{"title":"现行国际仲裁规则的排他性比较","authors":"Russ Bleemer","doi":"10.1002/alt.22022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>On Page 167 inside, <i>Alternatives</i> presents a special full-issue feature comparison of the current rules from five major administrative bodies in the international arbitration field. When using the rules, best practice is to check the latest versions for the exact current wording in the comparison categories, available at the organizations' websites listed at the top of the chart.</p>","PeriodicalId":100074,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","volume":"41 11","pages":"165-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Exclusive Comparison of Selected, Current International Arbitration Rules\",\"authors\":\"Russ Bleemer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alt.22022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>On Page 167 inside, <i>Alternatives</i> presents a special full-issue feature comparison of the current rules from five major administrative bodies in the international arbitration field. When using the rules, best practice is to check the latest versions for the exact current wording in the comparison categories, available at the organizations' websites listed at the top of the chart.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation\",\"volume\":\"41 11\",\"pages\":\"165-180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.22022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.22022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Exclusive Comparison of Selected, Current International Arbitration Rules
On Page 167 inside, Alternatives presents a special full-issue feature comparison of the current rules from five major administrative bodies in the international arbitration field. When using the rules, best practice is to check the latest versions for the exact current wording in the comparison categories, available at the organizations' websites listed at the top of the chart.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
