关系恶性循环与夫妻慢性冲突的实证研究

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI:10.1007/s10879-023-09607-5
Fiorenza Eleonora, Crisafulli Valeria, Carpentieri Renato, Emma De Luca, Clarissa Di Filippo, Michela La Stella, Leonardi Jessica, Mannocchi Camilla, Rodomonti Martina, Rosi Laura, Santodoro Marianna, Gazzillo Francesco
{"title":"关系恶性循环与夫妻慢性冲突的实证研究","authors":"Fiorenza Eleonora, Crisafulli Valeria, Carpentieri Renato, Emma De Luca, Clarissa Di Filippo, Michela La Stella, Leonardi Jessica, Mannocchi Camilla, Rodomonti Martina, Rosi Laura, Santodoro Marianna, Gazzillo Francesco","doi":"10.1007/s10879-023-09607-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study aims to empirically assess the control-mastery theory hypothesis that considers chronic couple conflictuality as the repetition of relational vicious circles—that is, interactions where both partners test their pathogenic beliefs and fail their reciprocal tests, confirming their reciprocal pathogenic beliefs. In addition, the study aims to verify if interpersonal guilt is more activated during couple conflicts. Our study involved 11 couples treated by four experienced therapists and nine trained, independent judges who, after reading verbatim transcripts of the couples’ psychotherapy sessions, used the Patient Scale of Couple Testing (PSCT), and the Patient Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale (PIGRS) to rate segments of couple sessions. The results were obtained by applying generalized estimating equations and confirm our hypotheses: we could observe a greater presence of testing activity and confirmation of pathogenic beliefs in segments classified as conflictual for both partners and a stronger presence of interpersonal guilt in conflictual versus nonconflictual interactions. These findings support the idea that conflict interactions can be seen as failed attempts by both partners to disconfirm their pathogenic beliefs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46994,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY","volume":"21 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vicious Relational Circles and Chronic Couple Conflictuality: An Empirical Study\",\"authors\":\"Fiorenza Eleonora, Crisafulli Valeria, Carpentieri Renato, Emma De Luca, Clarissa Di Filippo, Michela La Stella, Leonardi Jessica, Mannocchi Camilla, Rodomonti Martina, Rosi Laura, Santodoro Marianna, Gazzillo Francesco\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10879-023-09607-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The study aims to empirically assess the control-mastery theory hypothesis that considers chronic couple conflictuality as the repetition of relational vicious circles—that is, interactions where both partners test their pathogenic beliefs and fail their reciprocal tests, confirming their reciprocal pathogenic beliefs. In addition, the study aims to verify if interpersonal guilt is more activated during couple conflicts. Our study involved 11 couples treated by four experienced therapists and nine trained, independent judges who, after reading verbatim transcripts of the couples’ psychotherapy sessions, used the Patient Scale of Couple Testing (PSCT), and the Patient Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale (PIGRS) to rate segments of couple sessions. The results were obtained by applying generalized estimating equations and confirm our hypotheses: we could observe a greater presence of testing activity and confirmation of pathogenic beliefs in segments classified as conflictual for both partners and a stronger presence of interpersonal guilt in conflictual versus nonconflictual interactions. These findings support the idea that conflict interactions can be seen as failed attempts by both partners to disconfirm their pathogenic beliefs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-023-09607-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-023-09607-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在实证评估控制-掌握理论假设,该假设认为长期夫妻冲突是关系恶性循环的重复,即,双方在相互作用中测试他们的致病信念,并通过互惠测试,确认他们的互惠致病信念。此外,本研究旨在验证人际内疚是否在夫妻冲突中更容易被激活。我们的研究涉及11对夫妇,由4名经验丰富的治疗师和9名训练有素的独立法官进行治疗,他们在阅读了夫妻心理治疗的逐字记录后,使用夫妻测试患者量表(PSCT)和患者人际内疚评定量表(PIGRS)对夫妻治疗的各个部分进行评分。结果是通过应用广义估计方程得到的,并证实了我们的假设:我们可以观察到,在双方被归类为冲突的片段中,测试活动和致病信念的确认更大,在冲突与非冲突的互动中,人际内疚的存在更强。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即冲突互动可以被视为双方试图推翻其致病信念的失败尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vicious Relational Circles and Chronic Couple Conflictuality: An Empirical Study

The study aims to empirically assess the control-mastery theory hypothesis that considers chronic couple conflictuality as the repetition of relational vicious circles—that is, interactions where both partners test their pathogenic beliefs and fail their reciprocal tests, confirming their reciprocal pathogenic beliefs. In addition, the study aims to verify if interpersonal guilt is more activated during couple conflicts. Our study involved 11 couples treated by four experienced therapists and nine trained, independent judges who, after reading verbatim transcripts of the couples’ psychotherapy sessions, used the Patient Scale of Couple Testing (PSCT), and the Patient Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale (PIGRS) to rate segments of couple sessions. The results were obtained by applying generalized estimating equations and confirm our hypotheses: we could observe a greater presence of testing activity and confirmation of pathogenic beliefs in segments classified as conflictual for both partners and a stronger presence of interpersonal guilt in conflictual versus nonconflictual interactions. These findings support the idea that conflict interactions can be seen as failed attempts by both partners to disconfirm their pathogenic beliefs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy provides an international forum to critique the complexities and controversies facing psychotherapists. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed articles that critically analyze theory, research, or clinical practice. Empirical studies, panel discussions, essays, case studies, brief reports, and theoretical articles are published. Psychotherapists and clinical researchers will find this journal an important vehicle to review the problems of treating a variety of patients.
期刊最新文献
Personalized Context-Sensitive Emotion-Focused Therapy Transdiagnostic Emotion-Focused Therapy for Couples with Co-Morbid Relational and Mood, Anxiety and Related Difficulties An Integrative Model to Increase Client Motivation During the Psychotherapy Process Are Therapist Effects More Crucial than We Thought? The Timelessness of the Scar in the Borderline Personality Disorder BPD: A Systemic Intervention in a Case of Child Sexual Abuse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1