从理论到实践:关于如何有效衡量人权影响的思考

IF 0.9 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of Human Rights Practice Pub Date : 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1093/jhuman/huad050
Natalia Gubbioni, Danny Vannucchi
{"title":"从理论到实践:关于如何有效衡量人权影响的思考","authors":"Natalia Gubbioni, Danny Vannucchi","doi":"10.1093/jhuman/huad050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What are the biggest challenges and opportunities when an organization is trying to understand the human rights impact it has achieved? Building on more than 12 years combined years of practical evaluation and impact assessment experience across various organizations in the human rights field, the authors reflect on the key lessons learnt while trying to balance organizational needs of reporting, planning, and accountability with the substantive need of understanding how to break down human rights progress and how it happens. Reflections will be articulated in four key challenges, each with practical ideas to build on: the data challenge—what kind of information can give us the most meaningful view of human rights impact; the progress challenge—how we might capture the incremental nature and gradual pace of human rights impact; the target challenge—how best to balance the need to work towards realistic targets with setting an ambitious agenda for change; and finally, the context challenge—how we might compare human rights impact across countries and acknowledge different operating contexts.","PeriodicalId":45407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Rights Practice","volume":"44 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Theory to Practice: Reflections on how we can Meaningfully Measure Human Rights Impact\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Gubbioni, Danny Vannucchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jhuman/huad050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What are the biggest challenges and opportunities when an organization is trying to understand the human rights impact it has achieved? Building on more than 12 years combined years of practical evaluation and impact assessment experience across various organizations in the human rights field, the authors reflect on the key lessons learnt while trying to balance organizational needs of reporting, planning, and accountability with the substantive need of understanding how to break down human rights progress and how it happens. Reflections will be articulated in four key challenges, each with practical ideas to build on: the data challenge—what kind of information can give us the most meaningful view of human rights impact; the progress challenge—how we might capture the incremental nature and gradual pace of human rights impact; the target challenge—how best to balance the need to work towards realistic targets with setting an ambitious agenda for change; and finally, the context challenge—how we might compare human rights impact across countries and acknowledge different operating contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Rights Practice\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Rights Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huad050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Rights Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huad050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当一个组织试图了解它所取得的人权影响时,最大的挑战和机遇是什么?在人权领域各组织超过12年的实际评估和影响评估经验的基础上,作者在试图平衡组织对报告、规划和问责的需求与理解如何分解人权进展及其发生方式的实质性需求的同时,反思了所吸取的关键教训。将在四个关键挑战中阐述反思,每个挑战都有实际的想法作为基础:数据挑战——什么样的信息可以让我们对人权影响有最有意义的看法;进步的挑战——我们如何把握人权影响的渐进式和渐进式;目标挑战——如何最好地平衡实现现实目标的需要与制定雄心勃勃的变革议程之间的关系;最后,背景挑战——我们如何比较各国对人权的影响,并承认不同的运作背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Theory to Practice: Reflections on how we can Meaningfully Measure Human Rights Impact
What are the biggest challenges and opportunities when an organization is trying to understand the human rights impact it has achieved? Building on more than 12 years combined years of practical evaluation and impact assessment experience across various organizations in the human rights field, the authors reflect on the key lessons learnt while trying to balance organizational needs of reporting, planning, and accountability with the substantive need of understanding how to break down human rights progress and how it happens. Reflections will be articulated in four key challenges, each with practical ideas to build on: the data challenge—what kind of information can give us the most meaningful view of human rights impact; the progress challenge—how we might capture the incremental nature and gradual pace of human rights impact; the target challenge—how best to balance the need to work towards realistic targets with setting an ambitious agenda for change; and finally, the context challenge—how we might compare human rights impact across countries and acknowledge different operating contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
80
期刊最新文献
Administrative Lawfare at the European Union’s External Borders: Some Perspectives on Administrative Regulation of NGO Search and Rescue Activities in Italy and the Situation at the Polish-Belarusian Border Specificity in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights A Jurisdictional Vertigo: Compulsory Arbitration, Sports and the European Court of Human Rights Forced Marriages in Times of Armed Conflict: An Implicit Paradox of Modern Slavery under International Humanitarian Law The Politics of Ambiguous Loss: Missing Persons and Social Ecologies after Armed Conflict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1