基于情绪的旷课:制定支持正常出勤的地方当局多机构方法

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL British Journal of Special Education Pub Date : 2023-12-10 DOI:10.1111/1467-8578.12497
Shannon Corcoran, Catherine Kelly, Caroline Bond, Louise Knox
{"title":"基于情绪的旷课:制定支持正常出勤的地方当局多机构方法","authors":"Shannon Corcoran,&nbsp;Catherine Kelly,&nbsp;Caroline Bond,&nbsp;Louise Knox","doi":"10.1111/1467-8578.12497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>According to Government guidance in the UK, improving attendance is everyone's business. This article sets out the work of one local authority to develop their own multi-agency approach to reduce rates of emotionally based school non-attendance. The Research and Development in Organisations model provided a structure for the action research process, which consisted of cycles of action and reflection, including awareness raising, reflections on current practice, and the integration of stakeholder views, resulting in an organisational culture shift and the production of professional guidance materials. Content analysis suggests that the development of a localised approach required time, with multi-agency collaboration to promote shared ownership of the products and processes across all stakeholders and to enhance uptake of positive changes to practice. Factors that facilitated the process included response to local need, multi-agency collaboration and positive feedback, while diminished capacity and misconceptions about roles and responsibilities in monitoring and improving attendance were barriers to change. The findings provide further evidence for the role of multi-agency working in the development of strategic support for school attendance difficulties to promote organisational change. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of these approaches to better inform future support at an organisational level.</p>","PeriodicalId":46054,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Special Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"98-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8578.12497","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotionally based school non-attendance: Development of a local authority, multi-agency approach to supporting regular attendance\",\"authors\":\"Shannon Corcoran,&nbsp;Catherine Kelly,&nbsp;Caroline Bond,&nbsp;Louise Knox\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8578.12497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>According to Government guidance in the UK, improving attendance is everyone's business. This article sets out the work of one local authority to develop their own multi-agency approach to reduce rates of emotionally based school non-attendance. The Research and Development in Organisations model provided a structure for the action research process, which consisted of cycles of action and reflection, including awareness raising, reflections on current practice, and the integration of stakeholder views, resulting in an organisational culture shift and the production of professional guidance materials. Content analysis suggests that the development of a localised approach required time, with multi-agency collaboration to promote shared ownership of the products and processes across all stakeholders and to enhance uptake of positive changes to practice. Factors that facilitated the process included response to local need, multi-agency collaboration and positive feedback, while diminished capacity and misconceptions about roles and responsibilities in monitoring and improving attendance were barriers to change. The findings provide further evidence for the role of multi-agency working in the development of strategic support for school attendance difficulties to promote organisational change. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of these approaches to better inform future support at an organisational level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Special Education\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"98-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8578.12497\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Special Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8578.12497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8578.12497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据英国政府的指导意见,提高出勤率是每个人的事情。本文介绍了一个地方政府为降低因情绪原因造成的缺课率而制定的多机构方法。组织中的研究与发展模式为行动研究过程提供了一个结构,其中包括行动与反思的循环,包括提高认识、对当前实践的反思以及利益相关者观点的整合,从而实现组织文化的转变并编制专业指导材料。内容分析表明,本地化方法的开发需要时间,需要多机构合作,以促进所有利益相关者对产品和流程的共同所有权,并加强对实践积极变化的吸收。促进这一进程的因素包括对当地需求的回应、多机构合作和积极反馈,而能力减弱以及对监测和提高出勤率的角色和责任的错误认识则是变革的障碍。研究结果进一步证明了多机构合作在为学校出勤率困难提供战略支持以促进组织变革方面的作用。今后的研究应评估这些方法的有效性,以便更好地为今后在组织层面提供支持提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emotionally based school non-attendance: Development of a local authority, multi-agency approach to supporting regular attendance

According to Government guidance in the UK, improving attendance is everyone's business. This article sets out the work of one local authority to develop their own multi-agency approach to reduce rates of emotionally based school non-attendance. The Research and Development in Organisations model provided a structure for the action research process, which consisted of cycles of action and reflection, including awareness raising, reflections on current practice, and the integration of stakeholder views, resulting in an organisational culture shift and the production of professional guidance materials. Content analysis suggests that the development of a localised approach required time, with multi-agency collaboration to promote shared ownership of the products and processes across all stakeholders and to enhance uptake of positive changes to practice. Factors that facilitated the process included response to local need, multi-agency collaboration and positive feedback, while diminished capacity and misconceptions about roles and responsibilities in monitoring and improving attendance were barriers to change. The findings provide further evidence for the role of multi-agency working in the development of strategic support for school attendance difficulties to promote organisational change. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of these approaches to better inform future support at an organisational level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: This well-established and respected journal covers the whole range of learning difficulties relating to children in mainstream and special schools. It is widely read by nasen members as well as other practitioners, administrators advisers, teacher educators and researchers in the UK and overseas. The British Journal of Special Education is concerned with a wide range of special educational needs, and covers all levels of education pre-school, school, and post-school.
期刊最新文献
Social barriers faced by students with sensory impairment in higher education in Tanzania Issue Information Translational science in the science of reading: A case study Education policy development in England: Effective ‘mainstreaming’ of SEND provision Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1