评估金融毒性的简易筛选工具。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Oncology nursing forum Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI:10.1188/24.ONF.17-23
Melissa Beauchemin, Rohit Ranjit Raghunathan, Alessandra Taboada, Erik Harden, Samrawit Solomon, Dawn L Hershman
{"title":"评估金融毒性的简易筛选工具。","authors":"Melissa Beauchemin, Rohit Ranjit Raghunathan, Alessandra Taboada, Erik Harden, Samrawit Solomon, Dawn L Hershman","doi":"10.1188/24.ONF.17-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the utility of brief financial screening items to facilitate the implementation of routine financial toxicity screening.</p><p><strong>Sample & setting: </strong>50 women with breast cancer completed a one-time survey that included the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST): A FACIT Measure of Financial Toxicity, a visual analog scale, and a brief sociodemographic questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods & variables: </strong>Survey responses were examined to assess the psychometric properties of individual COST items and the visual analog scale by calculating Cronbach's alpha and Pearson's correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean COST was 21.4, and 27 respondents met criteria for financial toxicity (a COST lower than 22). As expected, all items correlated strongly to the overall COST, but four items (items 3, 6, 8, and 10) performed strongest (r > 0.8).</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>This study provides evidence for individual COST items to be used as brief screening items. Future research should test the utility of these items in larger sample sizes with a more diverse representation of patients by age, race, ethnicity, and tumor type and stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":19549,"journal":{"name":"Oncology nursing forum","volume":"51 1","pages":"17-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Brief Screening Tool for Assessment of Financial Toxicity.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Beauchemin, Rohit Ranjit Raghunathan, Alessandra Taboada, Erik Harden, Samrawit Solomon, Dawn L Hershman\",\"doi\":\"10.1188/24.ONF.17-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the utility of brief financial screening items to facilitate the implementation of routine financial toxicity screening.</p><p><strong>Sample & setting: </strong>50 women with breast cancer completed a one-time survey that included the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST): A FACIT Measure of Financial Toxicity, a visual analog scale, and a brief sociodemographic questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods & variables: </strong>Survey responses were examined to assess the psychometric properties of individual COST items and the visual analog scale by calculating Cronbach's alpha and Pearson's correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean COST was 21.4, and 27 respondents met criteria for financial toxicity (a COST lower than 22). As expected, all items correlated strongly to the overall COST, but four items (items 3, 6, 8, and 10) performed strongest (r > 0.8).</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>This study provides evidence for individual COST items to be used as brief screening items. Future research should test the utility of these items in larger sample sizes with a more diverse representation of patients by age, race, ethnicity, and tumor type and stage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology nursing forum\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"17-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology nursing forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1188/24.ONF.17-23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology nursing forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1188/24.ONF.17-23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探索简短财务筛查项目的实用性,以促进常规财务毒性筛查的实施:50 名乳腺癌妇女完成了一次性调查,调查内容包括财务毒性综合评分 (COST)、FACIT 财务毒性测量、视觉模拟量表和简短的财务毒性筛查项目:方法与变量:通过计算Cronbach's alpha和Pearson's correlation coefficients,对调查反馈进行检查,以评估COST各项目和视觉模拟量表的心理测量特性:平均 COST 为 21.4,27 名受访者符合财务毒性标准(COST 低于 22)。不出所料,所有项目都与总体 COST 密切相关,但四个项目(项目 3、6、8 和 10)的相关性最强(r > 0.8):本研究为个别 COST 项目用作简短筛查项目提供了证据。未来的研究应在样本量更大、患者年龄、种族、民族、肿瘤类型和分期更多样化的情况下测试这些项目的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Brief Screening Tool for Assessment of Financial Toxicity.

Objectives: To explore the utility of brief financial screening items to facilitate the implementation of routine financial toxicity screening.

Sample & setting: 50 women with breast cancer completed a one-time survey that included the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST): A FACIT Measure of Financial Toxicity, a visual analog scale, and a brief sociodemographic questionnaire.

Methods & variables: Survey responses were examined to assess the psychometric properties of individual COST items and the visual analog scale by calculating Cronbach's alpha and Pearson's correlation coefficients.

Results: The mean COST was 21.4, and 27 respondents met criteria for financial toxicity (a COST lower than 22). As expected, all items correlated strongly to the overall COST, but four items (items 3, 6, 8, and 10) performed strongest (r > 0.8).

Implications for nursing: This study provides evidence for individual COST items to be used as brief screening items. Future research should test the utility of these items in larger sample sizes with a more diverse representation of patients by age, race, ethnicity, and tumor type and stage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology nursing forum
Oncology nursing forum 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Oncology Nursing Forum, an official publication of ONS, is to Convey research information related to practice, technology, education, and leadership. Disseminate oncology nursing research and evidence-based practice to enhance transdisciplinary quality cancer care. Stimulate discussion of critical issues relevant to oncology nursing.
期刊最新文献
Barriers to Surveillance Mammography Adherence in Korean Breast Cancer Survivors. Build Bridges, Not Walls: A Call for Collaboration in Oncology With PhD and DNP Colleagues to Improve Research. Expectancy Effect of Acupuncture on Cancer-Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Exploring Caregiver Burden and Related Factors Among Primary Caregivers of Patients With Cancer in Taiwan. Feasibility Study of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Treatment-Related Sequelae, and Inflammatory Markers in Breast Cancer Survivors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1