美国的性少数群体、宗教和自评健康

IF 2.3 1区 哲学 0 RELIGION Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion Pub Date : 2023-11-15 DOI:10.1111/jssr.12884
Stephen Cranney
{"title":"美国的性少数群体、宗教和自评健康","authors":"Stephen Cranney","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While religiosity has generally been found to be associated with health, sexual minority individuals are a theoretically unique population in the literature. Because of sample size issues, the extent to which sexual minority individuals differ from nonsexual minority individuals in the health and religion relationship has been difficult to comprehensively test; additionally, the theoretically germane but often hypothesized distinction between affirming and nonaffirming religions has remained largely untested. This study draws on the Cooperative Election Study, a nationally representative survey with a relatively large sexual minority sample (∼6600), and finds that (1) sexual minority individuals are less likely to affiliate with a religion; (2) sexual minority individuals report poorer health; (3) sexual minority individuals do enjoy an overall health benefit from religiosity, but this benefit is attenuated (compared to nonsexual minority individuals) in the case of affiliation; and (4) there is some ambiguous evidence for an affirming religiosity effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":51390,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","volume":"63 2","pages":"240-264"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexual Minorities, Religion, and Self-Rated Health in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Cranney\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jssr.12884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While religiosity has generally been found to be associated with health, sexual minority individuals are a theoretically unique population in the literature. Because of sample size issues, the extent to which sexual minority individuals differ from nonsexual minority individuals in the health and religion relationship has been difficult to comprehensively test; additionally, the theoretically germane but often hypothesized distinction between affirming and nonaffirming religions has remained largely untested. This study draws on the Cooperative Election Study, a nationally representative survey with a relatively large sexual minority sample (∼6600), and finds that (1) sexual minority individuals are less likely to affiliate with a religion; (2) sexual minority individuals report poorer health; (3) sexual minority individuals do enjoy an overall health benefit from religiosity, but this benefit is attenuated (compared to nonsexual minority individuals) in the case of affiliation; and (4) there is some ambiguous evidence for an affirming religiosity effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion\",\"volume\":\"63 2\",\"pages\":\"240-264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jssr.12884\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jssr.12884","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然宗教信仰通常被发现与健康有关,但在文献中,性少数群体在理论上是一个独特的群体。由于样本量的问题,性少数群体与非性少数群体在健康与宗教关系上的差异程度难以全面检验;此外,肯定宗教和非肯定宗教之间的区别在理论上是密切相关的,但通常是假设的,这在很大程度上仍未经检验。这项研究借鉴了合作选举研究,这是一项具有全国代表性的调查,其中有相对较大的性少数群体样本(~ 6600),并发现:(1)性少数群体不太可能与宗教联系在一起;(2)性少数人群健康状况较差;(3)性少数群体确实从宗教信仰中获得了总体的健康益处,但在隶属关系的情况下,这种益处(与非性少数群体相比)减弱了;(4)有一些模棱两可的证据可以肯定宗教信仰效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sexual Minorities, Religion, and Self-Rated Health in the United States

While religiosity has generally been found to be associated with health, sexual minority individuals are a theoretically unique population in the literature. Because of sample size issues, the extent to which sexual minority individuals differ from nonsexual minority individuals in the health and religion relationship has been difficult to comprehensively test; additionally, the theoretically germane but often hypothesized distinction between affirming and nonaffirming religions has remained largely untested. This study draws on the Cooperative Election Study, a nationally representative survey with a relatively large sexual minority sample (∼6600), and finds that (1) sexual minority individuals are less likely to affiliate with a religion; (2) sexual minority individuals report poorer health; (3) sexual minority individuals do enjoy an overall health benefit from religiosity, but this benefit is attenuated (compared to nonsexual minority individuals) in the case of affiliation; and (4) there is some ambiguous evidence for an affirming religiosity effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion is a multi-disciplinary journal that publishes articles, research notes, and book reviews on the social scientific study of religion. Published articles are representative of the best current theoretical and methodological treatments of religion. Substantive areas include both micro-level analysis of religious organizations, institutions, and social change. While many articles published in the journal are sociological, the journal also publishes the work of psychologists, political scientists, anthropologists, and economists.
期刊最新文献
Will Americans Vote for an Atheist? Issue Information Christian Nationalism and Violence Against Religious Minorities in the United States: A Quantitative Analysis Multidimensional Latent Religiosity Profiles and Sexual Behaviors in Late Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood RACE AND THE POWER OF SERMONS ON AMERICAN POLITICS. By R.Khari Brown, Ronald E.Brown, and James S.Jackson. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2021. xii + 167 pp. $70.00 hardcover, $54.95 ebook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1