守卫的改变:1956-2010年美国电视节目的地位动态与创新

IF 2 2区 社会学 0 LITERATURE Poetics Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.poetic.2023.101859
Erez Aharon Marantz , Gino Cattani
{"title":"守卫的改变:1956-2010年美国电视节目的地位动态与创新","authors":"Erez Aharon Marantz ,&nbsp;Gino Cattani","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2023.101859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Researchers have advanced two opposing accounts of the relationship between status and cultural innovation. We aim to reconcile these views – and their conflicting findings that <em>either</em> high- <em>or</em> low-status cultural producers are more likely to innovate – by adopting a dynamic view of status. We argue that changes in status – at the individual and the field level – affect the relationship between status and innovation. Focusing on the national American television industry over the period 1956–2010, we found that increases and decreases in producers’ status moderated the effect of their current status on the innovativeness of their shows. We also found that the degree of instability in the overall status hierarchy of producers conditioned the impact of status on show innovativeness. When the status hierarchy was relatively stable, high-status producers tended to create more innovative shows than low-status producers. Greater levels of instability, however, decreased the show innovativeness of high-status producers but increased that of low-status producers. By exposing the pressures and opportunities that cultural producers experience as a result of changes in both their status and the status hierarchy, we reveal that the relationship between status and innovation is more nuanced than prior studies suggested.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47900,"journal":{"name":"Poetics","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 101859"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X23000992/pdfft?md5=1ed61441d5c16b34c29ad208c844fdca&pid=1-s2.0-S0304422X23000992-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing of the guards: Status dynamics and innovation in American TV shows, 1956–2010\",\"authors\":\"Erez Aharon Marantz ,&nbsp;Gino Cattani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.poetic.2023.101859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Researchers have advanced two opposing accounts of the relationship between status and cultural innovation. We aim to reconcile these views – and their conflicting findings that <em>either</em> high- <em>or</em> low-status cultural producers are more likely to innovate – by adopting a dynamic view of status. We argue that changes in status – at the individual and the field level – affect the relationship between status and innovation. Focusing on the national American television industry over the period 1956–2010, we found that increases and decreases in producers’ status moderated the effect of their current status on the innovativeness of their shows. We also found that the degree of instability in the overall status hierarchy of producers conditioned the impact of status on show innovativeness. When the status hierarchy was relatively stable, high-status producers tended to create more innovative shows than low-status producers. Greater levels of instability, however, decreased the show innovativeness of high-status producers but increased that of low-status producers. By exposing the pressures and opportunities that cultural producers experience as a result of changes in both their status and the status hierarchy, we reveal that the relationship between status and innovation is more nuanced than prior studies suggested.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poetics\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101859\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X23000992/pdfft?md5=1ed61441d5c16b34c29ad208c844fdca&pid=1-s2.0-S0304422X23000992-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X23000992\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poetics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X23000992","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员对地位与文化创新之间的关系提出了两种截然相反的说法。我们的目标是通过采用一种动态的地位观来调和这些观点——以及他们相互矛盾的发现,即地位高或地位低的文化生产者更有可能创新。我们认为,地位的变化——在个人和领域层面——影响着地位与创新之间的关系。以1956-2010年的美国电视行业为研究对象,我们发现制片人地位的上升和下降调节了他们当前地位对其节目创新性的影响。我们还发现,制作人整体地位等级的不稳定程度决定了地位对节目创新的影响。当地位等级相对稳定时,地位高的制作人往往比地位低的制作人创作出更多的创新节目。然而,更大程度的不稳定性降低了高地位生产者的创新能力,但增加了低地位生产者的创新能力。通过揭示文化生产者由于其地位和地位等级的变化而经历的压力和机会,我们揭示了地位与创新之间的关系比之前的研究所表明的更为微妙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changing of the guards: Status dynamics and innovation in American TV shows, 1956–2010

Researchers have advanced two opposing accounts of the relationship between status and cultural innovation. We aim to reconcile these views – and their conflicting findings that either high- or low-status cultural producers are more likely to innovate – by adopting a dynamic view of status. We argue that changes in status – at the individual and the field level – affect the relationship between status and innovation. Focusing on the national American television industry over the period 1956–2010, we found that increases and decreases in producers’ status moderated the effect of their current status on the innovativeness of their shows. We also found that the degree of instability in the overall status hierarchy of producers conditioned the impact of status on show innovativeness. When the status hierarchy was relatively stable, high-status producers tended to create more innovative shows than low-status producers. Greater levels of instability, however, decreased the show innovativeness of high-status producers but increased that of low-status producers. By exposing the pressures and opportunities that cultural producers experience as a result of changes in both their status and the status hierarchy, we reveal that the relationship between status and innovation is more nuanced than prior studies suggested.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Poetics
Poetics Multiple-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Poetics is an interdisciplinary journal of theoretical and empirical research on culture, the media and the arts. Particularly welcome are papers that make an original contribution to the major disciplines - sociology, psychology, media and communication studies, and economics - within which promising lines of research on culture, media and the arts have been developed.
期刊最新文献
Status and Subfield: The Distribution of Sociological Specializations across Departments Literary practices, capital structures and political position-taking: The Norwegian writers during World War II Making the collectivist organization: Creativity, conformity, and social closure Taste on Facebook: Revisiting the omnivore–univore hypothesis using digital trace data The dance of markets and movements: The emergence and development of dance genres in the US, UK, and the Netherlands, 1985–2005
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1