黑白花母牛和荷斯坦-弗里斯兰母牛的骨盆尺寸和难产发生率。

Z Nogalski, W Barański
{"title":"黑白花母牛和荷斯坦-弗里斯兰母牛的骨盆尺寸和难产发生率。","authors":"Z Nogalski, W Barański","doi":"10.24425/pjvs.2023.148288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Black-and-White (BW) breed, which until recently had dominated in Europe, was replaced by the Holstein-Friesian (HF) breed. As a result, the incidence of dystocia has increased. Dystocia occurs most frequently in heifers, and it is associated with high calf weight and/or too narrow pelvic openings in heifers. The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the effects of pelvic dimensions and rump angle on calving ease in two cattle breeds. The research was carried out in four barns where BW and HF cattle were used. The course of parturition was evaluated in 317 heifers (BW, n=169; HF, n=148) based on direct observations. Calves were weighed, external and internal pelvic measurements were performed (using the Rice pelvimeter), and rump angle was determined in heifers. Based on the course of parturition, heifers of both breeds were divided into easy calving (EC) and difficult calving (DC) groups. The frequency of DC was 24.3% in HF heifers and 13.1% in BW heifers. In comparison with DC heifers, EC heifers had a larger pelvic area, in particular the internal dimensions of the bony pelvis, and a higher rump angle. In comparison with BW heifers, HF heifers had a smaller rump angle, a narrower pelvis and a lower ratio of pelvic area to calf weight. High dystocia rates in HF heifers could result from a relatively large fetus size and a less preferable pelvic size and rump angle. High variation in the internal pelvic dimensions in HF heifers indicates that the incidence of dystocia can be reduced through selection for a larger pelvic size and the optimal rump angle.</p>","PeriodicalId":94175,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of veterinary sciences","volume":"26 4","pages":"687-693"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pelvic dimensions and occurrence of dystocia in Black-and-White and Holstein-Friesian heifers.\",\"authors\":\"Z Nogalski, W Barański\",\"doi\":\"10.24425/pjvs.2023.148288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Black-and-White (BW) breed, which until recently had dominated in Europe, was replaced by the Holstein-Friesian (HF) breed. As a result, the incidence of dystocia has increased. Dystocia occurs most frequently in heifers, and it is associated with high calf weight and/or too narrow pelvic openings in heifers. The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the effects of pelvic dimensions and rump angle on calving ease in two cattle breeds. The research was carried out in four barns where BW and HF cattle were used. The course of parturition was evaluated in 317 heifers (BW, n=169; HF, n=148) based on direct observations. Calves were weighed, external and internal pelvic measurements were performed (using the Rice pelvimeter), and rump angle was determined in heifers. Based on the course of parturition, heifers of both breeds were divided into easy calving (EC) and difficult calving (DC) groups. The frequency of DC was 24.3% in HF heifers and 13.1% in BW heifers. In comparison with DC heifers, EC heifers had a larger pelvic area, in particular the internal dimensions of the bony pelvis, and a higher rump angle. In comparison with BW heifers, HF heifers had a smaller rump angle, a narrower pelvis and a lower ratio of pelvic area to calf weight. High dystocia rates in HF heifers could result from a relatively large fetus size and a less preferable pelvic size and rump angle. High variation in the internal pelvic dimensions in HF heifers indicates that the incidence of dystocia can be reduced through selection for a larger pelvic size and the optimal rump angle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish journal of veterinary sciences\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"687-693\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish journal of veterinary sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24425/pjvs.2023.148288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish journal of veterinary sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/pjvs.2023.148288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

黑白(BW)品种直到最近一直在欧洲占主导地位,但后来被荷斯坦-弗里斯兰(HF)品种所取代。因此,子宫收缩症的发病率有所增加。子宫窘迫症最常发生在母牛身上,与母牛犊牛体重过高和/或骨盆开口过窄有关。本研究旨在回顾性评估骨盆尺寸和臀部角度对两个牛种产犊难易程度的影响。研究在四个牛舍中进行,分别使用体重牛和高频牛。根据直接观察,对 317 头小母牛(BW,n=169;HF,n=148)的分娩过程进行了评估。对犊牛进行称重、骨盆外部和内部测量(使用赖斯骨盆测量仪),并测定小母牛的臀角。根据分娩过程,两个品种的母牛被分为易产组(EC)和难产组(DC)。高频母牛的难产率为 24.3%,体重母牛的难产率为 13.1%。与难产母牛相比,易产母牛的骨盆面积更大,尤其是骨盆内部尺寸更大,臀角更高。与体重母牛相比,高频母牛的臀角较小,骨盆较窄,骨盆面积与犊牛体重的比率较低。高频小母牛的难产率高可能是由于胎儿相对较大、骨盆尺寸和臀角较小所致。高频母牛骨盆内部尺寸的巨大差异表明,可以通过选择较大的骨盆尺寸和最佳臀角来降低难产的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pelvic dimensions and occurrence of dystocia in Black-and-White and Holstein-Friesian heifers.

The Black-and-White (BW) breed, which until recently had dominated in Europe, was replaced by the Holstein-Friesian (HF) breed. As a result, the incidence of dystocia has increased. Dystocia occurs most frequently in heifers, and it is associated with high calf weight and/or too narrow pelvic openings in heifers. The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the effects of pelvic dimensions and rump angle on calving ease in two cattle breeds. The research was carried out in four barns where BW and HF cattle were used. The course of parturition was evaluated in 317 heifers (BW, n=169; HF, n=148) based on direct observations. Calves were weighed, external and internal pelvic measurements were performed (using the Rice pelvimeter), and rump angle was determined in heifers. Based on the course of parturition, heifers of both breeds were divided into easy calving (EC) and difficult calving (DC) groups. The frequency of DC was 24.3% in HF heifers and 13.1% in BW heifers. In comparison with DC heifers, EC heifers had a larger pelvic area, in particular the internal dimensions of the bony pelvis, and a higher rump angle. In comparison with BW heifers, HF heifers had a smaller rump angle, a narrower pelvis and a lower ratio of pelvic area to calf weight. High dystocia rates in HF heifers could result from a relatively large fetus size and a less preferable pelvic size and rump angle. High variation in the internal pelvic dimensions in HF heifers indicates that the incidence of dystocia can be reduced through selection for a larger pelvic size and the optimal rump angle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An isothermal recombinase polymerase assay coupled with lateral flow dipstick for differentiation of pseudorabies virus wild isolates and gE-deleted vaccine strains. Cardiovascular problems in rabbits in reference to hypothyroidism - a four-year retrospective study. Carriage of antimicrobial resistance genes in Escherichia coli of bovine origin. Cellular distribution of some intermediate filaments in the rat mammary gland during pregnancy, lactation and involution. Development of a capsid protein-based ELISA for the detection of PCV2 antibodies in swine serum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1