熟能生巧:体外受精治疗过程中认知行为干预对女性感知压力、血浆皮质醇和怀孕率的影响

Johanna Czamanski-Cohen , Orly Sarid , Julie Cwikel , Elihu Levitas , Eitan Lunenfeld , Iris Har-Vardi
{"title":"熟能生巧:体外受精治疗过程中认知行为干预对女性感知压力、血浆皮质醇和怀孕率的影响","authors":"Johanna Czamanski-Cohen ,&nbsp;Orly Sarid ,&nbsp;Julie Cwikel ,&nbsp;Elihu Levitas ,&nbsp;Eitan Lunenfeld ,&nbsp;Iris Har-Vardi","doi":"10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/objectives/introduction</h3><p>Perceived stress and stress reduction interventions have a mixed relationship with fecundity. The objective of this study is to attempt and disentangle these relationships by looking at practicing stress reduction techniques and fecundity and examining their relationship to a behavioral and a neuroendocrine measure of stress.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Fifty nulliparous-infertile women participated in a randomized prospective pilot study with repeated measures to examine the efficacy of cognitive behavioral interventions (CBI) in reducing perceived stress and improving pregnancy rates. Stress measures were taken at T0 (before CBI), T2 (ovum pick up) and T3 (time of pregnancy test).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>We found that women who reported low perceived stress at the beginning of treatment (T0) had a twofold increased chance of becoming pregnant (βhCG &gt;7</span> <!-->mIU/mL) compared to those who reported high-perceived stress, regardless of CBI. Women who received CBI reported reduced perceived stress at the time of the pregnancy test (T3). Women who engaged in daily practice of CBI had significantly higher pregnancy rates compared to those who did not practice.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>It may be beneficial for women who have high perceived stress levels to learn and practice stress reduction techniques before beginning IVF treatment, and continue to practice daily during IVF treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":91915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.09.001","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practice makes perfect: The effect of cognitive behavioral interventions during IVF treatments on women's perceived stress, plasma cortisol and pregnancy rates\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Czamanski-Cohen ,&nbsp;Orly Sarid ,&nbsp;Julie Cwikel ,&nbsp;Elihu Levitas ,&nbsp;Eitan Lunenfeld ,&nbsp;Iris Har-Vardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background/objectives/introduction</h3><p>Perceived stress and stress reduction interventions have a mixed relationship with fecundity. The objective of this study is to attempt and disentangle these relationships by looking at practicing stress reduction techniques and fecundity and examining their relationship to a behavioral and a neuroendocrine measure of stress.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Fifty nulliparous-infertile women participated in a randomized prospective pilot study with repeated measures to examine the efficacy of cognitive behavioral interventions (CBI) in reducing perceived stress and improving pregnancy rates. Stress measures were taken at T0 (before CBI), T2 (ovum pick up) and T3 (time of pregnancy test).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>We found that women who reported low perceived stress at the beginning of treatment (T0) had a twofold increased chance of becoming pregnant (βhCG &gt;7</span> <!-->mIU/mL) compared to those who reported high-perceived stress, regardless of CBI. Women who received CBI reported reduced perceived stress at the time of the pregnancy test (T3). Women who engaged in daily practice of CBI had significantly higher pregnancy rates compared to those who did not practice.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>It may be beneficial for women who have high perceived stress levels to learn and practice stress reduction techniques before beginning IVF treatment, and continue to practice daily during IVF treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reproductive health and medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.09.001\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reproductive health and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214420X16300183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214420X16300183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景/目的/介绍感知压力和减轻压力的干预措施与繁殖力有复杂的关系。本研究的目的是通过观察练习减压技术和生育能力,并检查它们与压力的行为和神经内分泌测量的关系,试图理清这些关系。材料和方法50名无生育不孕症妇女参加了一项随机前瞻性先导研究,通过重复测量来检验认知行为干预(CBI)在减少感知压力和提高妊娠率方面的疗效。分别于T0 (CBI前)、T2(取卵)和T3(妊娠试验时间)进行应激测量。结果我们发现,在治疗开始时报告低感知压力的妇女(T0)与报告高感知压力的妇女相比,怀孕的机会增加了两倍(βhCG >7 mIU/mL),无论CBI如何。接受CBI的妇女在妊娠试验(T3)时报告的感知压力减少。从事CBI日常实践的妇女的怀孕率明显高于没有实践的妇女。结论高应激水平的妇女在体外受精治疗前学习和练习减压技术,并在体外受精治疗期间每天继续练习可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Practice makes perfect: The effect of cognitive behavioral interventions during IVF treatments on women's perceived stress, plasma cortisol and pregnancy rates

Background/objectives/introduction

Perceived stress and stress reduction interventions have a mixed relationship with fecundity. The objective of this study is to attempt and disentangle these relationships by looking at practicing stress reduction techniques and fecundity and examining their relationship to a behavioral and a neuroendocrine measure of stress.

Materials and methods

Fifty nulliparous-infertile women participated in a randomized prospective pilot study with repeated measures to examine the efficacy of cognitive behavioral interventions (CBI) in reducing perceived stress and improving pregnancy rates. Stress measures were taken at T0 (before CBI), T2 (ovum pick up) and T3 (time of pregnancy test).

Results

We found that women who reported low perceived stress at the beginning of treatment (T0) had a twofold increased chance of becoming pregnant (βhCG >7 mIU/mL) compared to those who reported high-perceived stress, regardless of CBI. Women who received CBI reported reduced perceived stress at the time of the pregnancy test (T3). Women who engaged in daily practice of CBI had significantly higher pregnancy rates compared to those who did not practice.

Conclusions

It may be beneficial for women who have high perceived stress levels to learn and practice stress reduction techniques before beginning IVF treatment, and continue to practice daily during IVF treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fate of the germ cells in mammalian ovary: A review Endocrine disruption and female reproductive health: Implications on cross-talk between endocrine and autocrine/paracrine axes in the ovary Cyclic nucleotides regulate oocyte meiotic maturation and quality in mammals Gene profiling the window of implantation: Microarray analyses from human and rodent models Does elevated serum progesterone on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration decrease live birth rates?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1