研究38个国家学生对教学质量看法的可比性

Bas Senden , Nani Teig , Trude Nilsen
{"title":"研究38个国家学生对教学质量看法的可比性","authors":"Bas Senden ,&nbsp;Nani Teig ,&nbsp;Trude Nilsen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Student perceptions are rarely used to compare teaching quality across countries due to the challenge of ensuring a comparable construct or achieving exact measurement invariance. The present study aims to evaluate the extent to which student perceptions of teaching quality can be used for valid cross-national comparisons. To this end, the study aims to overcome challenges associated with traditional measurement invariance by applying a novel method – <em>alignment optimization.</em> Based on data from 38 countries from the 2019 Trends in Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), our results showed limited comparability across countries with variation between behavioral management and instructional clarity scales. We review potential causes of non-comparability using the estimated mean scores. Implications for further research are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374023000845/pdfft?md5=390d9bbf89f83e174808d5e861756458&pid=1-s2.0-S2666374023000845-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studying the comparability of student perceptions of teaching quality across 38 countries\",\"authors\":\"Bas Senden ,&nbsp;Nani Teig ,&nbsp;Trude Nilsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Student perceptions are rarely used to compare teaching quality across countries due to the challenge of ensuring a comparable construct or achieving exact measurement invariance. The present study aims to evaluate the extent to which student perceptions of teaching quality can be used for valid cross-national comparisons. To this end, the study aims to overcome challenges associated with traditional measurement invariance by applying a novel method – <em>alignment optimization.</em> Based on data from 38 countries from the 2019 Trends in Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), our results showed limited comparability across countries with variation between behavioral management and instructional clarity scales. We review potential causes of non-comparability using the estimated mean scores. Implications for further research are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of educational research open\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374023000845/pdfft?md5=390d9bbf89f83e174808d5e861756458&pid=1-s2.0-S2666374023000845-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of educational research open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374023000845\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374023000845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学生的看法很少被用来比较各国的教学质量,因为要确保一个可比的结构或实现精确的测量不变性是一项挑战。本研究旨在评估学生对教学质量的看法在多大程度上可以用于有效的跨国比较。为此,本研究提出了一种新的测量方法——对准优化方法,以克服传统测量不变性所带来的挑战。根据2019年数学和科学趋势研究(TIMSS)中来自38个国家的数据,我们的结果显示,各国之间的可比性有限,行为管理和教学清晰度量表之间存在差异。我们使用估计的平均分数来回顾不可比较性的潜在原因。讨论了进一步研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Studying the comparability of student perceptions of teaching quality across 38 countries

Student perceptions are rarely used to compare teaching quality across countries due to the challenge of ensuring a comparable construct or achieving exact measurement invariance. The present study aims to evaluate the extent to which student perceptions of teaching quality can be used for valid cross-national comparisons. To this end, the study aims to overcome challenges associated with traditional measurement invariance by applying a novel method – alignment optimization. Based on data from 38 countries from the 2019 Trends in Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), our results showed limited comparability across countries with variation between behavioral management and instructional clarity scales. We review potential causes of non-comparability using the estimated mean scores. Implications for further research are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Navigating the virtual landscape: A systematic review of approaches to cultivating a sense of community among distance learners in health and allied health disciplines Approaching a substantive theory of moral reckoning in special education leadership: Innovative grounded theory methods using extant data on principals An assessment of the Education Management Information System in Sierra Leone and potential for enhanced disability inclusiveness AI chatbots: A disguised enemy for academic integrity? The role of students’ perceived teacher support in student motivation: A longitudinal study of student motivation profiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1