对联合国 "仇恨言论 "战略和指南的评论:一些法律考虑因素

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1177/09240519231211815
Audrey Fino
{"title":"对联合国 \"仇恨言论 \"战略和指南的评论:一些法律考虑因素","authors":"Audrey Fino","doi":"10.1177/09240519231211815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article critically reviews the UN Strategy and Guidance on Hate Speech as examples of practice and uses them as a springboard to engage with the current legal framework. In doing so, it considers not only international human rights law but the related fields of international criminal and humanitarian law. Building upon the UN Strategy and Guidance, whilst also informed by their shortcomings, the article offers a definition and typology of ‘hate speech’ firmly rooted in the rigours of the rules of interpretation, as crystallised in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. The law-based approach ensures more transparency, certainty, and predictability of the law of free speech and its limitations. As such, it should also garner the support of more States, the primary duty-holders in international human rights law and lead to a more holistic approach to countering ‘hate speech’, thus achieving the aims of the UN Strategy.","PeriodicalId":44610,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights","volume":" 34","pages":"190 - 213"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critique of the UN Strategy and Guidance on ‘Hate Speech’: Some Legal Considerations\",\"authors\":\"Audrey Fino\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09240519231211815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article critically reviews the UN Strategy and Guidance on Hate Speech as examples of practice and uses them as a springboard to engage with the current legal framework. In doing so, it considers not only international human rights law but the related fields of international criminal and humanitarian law. Building upon the UN Strategy and Guidance, whilst also informed by their shortcomings, the article offers a definition and typology of ‘hate speech’ firmly rooted in the rigours of the rules of interpretation, as crystallised in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. The law-based approach ensures more transparency, certainty, and predictability of the law of free speech and its limitations. As such, it should also garner the support of more States, the primary duty-holders in international human rights law and lead to a more holistic approach to countering ‘hate speech’, thus achieving the aims of the UN Strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights\",\"volume\":\" 34\",\"pages\":\"190 - 213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09240519231211815\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09240519231211815","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以实践为例,对《联合国关于仇恨言论的战略和指南》进行了批判性审查,并将其作为参与当前法律框架的跳板。在这样做时,它不仅考虑到国际人权法,而且考虑到国际刑法和人道主义法的有关领域。在《联合国战略和指南》的基础上,同时也了解到它们的不足之处,本文提供了一个“仇恨言论”的定义和类型,这一定义和类型牢牢扎根于《维也纳条约法公约》明确规定的严格的解释规则。以法律为基础的方法确保言论自由及其限制的法律更具透明度、确定性和可预测性。因此,它还应获得更多国家的支持,这些国家是国际人权法的主要义务持有人,并导致采取更全面的方法来打击“仇恨言论”,从而实现联合国战略的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A critique of the UN Strategy and Guidance on ‘Hate Speech’: Some Legal Considerations
This article critically reviews the UN Strategy and Guidance on Hate Speech as examples of practice and uses them as a springboard to engage with the current legal framework. In doing so, it considers not only international human rights law but the related fields of international criminal and humanitarian law. Building upon the UN Strategy and Guidance, whilst also informed by their shortcomings, the article offers a definition and typology of ‘hate speech’ firmly rooted in the rigours of the rules of interpretation, as crystallised in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. The law-based approach ensures more transparency, certainty, and predictability of the law of free speech and its limitations. As such, it should also garner the support of more States, the primary duty-holders in international human rights law and lead to a more holistic approach to countering ‘hate speech’, thus achieving the aims of the UN Strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Human rights are universal and indivisible. Their fundamental importance makes it essential for anyone with an interest in the field to keep abreast of the latest developments. The Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights (NQHR) is an academic peer-reviewed journal that publishes the latest evolutions in the promotion and protection of human rights from around the world. The NQHR includes multidisciplinary articles addressing human rights issues from an international perspective. In addition, the Quarterly also publishes recent speeches and lectures delivered on the topic of human rights, as well as a section on new books and articles in the field of human rights. The Quarterly employs a double-blind peer review process, and the international editorial board of leading human rights scholars guarantees the maintenance of the highest standard of articles published.
期刊最新文献
Recent publications September 2024 Religious dress in the healthcare setting: Unpacking legal arguments and balancing individual rights Sounding the alarm for digital agriculture: Examining risks to the human rights to science and food Cross-border surrogacy and the European Convention on Human Rights: The Strasbourg Court caught between “fait accompli”, “ordre public”, and the best interest of the child Berlin techno goes intangible cultural heritage: Modern music, the cultural appropriation debate, and the international convention on the elimination of all forms of racial discrimination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1