食品券和饮食多样性:来自印度尼西亚社会保障改革的证据

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Security Pub Date : 2023-11-28 DOI:10.1007/s12571-023-01413-0
Anu Rammohan, Achmad Tohari
{"title":"食品券和饮食多样性:来自印度尼西亚社会保障改革的证据","authors":"Anu Rammohan, Achmad Tohari","doi":"10.1007/s12571-023-01413-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In-kind food transfers are widely used in many developing countries to address food insecurity, yet undernutrition remains a key problem. In this paper, we combine nationally representative administrative and household survey data from Indonesia, to evaluate whether the replacement of means-tested in-kind food transfers (<i>Rastra</i> program which delivered staple cereal rice) by a food voucher system (<i>BPNT</i> program) changed the consumption behaviour of the poor. Our analyses show that the BPNT program increased dietary diversity among poor households, by at least 15 percentage points relative to those households that still received in-kind food transfers. Further, the new initiative has also improved the consumption of essential nutrients by poor households and the targeting performance of social welfare programs. Our results highlight the importance of social protection reform and show that changing such in-kind programs to vouchers provide poor households with greater flexibility to choose the foods of their choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":567,"journal":{"name":"Food Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food vouchers and dietary diversity: evidence from social protection reform in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Anu Rammohan, Achmad Tohari\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12571-023-01413-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In-kind food transfers are widely used in many developing countries to address food insecurity, yet undernutrition remains a key problem. In this paper, we combine nationally representative administrative and household survey data from Indonesia, to evaluate whether the replacement of means-tested in-kind food transfers (<i>Rastra</i> program which delivered staple cereal rice) by a food voucher system (<i>BPNT</i> program) changed the consumption behaviour of the poor. Our analyses show that the BPNT program increased dietary diversity among poor households, by at least 15 percentage points relative to those households that still received in-kind food transfers. Further, the new initiative has also improved the consumption of essential nutrients by poor households and the targeting performance of social welfare programs. Our results highlight the importance of social protection reform and show that changing such in-kind programs to vouchers provide poor households with greater flexibility to choose the foods of their choice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Security\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-023-01413-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-023-01413-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实物粮食转移在许多发展中国家广泛用于解决粮食不安全问题,但营养不良仍然是一个关键问题。在本文中,我们结合了来自印度尼西亚的具有全国代表性的行政和家庭调查数据,以评估食品券系统(BPNT计划)是否改变了穷人的消费行为,而不是经济状况调查的实物食品转移(提供主食谷物大米的Rastra计划)。我们的分析表明,BPNT计划增加了贫困家庭的饮食多样性,相对于那些仍然接受实物粮食转移的家庭,至少增加了15个百分点。此外,新举措还改善了贫困家庭对基本营养素的消费,提高了社会福利项目的目标绩效。我们的研究结果强调了社会保障改革的重要性,并表明将这种实物计划改为代金券为贫困家庭提供了更大的灵活性来选择他们所选择的食物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Food vouchers and dietary diversity: evidence from social protection reform in Indonesia

In-kind food transfers are widely used in many developing countries to address food insecurity, yet undernutrition remains a key problem. In this paper, we combine nationally representative administrative and household survey data from Indonesia, to evaluate whether the replacement of means-tested in-kind food transfers (Rastra program which delivered staple cereal rice) by a food voucher system (BPNT program) changed the consumption behaviour of the poor. Our analyses show that the BPNT program increased dietary diversity among poor households, by at least 15 percentage points relative to those households that still received in-kind food transfers. Further, the new initiative has also improved the consumption of essential nutrients by poor households and the targeting performance of social welfare programs. Our results highlight the importance of social protection reform and show that changing such in-kind programs to vouchers provide poor households with greater flexibility to choose the foods of their choice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Security
Food Security FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
6.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Food Security is a wide audience, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to the procurement, access (economic and physical), and quality of food, in all its dimensions. Scales range from the individual to communities, and to the world food system. We strive to publish high-quality scientific articles, where quality includes, but is not limited to, the quality and clarity of text, and the validity of methods and approaches. Food Security is the initiative of a distinguished international group of scientists from different disciplines who hold a deep concern for the challenge of global food security, together with a vision of the power of shared knowledge as a means of meeting that challenge. To address the challenge of global food security, the journal seeks to address the constraints - physical, biological and socio-economic - which not only limit food production but also the ability of people to access a healthy diet. From this perspective, the journal covers the following areas: Global food needs: the mismatch between population and the ability to provide adequate nutrition Global food potential and global food production Natural constraints to satisfying global food needs: § Climate, climate variability, and climate change § Desertification and flooding § Natural disasters § Soils, soil quality and threats to soils, edaphic and other abiotic constraints to production § Biotic constraints to production, pathogens, pests, and weeds in their effects on sustainable production The sociological contexts of food production, access, quality, and consumption. Nutrition, food quality and food safety. Socio-political factors that impinge on the ability to satisfy global food needs: § Land, agricultural and food policy § International relations and trade § Access to food § Financial policy § Wars and ethnic unrest Research policies and priorities to ensure food security in its various dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Food security effects of forest sector participation in rural Liberia The impact of forage condition on household food security in northern Kenya and southern Ethiopia A new framework on climate-induced food-security risk for small-scale fishing communities in Tanzania Changes and correlates of household food insecurity during COVID-19: a repeated cross-sectional survey of low-income households in peri-urban Peru Examining the determinants of food waste behavior in China at the consumer level
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1