对英国表面上的少数股东保护机制的制度分析

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q1 LAW Journal of Corporate Law Studies Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1080/14735970.2023.2287430
Jonathan Hardman
{"title":"对英国表面上的少数股东保护机制的制度分析","authors":"Jonathan Hardman","doi":"10.1080/14735970.2023.2287430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that there is a conundrum at the heart of the company law understanding of ostensible minority protection mechanisms (the derivative claim and unfair prejudice): they are terrib...","PeriodicalId":44517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An institutional analysis of UK ostensible minority shareholder protection mechanisms\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Hardman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14735970.2023.2287430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article argues that there is a conundrum at the heart of the company law understanding of ostensible minority protection mechanisms (the derivative claim and unfair prejudice): they are terrib...\",\"PeriodicalId\":44517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Corporate Law Studies\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Corporate Law Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2023.2287430\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2023.2287430","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,公司法对表面上的少数股东保护机制(派生索赔和不公平偏见)的理解存在一个核心难题:它们是畸形的、不公平的、不公正的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An institutional analysis of UK ostensible minority shareholder protection mechanisms
This article argues that there is a conundrum at the heart of the company law understanding of ostensible minority protection mechanisms (the derivative claim and unfair prejudice): they are terrib...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
The extension of vicarious liability in corporate groups Investor personhood: the case against paternalism and welfarism in corporate law Separate legal personality – an explanation and a defence Directors’ positive duty to act in the interests of the entity: shareholders’ interests bounded by corporate purpose Private credit: a renaissance in corporate finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1