遗忘与故意遗漏之间的证词文献

Q4 Arts and Humanities Voprosy Literatury Pub Date : 2023-12-08 DOI:10.31425/0042-8795-2023-6-94-105
K. L. Filimonova
{"title":"遗忘与故意遗漏之间的证词文献","authors":"K. L. Filimonova","doi":"10.31425/0042-8795-2023-6-94-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prison camp texts constitute a very important stratum of 20th-c. literature. On their way to the reader, they overcome the barriers of fear and reluctance to immerse oneself into a complex and traumatic narrative, a recurrent risk of oblivion, and repeated suppression by censorship — on behalf of the authorities and educational institutions as well as society in general. Russian and Polish literature about gulags not only shares the same trauma and publication destiny, but also common topics, methods, and approaches to describing the unutterable experience. Two writers that embody this process — Herling-Grudziński and Shalamov — never met in person, but succeeded in conveying essential messages to the reader about the destructive and corrupting effect of a prison camp, the senselessness of forced labour, and the dehumanization and degradation of a person trapped in such an environment. The literary dialogue between the two authors contains a powerful system of reference for the study of 20th-c. Polish and Russian prison camp prose.","PeriodicalId":52245,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Literatury","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literature of testimony between oblivion and deliberate omission\",\"authors\":\"K. L. Filimonova\",\"doi\":\"10.31425/0042-8795-2023-6-94-105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prison camp texts constitute a very important stratum of 20th-c. literature. On their way to the reader, they overcome the barriers of fear and reluctance to immerse oneself into a complex and traumatic narrative, a recurrent risk of oblivion, and repeated suppression by censorship — on behalf of the authorities and educational institutions as well as society in general. Russian and Polish literature about gulags not only shares the same trauma and publication destiny, but also common topics, methods, and approaches to describing the unutterable experience. Two writers that embody this process — Herling-Grudziński and Shalamov — never met in person, but succeeded in conveying essential messages to the reader about the destructive and corrupting effect of a prison camp, the senselessness of forced labour, and the dehumanization and degradation of a person trapped in such an environment. The literary dialogue between the two authors contains a powerful system of reference for the study of 20th-c. Polish and Russian prison camp prose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Literatury\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Literatury\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2023-6-94-105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Literatury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2023-6-94-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

战俘营文本构成了20 -c时期一个非常重要的阶层。文学。在通往读者的路上,他们克服了恐惧和不愿沉浸在复杂而痛苦的叙事中的障碍,克服了被遗忘的反复风险,克服了审查制度的反复压制——这些审查制度代表了当局、教育机构和整个社会。关于古拉格的俄罗斯和波兰文学不仅有着相同的创伤和出版命运,而且有着共同的主题、方法和方法来描述难以形容的经历。体现这一过程的两位作家——Herling-Grudziński和沙拉莫夫——从未见过面,但成功地向读者传达了一些重要信息:战俘营的破坏性和腐败效应,强迫劳动的无意义性,以及被困在这种环境中的人的非人化和堕落。两位作者的文学对话为20世纪文学研究提供了强有力的参考体系。波兰和俄国战俘营散文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Literature of testimony between oblivion and deliberate omission
Prison camp texts constitute a very important stratum of 20th-c. literature. On their way to the reader, they overcome the barriers of fear and reluctance to immerse oneself into a complex and traumatic narrative, a recurrent risk of oblivion, and repeated suppression by censorship — on behalf of the authorities and educational institutions as well as society in general. Russian and Polish literature about gulags not only shares the same trauma and publication destiny, but also common topics, methods, and approaches to describing the unutterable experience. Two writers that embody this process — Herling-Grudziński and Shalamov — never met in person, but succeeded in conveying essential messages to the reader about the destructive and corrupting effect of a prison camp, the senselessness of forced labour, and the dehumanization and degradation of a person trapped in such an environment. The literary dialogue between the two authors contains a powerful system of reference for the study of 20th-c. Polish and Russian prison camp prose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Literatury
Voprosy Literatury Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
期刊最新文献
Shapiro, J. (2022). 1599, A year in the life of William Shakespeare. Translated by E. Lutsenko. Afterword by E. Lutsenko. Ed. by Y. Fridstein. Moscow: Tsentr knigi Rudomino. (In Russ.) A railway modernity. Izmalkovo train station in Ivan Bunin’s work Evocations of Nekrasov’s trench prose in Elena Rzhevskaya’s novellas Klim Samgin and an encyclopaedic genius of the era. On Gorky’s God-building pursuit Smirnova, N. (2023). Literary fragment and unfinishable text: Conception and reading. Moscow: Kanon-Plyus. (In Russ.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1