口内扫描时间对数据准确性的影响

Cunliang Zhang, Xin Zhan, Fanghuan Wang, Ying Wu, Yingjie Yi, Jiali Meng, Guofeng Wu
{"title":"口内扫描时间对数据准确性的影响","authors":"Cunliang Zhang, Xin Zhan, Fanghuan Wang, Ying Wu, Yingjie Yi, Jiali Meng, Guofeng Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.10.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Statement of problem</h3><p>The use of intraoral scanners (IOSs) correlates with clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. While the accuracy of IOSs has been well evaluated, studies on the effect of scanning duration on data accuracy are limited.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the relationship between different scanning durations and the accuracy of the scanned data.</p><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Two experienced operators used the same intraoral scanner (TRIOS 3; 3Shape A/S) to scan a gypsum cast, but with 5 different scanning durations (30 seconds, 60 seconds, 90 seconds, 120 seconds, and 180 seconds), and the trueness of the scanned data was assessed. Ten scans for each duration group were performed, and all the acquired data were evaluated for precision analysis. In addition, each scanned complete arch cast was divided into anterior and posterior regions at the canine teeth, and the 3-way ANOVA test was used to assess the scanning trueness and precision of the scanned anterior and posterior dental arch.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The intraoral scanning results between the 2 operators were highly consistent. The data of the 30-second group showed the lowest trueness and precision (<em>P</em>&lt;.001), whereas no significant difference was found among the other groups (<em>P</em>&gt;.05). The trueness and precision of the scanning data in the posterior region was inferior to that in the anterior region (<em>P</em>&lt;.001).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The duration time of the intraoral scanning (ranging from 60 seconds to 180 seconds) did not influence the accuracy of the acquired data, while excessively rapid scanning adversely affected accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":501672,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of intraoral scanning duration on data accuracy\",\"authors\":\"Cunliang Zhang, Xin Zhan, Fanghuan Wang, Ying Wu, Yingjie Yi, Jiali Meng, Guofeng Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.10.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Statement of problem</h3><p>The use of intraoral scanners (IOSs) correlates with clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. While the accuracy of IOSs has been well evaluated, studies on the effect of scanning duration on data accuracy are limited.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the relationship between different scanning durations and the accuracy of the scanned data.</p><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Two experienced operators used the same intraoral scanner (TRIOS 3; 3Shape A/S) to scan a gypsum cast, but with 5 different scanning durations (30 seconds, 60 seconds, 90 seconds, 120 seconds, and 180 seconds), and the trueness of the scanned data was assessed. Ten scans for each duration group were performed, and all the acquired data were evaluated for precision analysis. In addition, each scanned complete arch cast was divided into anterior and posterior regions at the canine teeth, and the 3-way ANOVA test was used to assess the scanning trueness and precision of the scanned anterior and posterior dental arch.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The intraoral scanning results between the 2 operators were highly consistent. The data of the 30-second group showed the lowest trueness and precision (<em>P</em>&lt;.001), whereas no significant difference was found among the other groups (<em>P</em>&gt;.05). The trueness and precision of the scanning data in the posterior region was inferior to that in the anterior region (<em>P</em>&lt;.001).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The duration time of the intraoral scanning (ranging from 60 seconds to 180 seconds) did not influence the accuracy of the acquired data, while excessively rapid scanning adversely affected accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.10.022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.10.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题陈述口内扫描仪(IOS)的使用与临床效果和患者满意度相关。材料和方法两名经验丰富的操作员使用同一台口内扫描仪(TRIOS 3; 3Shape A/S)扫描石膏模型,但使用了 5 种不同的扫描持续时间(30 秒、60 秒、90 秒、120 秒和 180 秒),并对扫描数据的真实性进行了评估。每个持续时间组进行 10 次扫描,并对获得的所有数据进行精确度分析评估。此外,将每个扫描的完整牙弓模型在犬齿处分为前区和后区,并使用 3 方方差分析检验评估扫描前后牙弓的真实度和精确度。30 秒组的数据显示真实度和精确度最低(P< .001),而其他各组之间无显著差异(P> .05)。结论 口腔内扫描的持续时间(从 60 秒到 180 秒不等)不会影响所获数据的准确性,而过快的扫描则会对准确性产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of intraoral scanning duration on data accuracy

Statement of problem

The use of intraoral scanners (IOSs) correlates with clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. While the accuracy of IOSs has been well evaluated, studies on the effect of scanning duration on data accuracy are limited.

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the relationship between different scanning durations and the accuracy of the scanned data.

Material and methods

Two experienced operators used the same intraoral scanner (TRIOS 3; 3Shape A/S) to scan a gypsum cast, but with 5 different scanning durations (30 seconds, 60 seconds, 90 seconds, 120 seconds, and 180 seconds), and the trueness of the scanned data was assessed. Ten scans for each duration group were performed, and all the acquired data were evaluated for precision analysis. In addition, each scanned complete arch cast was divided into anterior and posterior regions at the canine teeth, and the 3-way ANOVA test was used to assess the scanning trueness and precision of the scanned anterior and posterior dental arch.

Results

The intraoral scanning results between the 2 operators were highly consistent. The data of the 30-second group showed the lowest trueness and precision (P<.001), whereas no significant difference was found among the other groups (P>.05). The trueness and precision of the scanning data in the posterior region was inferior to that in the anterior region (P<.001).

Conclusions

The duration time of the intraoral scanning (ranging from 60 seconds to 180 seconds) did not influence the accuracy of the acquired data, while excessively rapid scanning adversely affected accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of altering the dispensing methods of resin-based cements on their physical and bonding qualities. Factors affecting accuracy in the additive manufacturing of interim dental prostheses: A systematic review. Evaluation of the optical and surface properties of monolithic CAD-CAM ceramics after simulated tooth-brushing. Evaluation of axial displacement and torque loss of Morse-type prosthetic abutments of different angular tapers to their respective implants. Prospective clinical-radiological study of the survival and behavior of short implants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1