对初级医疗中的恐慌症或抑郁症患者进行基于 CBT 和电子健康支持的个案管理:概念验证结果

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Cognitive Therapy Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1007/s41811-023-00195-9
{"title":"对初级医疗中的恐慌症或抑郁症患者进行基于 CBT 和电子健康支持的个案管理:概念验证结果","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s41811-023-00195-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span> <h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Evaluation of a team-based intervention in primary care that includes cognitive behavioural therapy elements and case management and was supported by eHealth components in patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (PD ± AG) and/or depression. In a two-armed cluster-randomised controlled trial (cRCT), mental health conditions were assessed by the Mental Health Index (MHI-5), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS), Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS), Mobility Inventory for Agoraphobia (MIA), and Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) at baseline (T0), after 6 months (T1), and after 12 months (T2). Scores were analysed as differences from baseline using a mixed linear model with general practitioner (GP) as a random intercept and treatment, time point, and respective baseline value as fixed factors. The majority of participants (mean age 54 years, SD 12.8 years) were women (<em>n</em> = 40, 67.8%). We found consistent mean effects in favour of the intervention group (MHI-5 index, 6.66 [−7.38; 20.70]; PACIC, 15.92 [4.58; 27.26]; PHQ-9, −3.43 [−5.71; −1.14]; OASIS, −2.89 [−5.41; −0.37]). A cautious interpretation indicates promising effects of the intervention. Obstacles to recruitment included the workload for GPs and medical assistants (MAs), potential reservations regarding eHealth, and the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Trial registration:</h3> <p>The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00016622) on February 22nd, 2019. https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00016622.</p> </span>","PeriodicalId":46972,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cognitive Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CBT-Based and eHealth-Supported Case Management for Patients with Panic Disorder or Depression in Primary Care: Results of a Proof of Concept\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41811-023-00195-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span> <h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Evaluation of a team-based intervention in primary care that includes cognitive behavioural therapy elements and case management and was supported by eHealth components in patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (PD ± AG) and/or depression. In a two-armed cluster-randomised controlled trial (cRCT), mental health conditions were assessed by the Mental Health Index (MHI-5), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS), Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS), Mobility Inventory for Agoraphobia (MIA), and Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) at baseline (T0), after 6 months (T1), and after 12 months (T2). Scores were analysed as differences from baseline using a mixed linear model with general practitioner (GP) as a random intercept and treatment, time point, and respective baseline value as fixed factors. The majority of participants (mean age 54 years, SD 12.8 years) were women (<em>n</em> = 40, 67.8%). We found consistent mean effects in favour of the intervention group (MHI-5 index, 6.66 [−7.38; 20.70]; PACIC, 15.92 [4.58; 27.26]; PHQ-9, −3.43 [−5.71; −1.14]; OASIS, −2.89 [−5.41; −0.37]). A cautious interpretation indicates promising effects of the intervention. Obstacles to recruitment included the workload for GPs and medical assistants (MAs), potential reservations regarding eHealth, and the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Trial registration:</h3> <p>The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00016622) on February 22nd, 2019. https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00016622.</p> </span>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cognitive Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cognitive Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-023-00195-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-023-00195-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 针对恐慌症伴有或不伴有广场恐惧症(PD±AG)和/或抑郁症患者,评估一项以团队为基础的初级医疗干预措施,该干预措施包括认知行为疗法元素和个案管理,并由电子健康组件提供支持。在一项双臂分组随机对照试验(cRCT)中,分别在基线(T0)、6 个月后(T1)和 12 个月后(T2)通过心理健康指数 (MHI-5)、患者健康问卷 (PHQ-9)、整体焦虑严重程度和损害量表 (OASIS)、恐慌和广场恐惧症量表 (PAS)、广场恐惧症行动量表 (MIA) 以及慢性病护理患者评估 (PACIC) 对患者的心理健康状况进行了评估。采用混合线性模型,以全科医生(GP)为随机截距,以治疗方法、时间点和各自的基线值为固定因素,分析得分与基线值的差异。大多数参与者为女性(平均年龄 54 岁,标准差 12.8 岁)(n = 40,67.8%)。我们发现干预组的平均效果一致(MHI-5 指数,6.66 [-7.38; 20.70];PACIC,15.92 [4.58; 27.26];PHQ-9,-3.43 [-5.71; -1.14]; OASIS,-2.89 [-5.41; -0.37])。谨慎的解释表明干预效果良好。招募的障碍包括全科医生和医疗助理(MA)的工作量、对电子健康的潜在保留意见以及 COVID-19 大流行的爆发。 试验注册:该研究于2019年2月22日在德国临床试验注册中心(DRKS00016622)注册。https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00016622。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CBT-Based and eHealth-Supported Case Management for Patients with Panic Disorder or Depression in Primary Care: Results of a Proof of Concept

Abstract

Evaluation of a team-based intervention in primary care that includes cognitive behavioural therapy elements and case management and was supported by eHealth components in patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (PD ± AG) and/or depression. In a two-armed cluster-randomised controlled trial (cRCT), mental health conditions were assessed by the Mental Health Index (MHI-5), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS), Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS), Mobility Inventory for Agoraphobia (MIA), and Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) at baseline (T0), after 6 months (T1), and after 12 months (T2). Scores were analysed as differences from baseline using a mixed linear model with general practitioner (GP) as a random intercept and treatment, time point, and respective baseline value as fixed factors. The majority of participants (mean age 54 years, SD 12.8 years) were women (n = 40, 67.8%). We found consistent mean effects in favour of the intervention group (MHI-5 index, 6.66 [−7.38; 20.70]; PACIC, 15.92 [4.58; 27.26]; PHQ-9, −3.43 [−5.71; −1.14]; OASIS, −2.89 [−5.41; −0.37]). A cautious interpretation indicates promising effects of the intervention. Obstacles to recruitment included the workload for GPs and medical assistants (MAs), potential reservations regarding eHealth, and the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Trial registration:

The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00016622) on February 22nd, 2019. https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00016622.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: From an editorial board of leading international authorities, this state-of-the-science journal addresses all scientific and clinical aspects of cognitive therapy. Featured are: Empirical research studies Cutting-edge theoretical articles Literature reviews and meta-analyses Special focus issues The scope of coverage encompasses basic research on cognitive clinical processes, innovative assessment and treatment technologies, expert perspectives on specific clinical problems and populations, and critical issues in translating research to practice. Recent thematic issues have included Recent Advances in Suicide Research: Mediators and Moderators of Risk and Resilience; Cognitive Mechanisms of Change in the Treatment of Depression; and Combined CBT and Pharmacotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Immediate and Longitudinal Effects of Emotion Reactivity and Deviation from the Balanced Time Perspective on Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety: Latent Growth Curve Modeling Emotional Schema Therapy for Adults Diagnosed with Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review Toward a Better Understanding of Who Is Likely to Be Susceptible to the Effects of Rumination on Obsessive–Compulsive Symptoms: An Explorative Analysis Scoping Review for the Adaptation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to the Arab Culture Computer-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention for Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Disorders: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1