缺乏预防蛇咬的对照研究:快速回顾。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Pub Date : 2024-04-06 DOI:10.1093/trstmh/trad088
Chaturaka Rodrigo, Ariaranee Gnanathasan
{"title":"缺乏预防蛇咬的对照研究:快速回顾。","authors":"Chaturaka Rodrigo, Ariaranee Gnanathasan","doi":"10.1093/trstmh/trad088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally, snakebites cause an estimated 80 000-140 000 deaths annually. While there are evidence-based recommendations for managing snakebite victims, recommendations on the prevention of snakebites are limited to expert opinions. We conducted a rapid review to summarise evidence from human studies with a control group on preventing snakebites. Searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL and EMBASE with inclusive search terms without language or time limits only yielded three eligible studies (one case control study and two prospective controlled clinical studies), highlighting a knowledge gap. Two studies in Nepal by the same group showed that health education of stakeholders and sleeping under a bednet can significantly reduce snakebite incidence (p<0.05), but these observations are not confirmed elsewhere, and because of the high risk of bias the certainty of evidence was low. The third study from Sri Lanka, which assessed if sleeping above ground would prevent snakebites, had inconclusive results. This demonstrates an urgent need for studies with a control group to guide evidence-based recommendations for snakebite prevention. Potential interventions tested can range from low-cost measures such as wearing appropriate footwear in resource-limited settings to testing the efficacy of chemical, biological (e.g. rodent control) or device-based methods and community-supported platforms tracking snakebite sightings with real-time geolocation data in highly resourced settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23218,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lack of controlled studies on snakebite prevention: a rapid review.\",\"authors\":\"Chaturaka Rodrigo, Ariaranee Gnanathasan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/trstmh/trad088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Globally, snakebites cause an estimated 80 000-140 000 deaths annually. While there are evidence-based recommendations for managing snakebite victims, recommendations on the prevention of snakebites are limited to expert opinions. We conducted a rapid review to summarise evidence from human studies with a control group on preventing snakebites. Searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL and EMBASE with inclusive search terms without language or time limits only yielded three eligible studies (one case control study and two prospective controlled clinical studies), highlighting a knowledge gap. Two studies in Nepal by the same group showed that health education of stakeholders and sleeping under a bednet can significantly reduce snakebite incidence (p<0.05), but these observations are not confirmed elsewhere, and because of the high risk of bias the certainty of evidence was low. The third study from Sri Lanka, which assessed if sleeping above ground would prevent snakebites, had inconclusive results. This demonstrates an urgent need for studies with a control group to guide evidence-based recommendations for snakebite prevention. Potential interventions tested can range from low-cost measures such as wearing appropriate footwear in resource-limited settings to testing the efficacy of chemical, biological (e.g. rodent control) or device-based methods and community-supported platforms tracking snakebite sightings with real-time geolocation data in highly resourced settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trad088\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trad088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,蛇咬伤每年估计造成 80 000-140 000 人死亡。虽然在处理蛇咬伤患者方面有循证建议,但关于预防蛇咬伤的建议却仅限于专家意见。我们进行了一次快速回顾,总结了有对照组的人类研究中有关预防蛇咬的证据。我们在PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、CINAHL和EMBASE上进行了无语言和时间限制的搜索,只找到了三项符合条件的研究(一项病例对照研究和两项前瞻性临床对照研究),凸显了知识空白。同一研究小组在尼泊尔进行的两项研究表明,对利益相关者进行健康教育和睡在蚊帐里可显著降低蛇咬伤发病率(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lack of controlled studies on snakebite prevention: a rapid review.

Globally, snakebites cause an estimated 80 000-140 000 deaths annually. While there are evidence-based recommendations for managing snakebite victims, recommendations on the prevention of snakebites are limited to expert opinions. We conducted a rapid review to summarise evidence from human studies with a control group on preventing snakebites. Searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL and EMBASE with inclusive search terms without language or time limits only yielded three eligible studies (one case control study and two prospective controlled clinical studies), highlighting a knowledge gap. Two studies in Nepal by the same group showed that health education of stakeholders and sleeping under a bednet can significantly reduce snakebite incidence (p<0.05), but these observations are not confirmed elsewhere, and because of the high risk of bias the certainty of evidence was low. The third study from Sri Lanka, which assessed if sleeping above ground would prevent snakebites, had inconclusive results. This demonstrates an urgent need for studies with a control group to guide evidence-based recommendations for snakebite prevention. Potential interventions tested can range from low-cost measures such as wearing appropriate footwear in resource-limited settings to testing the efficacy of chemical, biological (e.g. rodent control) or device-based methods and community-supported platforms tracking snakebite sightings with real-time geolocation data in highly resourced settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
115
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene publishes authoritative and impactful original, peer-reviewed articles and reviews on all aspects of tropical medicine.
期刊最新文献
Foetal outcome of Leptospira and Rickettsial infections during pregnancy: a systematic review. A combined tropical medicine and psychiatry approach to patients with possible delusional infestation. 'My feet cannot stand on their own': podoconiosis patient healthcare expenditures and income impacts in Rwanda. Risk of human leptospirosis in Colombia: spatiotemporal analysis and related hydroclimatic factors. Understanding noma: WHO's recognition and the path forward in global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1