估计婴儿麻疹疫苗接种的最佳年龄

Elizabeth Goult, Laura Andrea Barrero Guevara, Michael Briga, Matthieu Domenech de Cellès
{"title":"估计婴儿麻疹疫苗接种的最佳年龄","authors":"Elizabeth Goult, Laura Andrea Barrero Guevara, Michael Briga, Matthieu Domenech de Cellès","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.20.23298759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The persistence of measles in many regions demonstrates large immunity gaps, resulting from incomplete or ineffective immunization with measles-containing vaccines (MCVs). A key factor affecting MCV impact is age, with infants receiving dose 1 (MCV1) at older ages having a reduced risk of vaccine failure, but also an increased risk of contracting infection before vaccination. Here, we designed a new method—based on a transmission model incorporating realistic vaccination delays and age variations in MCV1 effectiveness—to capture this risk trade-off and estimate the optimal age for recommending MCV1. We predict a large heterogeneity in the optimal ages (range: 6–20 months), contrasting the homogeneity of observed recommendations worldwide. Furthermore, we show that the optimal age depends on the local epidemiology of measles, with a lower optimal age predicted in populations suffering higher transmission. Overall, our results suggest the scope for public health authorities to tailor the recommended schedule for better measles control.","PeriodicalId":501386,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Policy","volume":"36 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating the optimal age for infant measles vaccination\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Goult, Laura Andrea Barrero Guevara, Michael Briga, Matthieu Domenech de Cellès\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2023.11.20.23298759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The persistence of measles in many regions demonstrates large immunity gaps, resulting from incomplete or ineffective immunization with measles-containing vaccines (MCVs). A key factor affecting MCV impact is age, with infants receiving dose 1 (MCV1) at older ages having a reduced risk of vaccine failure, but also an increased risk of contracting infection before vaccination. Here, we designed a new method—based on a transmission model incorporating realistic vaccination delays and age variations in MCV1 effectiveness—to capture this risk trade-off and estimate the optimal age for recommending MCV1. We predict a large heterogeneity in the optimal ages (range: 6–20 months), contrasting the homogeneity of observed recommendations worldwide. Furthermore, we show that the optimal age depends on the local epidemiology of measles, with a lower optimal age predicted in populations suffering higher transmission. Overall, our results suggest the scope for public health authorities to tailor the recommended schedule for better measles control.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"36 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.20.23298759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.20.23298759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

麻疹在许多地区的持续存在表明存在巨大的免疫缺口,这是由于含麻疹疫苗免疫接种不完整或无效造成的。影响MCV效果的一个关键因素是年龄,年龄较大的婴儿接种1剂(MCV1)疫苗失败的风险降低,但在接种疫苗前感染的风险也增加。在这里,我们设计了一种基于传播模型的新方法,该模型结合了实际的疫苗接种延迟和MCV1有效性的年龄变化,以捕捉这种风险权衡并估计推荐MCV1的最佳年龄。我们预测最佳年龄(范围:6-20个月)存在很大的异质性,与世界范围内观察到的建议的同质性形成对比。此外,我们表明,最佳年龄取决于当地的麻疹流行病学,在传播率较高的人群中,预测的最佳年龄较低。总的来说,我们的结果表明,公共卫生当局有余地调整推荐的时间表,以更好地控制麻疹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating the optimal age for infant measles vaccination
The persistence of measles in many regions demonstrates large immunity gaps, resulting from incomplete or ineffective immunization with measles-containing vaccines (MCVs). A key factor affecting MCV impact is age, with infants receiving dose 1 (MCV1) at older ages having a reduced risk of vaccine failure, but also an increased risk of contracting infection before vaccination. Here, we designed a new method—based on a transmission model incorporating realistic vaccination delays and age variations in MCV1 effectiveness—to capture this risk trade-off and estimate the optimal age for recommending MCV1. We predict a large heterogeneity in the optimal ages (range: 6–20 months), contrasting the homogeneity of observed recommendations worldwide. Furthermore, we show that the optimal age depends on the local epidemiology of measles, with a lower optimal age predicted in populations suffering higher transmission. Overall, our results suggest the scope for public health authorities to tailor the recommended schedule for better measles control.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"WE CAN ALL CONTRIBUTE IN OUR OWN WAY" : KNOWLEDGE MOBILIZATION TOOLS TO PROMOTE BEST PRACTICES IN UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBILITY Geospatial Analysis of the Association between Medicaid Ex-pansion, Minimum Wage Policies, and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia Prevalence in the United States The clinical and cost-effectiveness of interventions for preventing continence issues resulting from birth trauma: a rapid review Supporting women, girls and people who menstruate to participate in physical activity - Rapid evidence summary Performance of the Washington Group Questions in Measuring Blindness and Deafness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1