单纯椎板切除术与椎板切除术联合侧块螺钉固定治疗多节段颈椎管狭窄的比较分析

IF 0.7 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Egyptian journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2023-11-23 DOI:10.1186/s41984-023-00260-7
Hany Elkholy, Mohamed Ahmed El Tabl, Osama Saber El Sherif
{"title":"单纯椎板切除术与椎板切除术联合侧块螺钉固定治疗多节段颈椎管狭窄的比较分析","authors":"Hany Elkholy, Mohamed Ahmed El Tabl, Osama Saber El Sherif","doi":"10.1186/s41984-023-00260-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multisegment cervical canal stenosis is one of the most common causes of spinal cord dysfunction. Cervical laminectomy affords direct relief from dorsal stenosis, but many concerns were raised regarding its effect on spinal stability and cervical sagittal alignment. Laminectomy in conjunction with lateral mass screws is aiming to prevent recurrence of stenosis and to achieve much improvement of the cervical spine range of motion and curvature. To compare the clinical and radiological outcome of laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation in the treatment of patients with multisegment cervical canal stenosis. A retrospective study conducted on 46 patients with multisegment cervical canal stenosis who were treated between April 2018 and April 2021. Patients were divided into two groups. The 20 cases in group (A) underwent conventional laminectomies and the 26 cases in group (B) underwent laminectomies with lateral mass screw fixation. Operative complications, visual analogue scale (VAS), neurological functional recovery and cervical curvature changes were compared between the two groups. Operative times in group A were significantly less than it was in group B (P < 0.001). The postoperative VAS scores in group B were significantly lower than those in group A (P < 0.05). No statistical differences in the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score could be found between the two groups after surgery. Patients in group B in comparison with those in group A had good alignment of the cervical spine with maintenance of curvature index (P < 0.001). In multilevel cervical canal stenosis, internal fixation using lateral mass screws in conjunction with laminectomy can be of a considerable significance than laminectomy alone in improving the axial symptoms and ceasing further disease progression through stabilization of the cervical spine and maintaining the sagittal alignment.","PeriodicalId":72881,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian journal of neurosurgery","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation in the treatment of multisegment cervical spinal canal stenosis: a comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Hany Elkholy, Mohamed Ahmed El Tabl, Osama Saber El Sherif\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41984-023-00260-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multisegment cervical canal stenosis is one of the most common causes of spinal cord dysfunction. Cervical laminectomy affords direct relief from dorsal stenosis, but many concerns were raised regarding its effect on spinal stability and cervical sagittal alignment. Laminectomy in conjunction with lateral mass screws is aiming to prevent recurrence of stenosis and to achieve much improvement of the cervical spine range of motion and curvature. To compare the clinical and radiological outcome of laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation in the treatment of patients with multisegment cervical canal stenosis. A retrospective study conducted on 46 patients with multisegment cervical canal stenosis who were treated between April 2018 and April 2021. Patients were divided into two groups. The 20 cases in group (A) underwent conventional laminectomies and the 26 cases in group (B) underwent laminectomies with lateral mass screw fixation. Operative complications, visual analogue scale (VAS), neurological functional recovery and cervical curvature changes were compared between the two groups. Operative times in group A were significantly less than it was in group B (P < 0.001). The postoperative VAS scores in group B were significantly lower than those in group A (P < 0.05). No statistical differences in the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score could be found between the two groups after surgery. Patients in group B in comparison with those in group A had good alignment of the cervical spine with maintenance of curvature index (P < 0.001). In multilevel cervical canal stenosis, internal fixation using lateral mass screws in conjunction with laminectomy can be of a considerable significance than laminectomy alone in improving the axial symptoms and ceasing further disease progression through stabilization of the cervical spine and maintaining the sagittal alignment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-023-00260-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-023-00260-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多节段颈椎管狭窄是脊髓功能障碍最常见的原因之一。颈椎椎板切除术可以直接缓解背侧狭窄,但许多人担心其对脊柱稳定性和颈椎矢状位的影响。椎板切除术联合侧块螺钉的目的是防止狭窄复发,并大大改善颈椎的活动范围和弯曲度。比较单纯椎板切除术与椎板切除术联合侧块螺钉固定治疗多节段颈椎管狭窄的临床和影像学结果。回顾性研究2018年4月至2021年4月期间收治的46例多节段颈椎管狭窄患者。患者分为两组。A组20例行常规椎板切除术,B组26例行侧块螺钉固定椎板切除术。比较两组手术并发症、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、神经功能恢复情况及颈椎曲度变化。A组手术次数明显少于B组(P < 0.001)。B组术后VAS评分显著低于A组(P < 0.05)。两组术后改良日本骨科协会评分差异无统计学意义。与A组患者相比,B组患者颈椎排列良好,曲率指数维持正常(P < 0.001)。在多节段颈椎管狭窄患者中,侧块螺钉内固定联合椎板切除术比单独椎板切除术在改善轴向症状和通过稳定颈椎和维持矢状位来阻止疾病进一步进展方面具有更大的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation in the treatment of multisegment cervical spinal canal stenosis: a comparative analysis
Multisegment cervical canal stenosis is one of the most common causes of spinal cord dysfunction. Cervical laminectomy affords direct relief from dorsal stenosis, but many concerns were raised regarding its effect on spinal stability and cervical sagittal alignment. Laminectomy in conjunction with lateral mass screws is aiming to prevent recurrence of stenosis and to achieve much improvement of the cervical spine range of motion and curvature. To compare the clinical and radiological outcome of laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation in the treatment of patients with multisegment cervical canal stenosis. A retrospective study conducted on 46 patients with multisegment cervical canal stenosis who were treated between April 2018 and April 2021. Patients were divided into two groups. The 20 cases in group (A) underwent conventional laminectomies and the 26 cases in group (B) underwent laminectomies with lateral mass screw fixation. Operative complications, visual analogue scale (VAS), neurological functional recovery and cervical curvature changes were compared between the two groups. Operative times in group A were significantly less than it was in group B (P < 0.001). The postoperative VAS scores in group B were significantly lower than those in group A (P < 0.05). No statistical differences in the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score could be found between the two groups after surgery. Patients in group B in comparison with those in group A had good alignment of the cervical spine with maintenance of curvature index (P < 0.001). In multilevel cervical canal stenosis, internal fixation using lateral mass screws in conjunction with laminectomy can be of a considerable significance than laminectomy alone in improving the axial symptoms and ceasing further disease progression through stabilization of the cervical spine and maintaining the sagittal alignment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Multidisciplinary team approach in management of anterior spinal dysraphism with unusual presentation: case series and surgical approach Analysis of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury associated with skull base fracture: a local tertiary center experience Conventional and old endovascular techniques for vertebral aneurysms still work in the era of flow diversion Possible effects of lumbar stabilization surgery on sagittal alignment, disability and quality of life Role of intraoperative cranial ultrasonography in detection of residual brain lesions during surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1