去掉安全套,也就去掉了 "同意":为什么美国应采纳澳大利亚的倡议,将偷情定为刑事犯罪?

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Family Court Review Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1111/fcre.12774
Gianna Amore
{"title":"去掉安全套,也就去掉了 \"同意\":为什么美国应采纳澳大利亚的倡议,将偷情定为刑事犯罪?","authors":"Gianna Amore","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stealthing, or non-consensual condom removal, has become a dark reality for many people, posing risks such as unwanted pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and negative mental health effects. Although stealthing has received prior media coverage, it continues to fly under the legal radar in all but one U.S. jurisdiction. With blogs listing their top 10 tips on stealthing, and memes making light of the issue, it is imperative that the U.S. take action to criminalize stealthing. While the rest of the world amends their laws to include stealthing, the U.S. remains one step behind.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"62 1","pages":"212-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remove the condom and you remove consent: Why the U.S. should adopt Australia's initiative as a guide to criminalize stealthing\",\"authors\":\"Gianna Amore\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fcre.12774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Stealthing, or non-consensual condom removal, has become a dark reality for many people, posing risks such as unwanted pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and negative mental health effects. Although stealthing has received prior media coverage, it continues to fly under the legal radar in all but one U.S. jurisdiction. With blogs listing their top 10 tips on stealthing, and memes making light of the issue, it is imperative that the U.S. take action to criminalize stealthing. While the rest of the world amends their laws to include stealthing, the U.S. remains one step behind.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Court Review\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"212-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Court Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

隐身,或未经同意摘除安全套,已成为许多人的黑暗现实,带来意外怀孕、性传播疾病和负面心理健康影响等风险。虽然隐性性行为之前曾被媒体报道过,但在美国除一个司法管辖区外,其他所有司法管辖区仍未将其纳入法律视野。有博客列出了隐身的十大技巧,也有备忘录对这一问题轻描淡写,因此美国必须采取行动,将隐身定为犯罪。当世界其他国家修改法律将隐身纳入其中时,美国仍然落后一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Remove the condom and you remove consent: Why the U.S. should adopt Australia's initiative as a guide to criminalize stealthing

Stealthing, or non-consensual condom removal, has become a dark reality for many people, posing risks such as unwanted pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and negative mental health effects. Although stealthing has received prior media coverage, it continues to fly under the legal radar in all but one U.S. jurisdiction. With blogs listing their top 10 tips on stealthing, and memes making light of the issue, it is imperative that the U.S. take action to criminalize stealthing. While the rest of the world amends their laws to include stealthing, the U.S. remains one step behind.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A call to action: Every family deserves active efforts. Keeping the black family together-active efforts as the standard for all removal and reunification efforts Cheating the evidence to get to best interest and the presumption of unfitness Lies my child welfare system has told me: The critical importance of centering families' voices in family policing legal advocacy Unbundling marriage law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1