农业补贴对农户决策的影响:一种可分离的家庭模型方法

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI:10.3389/fsufs.2023.1295704
Priyanka Lal, B. S. Chandel, R. Tiwari, Mohamed A. El-Sheikh, Sheikh Mansoor, Alok Kumar, Gyanendra Singh, M. Lal, Ravinder Kumar
{"title":"农业补贴对农户决策的影响:一种可分离的家庭模型方法","authors":"Priyanka Lal, B. S. Chandel, R. Tiwari, Mohamed A. El-Sheikh, Sheikh Mansoor, Alok Kumar, Gyanendra Singh, M. Lal, Ravinder Kumar","doi":"10.3389/fsufs.2023.1295704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study employs a separable household model to estimate the effect of agricultural subsidies on production and consumption decisions taken by farm households. The study used data from a household survey using a pre-tested schedule to develop and calibrate an agricultural household model.First, we calculated a price index for the model. The index was higher for non-agricultural commodity groups in all the categories of farm households. Expenditure on non-agricultural commodity groups was more than agricultural commodity groups.Results indicated that for the agricultural commodity group, the estimated coefficients of linear expenditure system (LES) model were positive and less than one for all farm household categories except for the wage-price coefficient which was found to be negative. The estimates of profit function in the study area depict that the variable inputs were negatively related to the profit function and the fixed inputs were positively related to profit. Our study highlights a few crucial points – First, the removal of subsidies will decrease the demand for electricity, concentrate and irrigation by 80, 73 and 70 %, respectively. Second, removing subsidies will not only affect the demand for inputs but will also lead to a decline in the consumption demand for both agricultural and non-agricultural commodities. Third, this effect was found to be more prominent in the small and medium categories of farm households.","PeriodicalId":36666,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","volume":"133 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of agricultural subsidies on farm household decisions: a separable household model approach\",\"authors\":\"Priyanka Lal, B. S. Chandel, R. Tiwari, Mohamed A. El-Sheikh, Sheikh Mansoor, Alok Kumar, Gyanendra Singh, M. Lal, Ravinder Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsufs.2023.1295704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study employs a separable household model to estimate the effect of agricultural subsidies on production and consumption decisions taken by farm households. The study used data from a household survey using a pre-tested schedule to develop and calibrate an agricultural household model.First, we calculated a price index for the model. The index was higher for non-agricultural commodity groups in all the categories of farm households. Expenditure on non-agricultural commodity groups was more than agricultural commodity groups.Results indicated that for the agricultural commodity group, the estimated coefficients of linear expenditure system (LES) model were positive and less than one for all farm household categories except for the wage-price coefficient which was found to be negative. The estimates of profit function in the study area depict that the variable inputs were negatively related to the profit function and the fixed inputs were positively related to profit. Our study highlights a few crucial points – First, the removal of subsidies will decrease the demand for electricity, concentrate and irrigation by 80, 73 and 70 %, respectively. Second, removing subsidies will not only affect the demand for inputs but will also lead to a decline in the consumption demand for both agricultural and non-agricultural commodities. Third, this effect was found to be more prominent in the small and medium categories of farm households.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems\",\"volume\":\"133 38\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1295704\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1295704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用可分离家庭模型来评估农业补贴对农户生产和消费决策的影响。该研究使用了一项家庭调查的数据,使用预先测试的时间表来开发和校准农业家庭模型。首先,我们计算了模型的价格指数。在所有类别的农户中,非农商品组的指数都较高。非农业商品组的支出高于农业商品组。结果表明,对于农产品组,线性支出系统(LES)模型的估计系数为正,除工资-价格系数为负外,其他农户类别的估计系数均小于1。研究区域的利润函数估计表明,可变投入与利润函数负相关,固定投入与利润正相关。我们的研究强调了几个关键点——首先,取消补贴将使电力、浓缩和灌溉的需求分别减少80%、73%和70%。其次,取消补贴不仅会影响对投入的需求,还会导致对农业和非农业商品的消费需求下降。第三,这种效应在中小农户中更为突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of agricultural subsidies on farm household decisions: a separable household model approach
This study employs a separable household model to estimate the effect of agricultural subsidies on production and consumption decisions taken by farm households. The study used data from a household survey using a pre-tested schedule to develop and calibrate an agricultural household model.First, we calculated a price index for the model. The index was higher for non-agricultural commodity groups in all the categories of farm households. Expenditure on non-agricultural commodity groups was more than agricultural commodity groups.Results indicated that for the agricultural commodity group, the estimated coefficients of linear expenditure system (LES) model were positive and less than one for all farm household categories except for the wage-price coefficient which was found to be negative. The estimates of profit function in the study area depict that the variable inputs were negatively related to the profit function and the fixed inputs were positively related to profit. Our study highlights a few crucial points – First, the removal of subsidies will decrease the demand for electricity, concentrate and irrigation by 80, 73 and 70 %, respectively. Second, removing subsidies will not only affect the demand for inputs but will also lead to a decline in the consumption demand for both agricultural and non-agricultural commodities. Third, this effect was found to be more prominent in the small and medium categories of farm households.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Horticulture
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.40%
发文量
575
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Management interventions of pearl millet systems for attaining cereal self-sufficiency in Senegal Adoption of processing technologies and innovative food preservation techniques: findings from smallholders in the Lindi Region in Tanzania Adapting to urban gardening in China: how will policymaking help migrant and native gardeners? Supporting Inuit food sovereignty through collaborative research of an at-risk caribou herd Impact of irrigation on vulnerability of winter wheat under extreme climate change scenario: a case study of North China Plain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1