候选人受欢迎程度信息对规避损失选民弃权的影响

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS Economic Theory Bulletin Pub Date : 2022-01-11 DOI:10.1007/s40505-021-00214-y
Kohei Daido, Tomoya Tajika
{"title":"候选人受欢迎程度信息对规避损失选民弃权的影响","authors":"Kohei Daido, Tomoya Tajika","doi":"10.1007/s40505-021-00214-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we build a two-candidate election model, in which voters are loss averse and face uncertainty about whether their preferred candidate is supported by a majority. Even without costs for voting, abstention may occur when voters have expectations-based reference-dependent preferences, as in Kőszegi and Rabin (Q J Econ 121:1133–1165, 2006; Am Econ Rev 97:1047–1073, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.4.1047, 2007). We show that loss aversion leads to the equilibrium wherein abstention occurs in a large election, and the abstention rate of voters who prefer the minority candidate is higher than that of voters who prefer the majority candidate.</p>","PeriodicalId":40852,"journal":{"name":"Economic Theory Bulletin","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Information Concerning the Popularity of Candidates on Loss-Averse Voters’ Abstention\",\"authors\":\"Kohei Daido, Tomoya Tajika\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40505-021-00214-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this study, we build a two-candidate election model, in which voters are loss averse and face uncertainty about whether their preferred candidate is supported by a majority. Even without costs for voting, abstention may occur when voters have expectations-based reference-dependent preferences, as in Kőszegi and Rabin (Q J Econ 121:1133–1165, 2006; Am Econ Rev 97:1047–1073, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.4.1047, 2007). We show that loss aversion leads to the equilibrium wherein abstention occurs in a large election, and the abstention rate of voters who prefer the minority candidate is higher than that of voters who prefer the majority candidate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Theory Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Theory Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-021-00214-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Theory Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-021-00214-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本研究中,我们建立了一个双候选人选举模型,在这个模型中,选民是损失厌恶的,并且面临着他们喜欢的候选人是否得到大多数人支持的不确定性。即使没有投票成本,当选民有基于预期的参考依赖偏好时,弃权也可能发生,如Kőszegi和Rabin (Q J Econ 121:1133-1165, 2006;Am economics Rev 97:1047-1073, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.4.1047, 2007)。我们证明了损失厌恶导致在大型选举中出现弃权的均衡,并且倾向于少数候选人的选民的弃权率高于倾向于多数候选人的选民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Information Concerning the Popularity of Candidates on Loss-Averse Voters’ Abstention

In this study, we build a two-candidate election model, in which voters are loss averse and face uncertainty about whether their preferred candidate is supported by a majority. Even without costs for voting, abstention may occur when voters have expectations-based reference-dependent preferences, as in Kőszegi and Rabin (Q J Econ 121:1133–1165, 2006; Am Econ Rev 97:1047–1073, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.4.1047, 2007). We show that loss aversion leads to the equilibrium wherein abstention occurs in a large election, and the abstention rate of voters who prefer the minority candidate is higher than that of voters who prefer the majority candidate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The purpose of Economic Theory Bulletin is to provide an outlet for research in all areas of Economics based on rigorous theoretical reasoning. The Economic Theory Bulletin together with Economic Theory are the official journals of the Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory. The Economic Theory Bulletin is intended to publish: 1. Short papers/notes of substantial interest. Content is subject to the same standards as Economic Theory: research in all areas of economics based on rigorous theoretical reasoning and on topics in mathematics that are supported by the analysis of economic problems. Published articles contribute to the understanding and solution of substantive economic problems. Theory papers with the substance and style for other journals that specialize in short papers are welcomed. Corollaries of already known results in the literature are not appropriate for publication. 2. Survey papers that clearly picture the basic ideas at work in the area, the essential technical apparatus that is used and the central questions that remain open.
期刊最新文献
Divisionalization and symmetric product differentiation The existence of Walrasian equilibrium: infinitely many commodities, measure space of agents, and discontinuous preferences Imperfect discrimination, similarity, and stochastic transitivity A solution to a conjecture of David Schmeidler Endowments, patience types, and uniqueness in two-good HARA utility economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1