促进知识生态系统中可持续创新的元治理形式

IF 4.8 Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Business Ethics-A European Review Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1111/beer.12635
Simona Fiandrino, Melchior Gromis di Trana, Alberto Tonelli, Fabio Rizzato
{"title":"促进知识生态系统中可持续创新的元治理形式","authors":"Simona Fiandrino, Melchior Gromis di Trana, Alberto Tonelli, Fabio Rizzato","doi":"10.1111/beer.12635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores how different actors operating in a knowledge ecosystem catalyse sustainability‐oriented innovation. Through collaborative practices among actors, knowledge ecosystems constitute a fertile ground for sustainability‐oriented innovation to grow and flourish by creating value for businesses and society. The current literature on knowledge ecosystems is lacking in outlining governing mechanisms to foster collaborative practices aimed at advocating open innovation for sustainability transition. This study aims to close this literature gap. Through interview data collected in a knowledge ecosystem, we apply precepts of grounded theory to reveal four forms of metagovernance—network design, network framing, network management and network participation. This study proposes a conceptual framework of metagovernance forms as powering layers to foster sustainability‐oriented innovation in a knowledge ecosystem. We further discuss potential weaknesses that may jeopardise the development of sustainability‐oriented innovation in the knowledge ecosystem. This study contributes to the literature on sustainability‐oriented innovation by acknowledging metagovernance as the appropriate governing mechanism that balances the activities and processes of sustainability‐oriented innovations for becoming and being sustainable.","PeriodicalId":47954,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics-A European Review","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metagovernance forms for enhancing sustainability-oriented innovation in a knowledge ecosystem\",\"authors\":\"Simona Fiandrino, Melchior Gromis di Trana, Alberto Tonelli, Fabio Rizzato\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/beer.12635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explores how different actors operating in a knowledge ecosystem catalyse sustainability‐oriented innovation. Through collaborative practices among actors, knowledge ecosystems constitute a fertile ground for sustainability‐oriented innovation to grow and flourish by creating value for businesses and society. The current literature on knowledge ecosystems is lacking in outlining governing mechanisms to foster collaborative practices aimed at advocating open innovation for sustainability transition. This study aims to close this literature gap. Through interview data collected in a knowledge ecosystem, we apply precepts of grounded theory to reveal four forms of metagovernance—network design, network framing, network management and network participation. This study proposes a conceptual framework of metagovernance forms as powering layers to foster sustainability‐oriented innovation in a knowledge ecosystem. We further discuss potential weaknesses that may jeopardise the development of sustainability‐oriented innovation in the knowledge ecosystem. This study contributes to the literature on sustainability‐oriented innovation by acknowledging metagovernance as the appropriate governing mechanism that balances the activities and processes of sustainability‐oriented innovations for becoming and being sustainable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Ethics-A European Review\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Ethics-A European Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12635\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics-A European Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了知识生态系统中不同行动者如何促进可持续创新。通过行动者之间的协作实践,知识生态系统为面向可持续发展的创新提供了肥沃的土壤,通过为企业和社会创造价值,促进创新的发展和繁荣。目前关于知识生态系统的文献缺乏概述治理机制,以促进旨在倡导可持续性转型的开放式创新的协作实践。本研究旨在弥补这一文献空白。通过在知识生态系统中收集的访谈数据,我们运用扎根理论的原则揭示了四种形式的元治理——网络设计、网络框架、网络管理和网络参与。本研究提出了一个概念框架,将元治理形式作为动力层,促进知识生态系统中以可持续为导向的创新。我们进一步讨论了可能危及知识生态系统中以可持续为导向的创新发展的潜在弱点。本研究通过承认元治理是一种适当的治理机制,可以平衡可持续导向创新的活动和过程,从而成为可持续的,从而为可持续导向创新的文献做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Metagovernance forms for enhancing sustainability-oriented innovation in a knowledge ecosystem
This study explores how different actors operating in a knowledge ecosystem catalyse sustainability‐oriented innovation. Through collaborative practices among actors, knowledge ecosystems constitute a fertile ground for sustainability‐oriented innovation to grow and flourish by creating value for businesses and society. The current literature on knowledge ecosystems is lacking in outlining governing mechanisms to foster collaborative practices aimed at advocating open innovation for sustainability transition. This study aims to close this literature gap. Through interview data collected in a knowledge ecosystem, we apply precepts of grounded theory to reveal four forms of metagovernance—network design, network framing, network management and network participation. This study proposes a conceptual framework of metagovernance forms as powering layers to foster sustainability‐oriented innovation in a knowledge ecosystem. We further discuss potential weaknesses that may jeopardise the development of sustainability‐oriented innovation in the knowledge ecosystem. This study contributes to the literature on sustainability‐oriented innovation by acknowledging metagovernance as the appropriate governing mechanism that balances the activities and processes of sustainability‐oriented innovations for becoming and being sustainable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: -To offer rigorous and informed analysis of ethical issues and perspectives relevant to organizations and their relationships with society -To promote scholarly research and advance knowledge in relation to business ethics and corporate social responsibility and social entrepreneurship by providing cutting edge theoretical and empirical analysis of salient issues and developments -To be responsive to changing concerns and emerging issues in the business ethics and business and society sphere, and to seek to reflect these in the balance of contributions -To be the publication outlet of choice for all types of original research relating to business ethics and business-society relationships. Original articles are welcomed. Each issue will normally contain several major articles, and there will be an occasional FOCUS section which will contain articles on an issue of particular importance and topicality. Other regular features will include editorial interviews, book reviews, comments and responses to published articles, research notes and case studies. Business Ethics: A European Review is well established as an academic research journal which is at the same time readable, user-friendly and authoritative. It publishes both fully refereed scholarly papers and special contributions such as speeches and reviews. The range of contributions reflects the variety and scope of ethical issues faced by business and other organisations world-wide, and at the same time seeks to address the interests and concerns of the journals readership.
期刊最新文献
Does voluntary environmental, social, and governance disclosure impact initial public offer withdrawal risk? Communicating CSR relationships in COVID-19: The evolution of cross-sector communication networks on social media How can sustainable business models distribute value more equitably in global value chains? Introducing “value chain profit sharing” as an emerging alternative to fair trade, direct trade, or solidarity trade An examination of the 2012–2022 empirical ethical decision-making literature: A quinary review The consequences of dishonesty—A mediation-moderation praxis of greenwashing, tourists' green trust, and word-of-mouth: The role of connectedness to nature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1