沃森的福克纳:最杰出的贡献

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM MISSISSIPPI QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1353/mss.2022.a913486
Ahmed Honeini
{"title":"沃森的福克纳:最杰出的贡献","authors":"Ahmed Honeini","doi":"10.1353/mss.2022.a913486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Watson’s Faulkner: <span>A Most Splendid Contribution</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Ahmed Honeini </li> </ul> <p>J<small>ay</small> W<small>atson</small>, H<small>owry</small> P<small>rofessor of</small> F<small>aulkner</small> S<small>tudies at the</small> University of Mississippi, is widely considered one of the leading authorities on Faulkner working today. His latest offerings, <em>William Faulkner and the Faces of Modernity</em> (2019) and its companion volume <em>Fossil Fuel Faulkner: Energy, Modernity, and the US South</em> (2022) are insightful, well-argued, and welcome contributions to the field. Throughout both books, Watson displays a confident command of his topic, evincing an intimate, acute knowledge of Faulkner’s centrality within the modernist canon and, indeed, the key scholarly debates surrounding modernism more broadly. Watson’s “hope” for both books is that “by returning to the utterly uncontroversial fact of Faulkner’s modernism with a critical sensibility sharpened by new modernism studies,” his scholarship “will spark further reappraisal of [Faulkner’s] distinguished and quite dazzling” oeuvre (<em>Faces of Modernity</em> 37). Watson deftly achieves his aim with systematic rigor across both volumes, engaging his readers with fluency, cogency, and lyricism.</p> <p>In <em>William Faulkner and the Faces of Modernity</em>, Watson divides his scholarly attention across five distinct yet interconnected concepts: rural modernization, technology and media, racial modernities, and biopolitical modernity. The book opens with an examination of modernity’s impact on rural Mississippi in <em>As I Lay Dying</em> and three short stories: “Mules in the Yard,” “Shingles for the Lord,” and “Barn Burning.” In these works, the rural South of the early twentieth century may outwardly appear to be diametrically opposed to—and, indeed, fundamentally incapable of embracing—modernity. Watson argues, however, that these texts in fact demonstrate that families like the Bundrens and the Snopeses take an active role in modernization:</p> <blockquote> <p>for a select group of Faulkner’s rural subjects, modernization isn’t something that the novelist, from his privileged regional vantage point, can see <em>happening</em> to them, <strong>[End Page 453]</strong> radiating outward from town and more distant centers of capitalist development, so much as something he watches them <em>do</em>, something they bring with them into the hamlets, towns, and cities they subsequently shock, energize, and estrange.</p> (44) </blockquote> <p>As such, the opening chapter of <em>Faces of Modernity</em> offer a riposte to any reader or scholar of Faulkner and southern fiction tempted to assert that passivity or resistance to the processes of modernization is a key theme which dominates these works, <em>As I Lay Dying</em> in particular. Such readings, Watson observes, disproportionately focus on modernity’s “impact on rural people [as] a form of victimization. . . . disempowerment, disorientation, [and] even disarticulation” (65). By challenging this well-entrenched characterization of modernity in Faulkner’s works as enforced upon rather than embraced by his rural denizens, Watson urges all future Faulkner scholars to reorient their perspective on the pastoral South as a whole and across time.</p> <p>Watson then offers a fascinating materialist reading of <em>Light in August</em> that links Jefferson’s “material economy involving the industrial production and distribution of timber, lumber, and other wood products” (75) with the corporeal experiences of the novel’s central characters, specifically the ill-fated and marginalized Joe Christmas. Watson’s reading culminates in an ingenuous and haunting connection between the violence Joe experiences at the hands of a lynch mob led by the white supremacist Percy Grimm and the planing machine he utilizes during his brief stint at Doane’s Mill at the beginning of the novel. The savagery Grimm inflicts upon Joe strips him of his humanity, rendering him an inanimate, mechanical object by forcing him “through the planer, in a hideous ‘surfacing’ operation that exposes the brutal logic of small-town social norms” (81). While Watson does not explicitly link this moment to works such as <em>Sister Carrie</em> or <em>Lady Chatterley’s Lover</em>, his observation here could potentially provide fruitful new insights and comparisons of Faulkner’s work with Dreiser’s and Lawrence’s (to name only two of several possible authors), namely the ways in which modernist novels depict the dehumanization of mechanical modernity, beyond both the South and the borders of the United States itself.</p> <p>Following on from the technologically-minded reading of <em>Light in August</em>, Watson offers fresh perspectives on the central role of the automobile and the airplane...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":35190,"journal":{"name":"MISSISSIPPI QUARTERLY","volume":"106 S6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Watson's Faulkner: A Most Splendid Contribution\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Honeini\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/mss.2022.a913486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Watson’s Faulkner: <span>A Most Splendid Contribution</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Ahmed Honeini </li> </ul> <p>J<small>ay</small> W<small>atson</small>, H<small>owry</small> P<small>rofessor of</small> F<small>aulkner</small> S<small>tudies at the</small> University of Mississippi, is widely considered one of the leading authorities on Faulkner working today. His latest offerings, <em>William Faulkner and the Faces of Modernity</em> (2019) and its companion volume <em>Fossil Fuel Faulkner: Energy, Modernity, and the US South</em> (2022) are insightful, well-argued, and welcome contributions to the field. Throughout both books, Watson displays a confident command of his topic, evincing an intimate, acute knowledge of Faulkner’s centrality within the modernist canon and, indeed, the key scholarly debates surrounding modernism more broadly. Watson’s “hope” for both books is that “by returning to the utterly uncontroversial fact of Faulkner’s modernism with a critical sensibility sharpened by new modernism studies,” his scholarship “will spark further reappraisal of [Faulkner’s] distinguished and quite dazzling” oeuvre (<em>Faces of Modernity</em> 37). Watson deftly achieves his aim with systematic rigor across both volumes, engaging his readers with fluency, cogency, and lyricism.</p> <p>In <em>William Faulkner and the Faces of Modernity</em>, Watson divides his scholarly attention across five distinct yet interconnected concepts: rural modernization, technology and media, racial modernities, and biopolitical modernity. The book opens with an examination of modernity’s impact on rural Mississippi in <em>As I Lay Dying</em> and three short stories: “Mules in the Yard,” “Shingles for the Lord,” and “Barn Burning.” In these works, the rural South of the early twentieth century may outwardly appear to be diametrically opposed to—and, indeed, fundamentally incapable of embracing—modernity. Watson argues, however, that these texts in fact demonstrate that families like the Bundrens and the Snopeses take an active role in modernization:</p> <blockquote> <p>for a select group of Faulkner’s rural subjects, modernization isn’t something that the novelist, from his privileged regional vantage point, can see <em>happening</em> to them, <strong>[End Page 453]</strong> radiating outward from town and more distant centers of capitalist development, so much as something he watches them <em>do</em>, something they bring with them into the hamlets, towns, and cities they subsequently shock, energize, and estrange.</p> (44) </blockquote> <p>As such, the opening chapter of <em>Faces of Modernity</em> offer a riposte to any reader or scholar of Faulkner and southern fiction tempted to assert that passivity or resistance to the processes of modernization is a key theme which dominates these works, <em>As I Lay Dying</em> in particular. Such readings, Watson observes, disproportionately focus on modernity’s “impact on rural people [as] a form of victimization. . . . disempowerment, disorientation, [and] even disarticulation” (65). By challenging this well-entrenched characterization of modernity in Faulkner’s works as enforced upon rather than embraced by his rural denizens, Watson urges all future Faulkner scholars to reorient their perspective on the pastoral South as a whole and across time.</p> <p>Watson then offers a fascinating materialist reading of <em>Light in August</em> that links Jefferson’s “material economy involving the industrial production and distribution of timber, lumber, and other wood products” (75) with the corporeal experiences of the novel’s central characters, specifically the ill-fated and marginalized Joe Christmas. Watson’s reading culminates in an ingenuous and haunting connection between the violence Joe experiences at the hands of a lynch mob led by the white supremacist Percy Grimm and the planing machine he utilizes during his brief stint at Doane’s Mill at the beginning of the novel. The savagery Grimm inflicts upon Joe strips him of his humanity, rendering him an inanimate, mechanical object by forcing him “through the planer, in a hideous ‘surfacing’ operation that exposes the brutal logic of small-town social norms” (81). While Watson does not explicitly link this moment to works such as <em>Sister Carrie</em> or <em>Lady Chatterley’s Lover</em>, his observation here could potentially provide fruitful new insights and comparisons of Faulkner’s work with Dreiser’s and Lawrence’s (to name only two of several possible authors), namely the ways in which modernist novels depict the dehumanization of mechanical modernity, beyond both the South and the borders of the United States itself.</p> <p>Following on from the technologically-minded reading of <em>Light in August</em>, Watson offers fresh perspectives on the central role of the automobile and the airplane...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MISSISSIPPI QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"106 S6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MISSISSIPPI QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/mss.2022.a913486\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MISSISSIPPI QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mss.2022.a913486","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了代替摘要,这里有一个简短的内容摘录:沃森的福克纳:最杰出的贡献艾哈迈德·霍内尼杰伊·沃森,密西西比大学福克纳研究的豪里教授,被广泛认为是当今福克纳研究的主要权威之一。他的最新著作《威廉·福克纳和现代性的面孔》(2019年)及其配套著作《化石燃料福克纳:能源、现代性和美国南方》(2022年)是对该领域的深刻见解、充分论证和受欢迎的贡献。在这两本书中,沃森对自己的主题表现出了自信的把握,对福克纳在现代主义经典中的中心地位,以及围绕现代主义的更广泛的关键学术辩论,表现出了一种亲密而敏锐的认识。沃森对这两本书的“希望”是“通过回归福克纳的现代主义这一完全没有争议的事实,以及新现代主义研究所增强的批判敏感性”,他的学术研究“将引发对[福克纳]杰出而令人眼花缭乱的”作品的进一步重新评价(《现代性的面孔》第37期)。沃森巧妙地实现了他的目标,系统严谨地贯穿了两卷书,以流畅、有力和抒情吸引了读者。在《威廉·福克纳与现代性的面孔》一书中,沃森将他的学术注意力分为五个截然不同但又相互关联的概念:农村现代化、技术和媒体、种族现代性和生物政治现代性。这本书以《我弥生之际》和三个短篇小说《院子里的骡子》、《献给上帝的瓦》和《燃烧的谷仓》开篇,考察了现代性对密西西比农村的影响。在这些作品中,二十世纪早期的南方乡村从表面上看似乎与现代截然相反,实际上根本无法拥抱现代。然而,沃森认为,这些文本实际上表明,像班德伦和斯诺佩斯这样的家庭在现代化中发挥了积极的作用:对于福克纳笔下的一群农村人来说,现代化并不是小说家从他优越的地域优势上看到的发生在他们身上的事情,而是从城镇和更遥远的资本主义发展中心向外辐射的事情,而是他看到他们所做的事情,他们把这些事情带到他们随后震惊、激励和疏远的村庄、城镇和城市。(44)因此,《现代性的面孔》的第一章对福克纳和南方小说的任何读者或学者都提出了反驳,这些读者或学者试图断言,对现代化进程的被动或抵抗是主导这些作品的一个关键主题,尤其是当我奄奄一息的时候。沃森观察到,这样的解读不成比例地把重点放在了现代性“作为一种受害形式对农村人民的影响. . . .”上剥夺权力,迷失方向,甚至失去联系”(65)。通过挑战福克纳作品中对现代性的根深蒂固的刻画,认为它是被强加的,而不是被他的农村居民所接受的,沃森敦促所有未来的福克纳学者重新定位他们对整个田园南方的看法,并跨越时间。随后,沃森对《八月之光》进行了引人入胜的唯物主义解读,将杰斐逊的“涉及木材、木材和其他木制品的工业生产和分配的物质经济”(75)与小说中心人物的肉体经历联系起来,尤其是命运多舛、被边缘化的乔·克里斯莫斯。在小说的开头,乔在白人至上主义者珀西·格林(Percy Grimm)领导的暴民手中遭受的暴力与他在多恩磨坊(Doane’s Mill)短暂工作期间使用的机床之间建立了一种坦率而令人难忘的联系,华生的阅读达到了高潮。野蛮的格林把乔的人性剥夺了,把他变成了一个没有生命的机械物体,强迫他“通过刨床,在一个丑陋的‘表面’操作中,暴露了小镇社会规范的残酷逻辑”(81)。虽然沃森没有明确地将这一时刻与《嘉莉妹妹》或《查泰莱夫人的情人》等作品联系起来,但他在这里的观察可能会提供富有成效的新见解,并将福克纳的作品与德莱塞和劳伦斯的作品(仅举几个可能的作者中的两个)进行比较,即现代主义小说描绘机械现代性的非人性化的方式,超越了南方和美国本身的边界。继《八月之光》的科技阅读之后,沃森对汽车和飞机的核心作用提供了新的视角……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Watson's Faulkner: A Most Splendid Contribution
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Watson’s Faulkner: A Most Splendid Contribution
  • Ahmed Honeini

Jay Watson, Howry Professor of Faulkner Studies at the University of Mississippi, is widely considered one of the leading authorities on Faulkner working today. His latest offerings, William Faulkner and the Faces of Modernity (2019) and its companion volume Fossil Fuel Faulkner: Energy, Modernity, and the US South (2022) are insightful, well-argued, and welcome contributions to the field. Throughout both books, Watson displays a confident command of his topic, evincing an intimate, acute knowledge of Faulkner’s centrality within the modernist canon and, indeed, the key scholarly debates surrounding modernism more broadly. Watson’s “hope” for both books is that “by returning to the utterly uncontroversial fact of Faulkner’s modernism with a critical sensibility sharpened by new modernism studies,” his scholarship “will spark further reappraisal of [Faulkner’s] distinguished and quite dazzling” oeuvre (Faces of Modernity 37). Watson deftly achieves his aim with systematic rigor across both volumes, engaging his readers with fluency, cogency, and lyricism.

In William Faulkner and the Faces of Modernity, Watson divides his scholarly attention across five distinct yet interconnected concepts: rural modernization, technology and media, racial modernities, and biopolitical modernity. The book opens with an examination of modernity’s impact on rural Mississippi in As I Lay Dying and three short stories: “Mules in the Yard,” “Shingles for the Lord,” and “Barn Burning.” In these works, the rural South of the early twentieth century may outwardly appear to be diametrically opposed to—and, indeed, fundamentally incapable of embracing—modernity. Watson argues, however, that these texts in fact demonstrate that families like the Bundrens and the Snopeses take an active role in modernization:

for a select group of Faulkner’s rural subjects, modernization isn’t something that the novelist, from his privileged regional vantage point, can see happening to them, [End Page 453] radiating outward from town and more distant centers of capitalist development, so much as something he watches them do, something they bring with them into the hamlets, towns, and cities they subsequently shock, energize, and estrange.

(44)

As such, the opening chapter of Faces of Modernity offer a riposte to any reader or scholar of Faulkner and southern fiction tempted to assert that passivity or resistance to the processes of modernization is a key theme which dominates these works, As I Lay Dying in particular. Such readings, Watson observes, disproportionately focus on modernity’s “impact on rural people [as] a form of victimization. . . . disempowerment, disorientation, [and] even disarticulation” (65). By challenging this well-entrenched characterization of modernity in Faulkner’s works as enforced upon rather than embraced by his rural denizens, Watson urges all future Faulkner scholars to reorient their perspective on the pastoral South as a whole and across time.

Watson then offers a fascinating materialist reading of Light in August that links Jefferson’s “material economy involving the industrial production and distribution of timber, lumber, and other wood products” (75) with the corporeal experiences of the novel’s central characters, specifically the ill-fated and marginalized Joe Christmas. Watson’s reading culminates in an ingenuous and haunting connection between the violence Joe experiences at the hands of a lynch mob led by the white supremacist Percy Grimm and the planing machine he utilizes during his brief stint at Doane’s Mill at the beginning of the novel. The savagery Grimm inflicts upon Joe strips him of his humanity, rendering him an inanimate, mechanical object by forcing him “through the planer, in a hideous ‘surfacing’ operation that exposes the brutal logic of small-town social norms” (81). While Watson does not explicitly link this moment to works such as Sister Carrie or Lady Chatterley’s Lover, his observation here could potentially provide fruitful new insights and comparisons of Faulkner’s work with Dreiser’s and Lawrence’s (to name only two of several possible authors), namely the ways in which modernist novels depict the dehumanization of mechanical modernity, beyond both the South and the borders of the United States itself.

Following on from the technologically-minded reading of Light in August, Watson offers fresh perspectives on the central role of the automobile and the airplane...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MISSISSIPPI QUARTERLY
MISSISSIPPI QUARTERLY Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1948, the Mississippi Quarterly is a refereed, scholarly journal dedicated to the life and culture of the American South, past and present. The journal is published quarterly by the College of Arts and Sciences of Mississippi State University.
期刊最新文献
Digitizing Faulkner: Yoknapatawpha in the Twenty-First Century ed. by Theresa M. Towner (review) Of Gaines and Genre: Plotting the Racial Borders in Southern Louisiana William Faulkner and Mortality: A Fine Dead Sound by Ahmed Honeini (review) The Falkners and the Methodist Church in Oxford, Mississippi "Even in a Place of Sorrow, Even in a Place of Joy": Intersections of Blackness and Southernness in the Works of bell hooks and Honorée Fanonne Jeffers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1