hypotheses and process parameters. A comparison of different models is presented, and it is shown that the model parameters currently in use in background documents on the reliability of the Eurocodes do not agree well with survey data, leading to an overestimation of extreme loads. While the Eurocodes lack clear specification regarding the exceedance probability for design loads, this study demonstrates, using a model with modified parameters, that the office design load corresponds to an approximate 27% exceedance probability over 50 years for a reference area of 20 m2. The impact of employing this model on the reliability-based calibration of the Eurocode partial safety factors for loads is also examined, and it is found that the average reliability falls somewhat below the prescribed 50-year target reliability index of 3.8.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Safety
Structural Safety 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
8.60%
发文量
67
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Structural Safety is an international journal devoted to integrated risk assessment for a wide range of constructed facilities such as buildings, bridges, earth structures, offshore facilities, dams, lifelines and nuclear structural systems. Its purpose is to foster communication about risk and reliability among technical disciplines involved in design and construction, and to enhance the use of risk management in the constructed environment
期刊最新文献
Bivariate cubic normal distribution for non-Gaussian problems Yet another Bayesian active learning reliability analysis method Improved Bayesian model updating of geomaterial parameters for slope reliability assessment considering spatial variability Editorial Board Data-enhanced design charts for efficient reliability-based design of geotechnical systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1