多囊卵巢综合征妇女体内脂肪连接蛋白与瘦素比值作用的系统回顾和元分析

Q3 Medicine Siriraj Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.33192/smj.v75i12.265452
Archie F. Iskandar, Nicolas Daniel Widjanarko, Felicia Grizelda Suryatenggara, Rosalia Sylfiasari, Leonardo Leonardo, Nadhea Debrinita Surya, Christian Ardianto
{"title":"多囊卵巢综合征妇女体内脂肪连接蛋白与瘦素比值作用的系统回顾和元分析","authors":"Archie F. Iskandar, Nicolas Daniel Widjanarko, Felicia Grizelda Suryatenggara, Rosalia Sylfiasari, Leonardo Leonardo, Nadhea Debrinita Surya, Christian Ardianto","doi":"10.33192/smj.v75i12.265452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: PCOS or Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome, a multifaceted disorder marked by disruptions in endocrine and metabolic processes, influences reproductive age women. The most commonly used criteria for diagnosing this condition are the Rotterdam 2003 and the National Institutes of Health Consensus 1990 guidelines. Recent studies are currently focusing on novel biomarkers, such as adiponectin and leptin to gain deeper insights on the intricate pathophysiology of PCOS. Therefore, this review aimed to consolidate the importance of the A:L (adiponectin to leptin) ratio as a potential and promising biomarker for PCOS.\nMaterials and Methods: The method followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Furthermore, MEDLINE, Proquest, and EBSCOhost databases were used to obtain eligible studies published up to February 2023. This study was registered in PROSPERO on April 2, 2023 with registration number CRD42023411754. ESHRE/ASRM or Rotterdam Guideline was used as the diagnosis criteria for women with PCOS. To examine the studies' heterogeneity, the I2 statistic and Cochran's Q test were utilized. Meanwhile, the evaluation on publication bias visually employed a funnel plot and was confirmed through Egger's test and rank correlation test. Data analysis was conducted with JASP 0.17.1, and statistical significance was characterized as a p-value below 0.05.\nResults: In the systematic review, a total of nine studies were incorporated, and seven studies were used in the subsequent meta-analysis. Each paper showcased a reduced A:L ratio in women with PCOS, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) among PCOS and control groups of 0.49 (CI: 0.37 - 0.61). The residual heterogeneity test yielded a p-value of 0.069, and no publication bias indication both pre and post intervention (p=0.002).\nConclusion: Referring to the findings, the A:L ratio was notably lower in PCOS patients. Consequently, the A:L ratio holds promise as a novel and potential biomarker for PCOS.","PeriodicalId":37270,"journal":{"name":"Siriraj Medical Journal","volume":"114 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Role of Adiponectin to Leptin Ratio in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Archie F. Iskandar, Nicolas Daniel Widjanarko, Felicia Grizelda Suryatenggara, Rosalia Sylfiasari, Leonardo Leonardo, Nadhea Debrinita Surya, Christian Ardianto\",\"doi\":\"10.33192/smj.v75i12.265452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: PCOS or Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome, a multifaceted disorder marked by disruptions in endocrine and metabolic processes, influences reproductive age women. The most commonly used criteria for diagnosing this condition are the Rotterdam 2003 and the National Institutes of Health Consensus 1990 guidelines. Recent studies are currently focusing on novel biomarkers, such as adiponectin and leptin to gain deeper insights on the intricate pathophysiology of PCOS. Therefore, this review aimed to consolidate the importance of the A:L (adiponectin to leptin) ratio as a potential and promising biomarker for PCOS.\\nMaterials and Methods: The method followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Furthermore, MEDLINE, Proquest, and EBSCOhost databases were used to obtain eligible studies published up to February 2023. This study was registered in PROSPERO on April 2, 2023 with registration number CRD42023411754. ESHRE/ASRM or Rotterdam Guideline was used as the diagnosis criteria for women with PCOS. To examine the studies' heterogeneity, the I2 statistic and Cochran's Q test were utilized. Meanwhile, the evaluation on publication bias visually employed a funnel plot and was confirmed through Egger's test and rank correlation test. Data analysis was conducted with JASP 0.17.1, and statistical significance was characterized as a p-value below 0.05.\\nResults: In the systematic review, a total of nine studies were incorporated, and seven studies were used in the subsequent meta-analysis. Each paper showcased a reduced A:L ratio in women with PCOS, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) among PCOS and control groups of 0.49 (CI: 0.37 - 0.61). The residual heterogeneity test yielded a p-value of 0.069, and no publication bias indication both pre and post intervention (p=0.002).\\nConclusion: Referring to the findings, the A:L ratio was notably lower in PCOS patients. Consequently, the A:L ratio holds promise as a novel and potential biomarker for PCOS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Siriraj Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"114 28\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Siriraj Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i12.265452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siriraj Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i12.265452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是一种以内分泌和代谢过程紊乱为特征的多面性疾病,影响育龄妇女。诊断这种疾病最常用的标准是2003年鹿特丹和1990年美国国立卫生研究院共识指南。最近的研究主要集中在新的生物标志物,如脂联素和瘦素,以深入了解多囊卵巢综合征复杂的病理生理。因此,本综述旨在巩固A:L(脂联素与瘦素)比值作为PCOS潜在和有前景的生物标志物的重要性。材料和方法:该方法遵循PRISMA 2020指南。此外,使用MEDLINE、Proquest和EBSCOhost数据库获取截至2023年2月发表的符合条件的研究。本研究于2023年4月2日在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42023411754。采用ESHRE/ASRM或鹿特丹指南作为PCOS女性的诊断标准。为了检验研究的异质性,采用I2统计量和Cochran’s Q检验。对发表偏倚的评价在视觉上采用漏斗图,并通过Egger检验和秩相关检验进行验证。采用JASP 0.17.1进行数据分析,p < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:在系统评价中,共有9项研究被纳入,7项研究被用于随后的meta分析。每篇论文都显示PCOS女性的a:L比降低,PCOS组与对照组的标准化平均差异(SMD)为0.49 (CI: 0.37 - 0.61)。残差异质性检验的p值为0.069,干预前后均无发表偏倚迹象(p=0.002)。结论:综合上述结果,PCOS患者A:L比值明显降低。因此,A:L比值有望成为多囊卵巢综合征的一种新的潜在生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Role of Adiponectin to Leptin Ratio in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
Objective: PCOS or Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome, a multifaceted disorder marked by disruptions in endocrine and metabolic processes, influences reproductive age women. The most commonly used criteria for diagnosing this condition are the Rotterdam 2003 and the National Institutes of Health Consensus 1990 guidelines. Recent studies are currently focusing on novel biomarkers, such as adiponectin and leptin to gain deeper insights on the intricate pathophysiology of PCOS. Therefore, this review aimed to consolidate the importance of the A:L (adiponectin to leptin) ratio as a potential and promising biomarker for PCOS. Materials and Methods: The method followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Furthermore, MEDLINE, Proquest, and EBSCOhost databases were used to obtain eligible studies published up to February 2023. This study was registered in PROSPERO on April 2, 2023 with registration number CRD42023411754. ESHRE/ASRM or Rotterdam Guideline was used as the diagnosis criteria for women with PCOS. To examine the studies' heterogeneity, the I2 statistic and Cochran's Q test were utilized. Meanwhile, the evaluation on publication bias visually employed a funnel plot and was confirmed through Egger's test and rank correlation test. Data analysis was conducted with JASP 0.17.1, and statistical significance was characterized as a p-value below 0.05. Results: In the systematic review, a total of nine studies were incorporated, and seven studies were used in the subsequent meta-analysis. Each paper showcased a reduced A:L ratio in women with PCOS, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) among PCOS and control groups of 0.49 (CI: 0.37 - 0.61). The residual heterogeneity test yielded a p-value of 0.069, and no publication bias indication both pre and post intervention (p=0.002). Conclusion: Referring to the findings, the A:L ratio was notably lower in PCOS patients. Consequently, the A:L ratio holds promise as a novel and potential biomarker for PCOS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Siriraj Medical Journal
Siriraj Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Incidences, Characteristics, Management and Outcomes of Different Subtypes of Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study Optimizing Perioperative Care for Elderly Surgical Patients: A Review of Strategies and Evidence-Based Practices Comparison between the Standard Teaching and the Thai Version of Blended Teaching on Basic Airway Management in Siriraj Medical Students Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) and Outcomes in Preoperative Fast-track Geriatric Patients with Hip Fracture: A Single-center Retrospective Study Effectiveness of Smartphone Applications vs Conventional Care in Warfarin Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Time in the Therapeutic Range
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1