“我们不是叛乱者”:政治新闻采访中的问责制和成员类别谈判

IF 2.3 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Discourse Context & Media Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100743
Abdulrahman Alroumi
{"title":"“我们不是叛乱者”:政治新闻采访中的问责制和成员类别谈判","authors":"Abdulrahman Alroumi","doi":"10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper observes the emergence of membership categories and their role in the construction of accountability in news interview interactions on two Arabic networks. It adopts a Membership Categorisation Analysis (MCA) to analyse how these categories contribute to the design of interviewers’ questions and interviewees’ answers. The data include twenty-eight hours of recorded Arab news interviews from four shows. The findings demonstrate that there are three interactional patterns in which membership categories are invoked. In the first pattern, interviewees engage in negotiating their incumbency or their political allies in accountable categories in interviewers’ questions. In the second pattern, interviewees display membership categories to obviate the shown accountability, while in the third pattern, they show negation of their incumbency of some categories even though they have not been explicitly included in these categories in interviewers’ questions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46649,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Context & Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘We are not putschists’: Accountability and the negotiation of membership categories in political news interviews\",\"authors\":\"Abdulrahman Alroumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper observes the emergence of membership categories and their role in the construction of accountability in news interview interactions on two Arabic networks. It adopts a Membership Categorisation Analysis (MCA) to analyse how these categories contribute to the design of interviewers’ questions and interviewees’ answers. The data include twenty-eight hours of recorded Arab news interviews from four shows. The findings demonstrate that there are three interactional patterns in which membership categories are invoked. In the first pattern, interviewees engage in negotiating their incumbency or their political allies in accountable categories in interviewers’ questions. In the second pattern, interviewees display membership categories to obviate the shown accountability, while in the third pattern, they show negation of their incumbency of some categories even though they have not been explicitly included in these categories in interviewers’ questions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discourse Context & Media\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discourse Context & Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695823000764\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Context & Media","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695823000764","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文观察了两个阿拉伯网络新闻采访互动中成员类别的出现及其在问责制构建中的作用。它采用成员分类分析(MCA)来分析这些类别如何有助于设计采访者的问题和受访者的答案。这些数据包括来自四个节目的28小时的阿拉伯新闻采访记录。研究结果表明,有三种交互模式可以调用成员类别。在第一种模式中,采访者在采访者的问题中以可问责的类别来谈判他们的在职或他们的政治盟友。在第二种模式中,受访者表现出成员类别,以消除所显示的责任,而在第三种模式中,他们表现出对某些类别的在职者的否定,即使他们在面试官的问题中没有明确地包括在这些类别中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘We are not putschists’: Accountability and the negotiation of membership categories in political news interviews

This paper observes the emergence of membership categories and their role in the construction of accountability in news interview interactions on two Arabic networks. It adopts a Membership Categorisation Analysis (MCA) to analyse how these categories contribute to the design of interviewers’ questions and interviewees’ answers. The data include twenty-eight hours of recorded Arab news interviews from four shows. The findings demonstrate that there are three interactional patterns in which membership categories are invoked. In the first pattern, interviewees engage in negotiating their incumbency or their political allies in accountable categories in interviewers’ questions. In the second pattern, interviewees display membership categories to obviate the shown accountability, while in the third pattern, they show negation of their incumbency of some categories even though they have not been explicitly included in these categories in interviewers’ questions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Discourse Context & Media
Discourse Context & Media COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
Scaling as method: A three-stage, mixed-methods approach to digital discourse analysis Sharing second stories in online comforting interactions Surveillance at the (inter)face: A nexus analysis Transmodal messenger interaction–Analysing the sequentiality of text and audio postings in WhatsApp chats Digital facilitation-as-a-process: The mismatch between promotional text and situated interaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1