急性脑卒中患者躯干损伤量表的反应性及微小临床意义差异研究。

0 REHABILITATION Advances in rehabilitation science and practice Pub Date : 2023-11-20 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536351231211718
Masahiro Ishiwatari, Tsuyoshi Takahara, Masato Hayakawa, Akihiro Ogawa, Satoshi Kido
{"title":"急性脑卒中患者躯干损伤量表的反应性及微小临床意义差异研究。","authors":"Masahiro Ishiwatari, Tsuyoshi Takahara, Masato Hayakawa, Akihiro Ogawa, Satoshi Kido","doi":"10.1177/27536351231211718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trunk function is a prerequisite for functional activity; thus, it is crucial to carry out proper assessments and interventions. However, there is no clear indicator for trunk function evaluation in patients with stroke. To understand the effects of interventions over time, it is important to adopt responsive clinical indicators.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) (Fujiwara version) in terms of responsiveness and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 55 patients who experienced an acute stroke were evaluated on the seventh day of hospitalization and the day before discharge. The responsiveness of the TIS was assessed by the effect size and standardized response mean (SRM). Additionally, an MCID study was conducted to examine the amount of change in TIS scores required to indicate a clinically meaningful change, which was determined by the presence or absence of improvement in the activities of daily living.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SRM of the TIS was 1.42. Additionally, the MCID was determined to be 3 points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TIS score improved over time and a 3-point improvement in the TIS score was associated with improvement in the activities of daily living. Thus, this scale's clinical sensitivity and MCID have been established in patients with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":72107,"journal":{"name":"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of the Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Trunk Impairment Scale in Patients With Acute Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Masahiro Ishiwatari, Tsuyoshi Takahara, Masato Hayakawa, Akihiro Ogawa, Satoshi Kido\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27536351231211718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trunk function is a prerequisite for functional activity; thus, it is crucial to carry out proper assessments and interventions. However, there is no clear indicator for trunk function evaluation in patients with stroke. To understand the effects of interventions over time, it is important to adopt responsive clinical indicators.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) (Fujiwara version) in terms of responsiveness and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 55 patients who experienced an acute stroke were evaluated on the seventh day of hospitalization and the day before discharge. The responsiveness of the TIS was assessed by the effect size and standardized response mean (SRM). Additionally, an MCID study was conducted to examine the amount of change in TIS scores required to indicate a clinically meaningful change, which was determined by the presence or absence of improvement in the activities of daily living.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SRM of the TIS was 1.42. Additionally, the MCID was determined to be 3 points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TIS score improved over time and a 3-point improvement in the TIS score was associated with improvement in the activities of daily living. Thus, this scale's clinical sensitivity and MCID have been established in patients with stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664440/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536351231211718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536351231211718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:主干功能是功能活动的先决条件;因此,进行适当的评估和干预至关重要。然而,脑卒中患者躯干功能评价尚无明确指标。为了了解干预措施的长期效果,采用响应性临床指标是很重要的。目的:检验躯干损伤量表(TIS) (Fujiwara版本)在反应性和最小临床重要差异(MCID)方面的差异。方法:对55例急性脑卒中患者在入院第7天及出院前进行评估。通过效应量和标准化反应均值(SRM)评估TIS的反应性。此外,进行了一项MCID研究,以检查TIS评分的变化量,以表明临床有意义的变化,这是由日常生活活动是否改善决定的。结果:TIS的SRM为1.42。此外,MCID被确定为3分。结论:TIS评分随着时间的推移而改善,TIS评分的3分改善与日常生活活动的改善有关。由此建立了该量表在脑卒中患者中的临床敏感性和MCID。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study of the Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Trunk Impairment Scale in Patients With Acute Stroke.

Background: Trunk function is a prerequisite for functional activity; thus, it is crucial to carry out proper assessments and interventions. However, there is no clear indicator for trunk function evaluation in patients with stroke. To understand the effects of interventions over time, it is important to adopt responsive clinical indicators.

Purpose: To examine the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) (Fujiwara version) in terms of responsiveness and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

Methods: In total, 55 patients who experienced an acute stroke were evaluated on the seventh day of hospitalization and the day before discharge. The responsiveness of the TIS was assessed by the effect size and standardized response mean (SRM). Additionally, an MCID study was conducted to examine the amount of change in TIS scores required to indicate a clinically meaningful change, which was determined by the presence or absence of improvement in the activities of daily living.

Results: The SRM of the TIS was 1.42. Additionally, the MCID was determined to be 3 points.

Conclusion: The TIS score improved over time and a 3-point improvement in the TIS score was associated with improvement in the activities of daily living. Thus, this scale's clinical sensitivity and MCID have been established in patients with stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Qualitative Analysis of the Lived Experience of Individuals After Undergoing Osseointegration for Transfemoral Amputation. Feasibility of Freedom of Information Requests for Amputee Epidemiology in the United Kingdom. Floor-hugging Intervention: A Perspective on Floor Exposure and After-Fall Contingency Intervention. Clinical Determinants of Knee Joint Loads While Sidestepping: An Exploratory Study With Male Rugby Union Athletes. Primary Motor Area Activity in Phantom Limb Imagery of Traumatic Unilateral Lower Limb Amputees With Phantom Limb Pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1