{"title":"私营医疗机构参与印度南部的国家结核病防治计划","authors":"Anand D Meundi, J. Richardus","doi":"10.5588/pha.23.0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SETTING: India has the highest number of new TB cases worldwide. The participation of private providers (PPs) in the National TB Elimination Programme (NTEP) has remained suboptimal. OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences, barriers and facilitators about their participation in the NTEP as perceived by PPs working in varied settings. DESIGN: Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were used to engage PPs to obtain their views on participation in the NTEP. Framework and thematic content analysis was used to analyse qualitative data. RESULTS: Non-availability of a comprehensive range of diagnostics and lack of flexibility in the NTEP were barriers to participation in NTEP. PPs were predisposed to think that NTEP was for those who could not afford to purchase medications. Attitudes and previous experiences with NTEP made them sceptical about the NTEP regimen. Although more frequent interactions were sought with NTEP, some bitterness about previous interactions was perceived. CONCLUSION: Challenges identified by PPs for the NTEP include improvement of the quality of TB care, especially at the lower levels of care, availability of a comprehensive range of diagnostics, being friendly to PPs and patients, more frequent interactions with PPs, and more caring conversations with patients at NTEP centres.","PeriodicalId":46239,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Action","volume":" 22","pages":"142 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participation of private providers in the National TB Programme in South India\",\"authors\":\"Anand D Meundi, J. Richardus\",\"doi\":\"10.5588/pha.23.0032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SETTING: India has the highest number of new TB cases worldwide. The participation of private providers (PPs) in the National TB Elimination Programme (NTEP) has remained suboptimal. OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences, barriers and facilitators about their participation in the NTEP as perceived by PPs working in varied settings. DESIGN: Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were used to engage PPs to obtain their views on participation in the NTEP. Framework and thematic content analysis was used to analyse qualitative data. RESULTS: Non-availability of a comprehensive range of diagnostics and lack of flexibility in the NTEP were barriers to participation in NTEP. PPs were predisposed to think that NTEP was for those who could not afford to purchase medications. Attitudes and previous experiences with NTEP made them sceptical about the NTEP regimen. Although more frequent interactions were sought with NTEP, some bitterness about previous interactions was perceived. CONCLUSION: Challenges identified by PPs for the NTEP include improvement of the quality of TB care, especially at the lower levels of care, availability of a comprehensive range of diagnostics, being friendly to PPs and patients, more frequent interactions with PPs, and more caring conversations with patients at NTEP centres.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Action\",\"volume\":\" 22\",\"pages\":\"142 - 147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5588/pha.23.0032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/pha.23.0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Participation of private providers in the National TB Programme in South India
SETTING: India has the highest number of new TB cases worldwide. The participation of private providers (PPs) in the National TB Elimination Programme (NTEP) has remained suboptimal. OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences, barriers and facilitators about their participation in the NTEP as perceived by PPs working in varied settings. DESIGN: Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were used to engage PPs to obtain their views on participation in the NTEP. Framework and thematic content analysis was used to analyse qualitative data. RESULTS: Non-availability of a comprehensive range of diagnostics and lack of flexibility in the NTEP were barriers to participation in NTEP. PPs were predisposed to think that NTEP was for those who could not afford to purchase medications. Attitudes and previous experiences with NTEP made them sceptical about the NTEP regimen. Although more frequent interactions were sought with NTEP, some bitterness about previous interactions was perceived. CONCLUSION: Challenges identified by PPs for the NTEP include improvement of the quality of TB care, especially at the lower levels of care, availability of a comprehensive range of diagnostics, being friendly to PPs and patients, more frequent interactions with PPs, and more caring conversations with patients at NTEP centres.
期刊介绍:
Launched on 1 May 2011, Public Health Action (PHA) is an official publication of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union). It is an open access, online journal available world-wide to physicians, health workers, researchers, professors, students and decision-makers, including public health centres, medical, university and pharmaceutical libraries, hospitals, clinics, foundations and institutions. PHA is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that actively encourages, communicates and reports new knowledge, dialogue and controversy in health systems and services for people in vulnerable and resource-limited communities — all topics that reflect the mission of The Union, Health solutions for the poor.