杰勒德-曼利-霍普金斯

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 POETRY VICTORIAN POETRY Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.1353/vp.2023.a915658
Veronica Alfano
{"title":"杰勒德-曼利-霍普金斯","authors":"Veronica Alfano","doi":"10.1353/vp.2023.a915658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Gerard Manley Hopkins <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Veronica Alfano (bio) </li> </ul> <p>Last year’s Hopkins scholarship provided a pleasing balance between close attention to the subtleties of the poet’s language and wide-ranging claims about his legacy.</p> <p>Emma Mason’s article “Reading Christian Experience” (<em>Modern Language Quarterly</em> 83, no. 4 [2022]: 521–537) is provocative and powerfully written. She views the work of Hopkins and Christina Rossetti through the lens of kenosis—that is, the doctrine that Christ emptied himself of divinity in order to become fully human and submit to death. For both poets, says Mason, kenosis redefines Christianity through “inner stillness, deferential being, and humility” (p. 523). Furthermore, both writers gender this concept, with Rossetti using it to adumbrate a feminized version of spiritual authority and Hopkins enlisting it as a model of ideal gentlemanliness. As Mason demonstrates—via one of Hopkins’s biblical exegeses in an 1883 letter to Robert Bridges and via his 1883 poem “The Blessed Virgin Compared to the Air We Breathe”—this poet “offers a direct critique of muscular models of Christianity, promoting instead a vulnerable and uncertain ideal” as he implicitly compares Christ to “a Victorian gentleman who signifies and acts like a Victorian woman” (pp. 530–531). <strong>[End Page 382]</strong></p> <p>Here a bit more exploration of the ramifications of these gender-related claims would have been welcome. To what extent is Rossetti challenging the “pretense that humility and passivity are necessarily ‘female’” (p. 527), and to what extent is she implying that Christ’s patient humbleness makes him womanly? And in light of Hopkins’s tormented relationship to his own sexuality, what does it mean for him to feminize Christ?</p> <p>All the same, throughout the article, Mason elegantly broadens the relevance of her theological analysis. Rossetti’s interest in the Tractarian principle of analogy is shown to rely on a kenotic “image of unity in diversity” (p. 530), as is Hopkins’s understanding of Mary as both fleshly and spiritual, as is the essential paradox of the Trinity itself. Mason’s closing arguments are her most ambitious: acknowledging that many modern readers will recoil from the focus on feminized self-abnegation she identifies in Hopkins, she counters that kenosis is in fact profoundly anti-fundamentalist. Because it is “predicated on a vulnerable model of power that directly rejects relationships structured by oppression or violence” (p. 534), it can motivate Christian models of social justice, ecological activism, and feminism (which she links to Hopkins’s praise of Mary in “The Blessed Virgin”). And because kenosis demands “a reading practice that perceives and understands relationships not as linear or binary but as coinherent, multiple, and interconnected” (p. 525), it is a potent tool for literary criticism as well. Ultimately, Mason employs Hopkins to make a compelling case that nineteenth-century scholars who engage with religious thought must account not only for the details of doctrine and the activities of worship but also for the emotional experience of faith.</p> <p>Rossetti’s Anglo-Catholicism and Hopkins’s admiration for her—he writes that “the simple beauty of her work cannot be matched”—make these two a natural pairing (<em>The Collected Works of Gerard Manley Hopkins</em>, 8 vols., Lesley Higgins and Michael Suarez, eds. [Oxford Univ. Press, 2006–], 1: 216). Harriet Kramer Linkin, however, considers Hopkins alongside a female poet to whom he has rarely been compared: “Gerard Manley Hopkins in Dialogue with Felicia Hemans” (<em>VP</em> 60, no. 3 [Fall 2022]: 325–344) opens with the tantalizing observation that Hemans’s influence on Hopkins is both noteworthy and all but unexamined.</p> <p>Linkin’s intertextual analysis of “The Wreck of the Deutschland” is especially keen-eyed, highlighting the ways in which Hopkins not only echoes but also revises his predecessor. In Hemans’s “Casabianca,” a poem that was soon to become the bane of many a Victorian schoolchild, a devoted boy perishes in a shipwreck as he calls out to an unresponsive father. Yet the tall nun who calls out to Christ in “The Wreck of the Deutschland” is able to <strong>[End Page 383]</strong> commune with Him, allowing Hopkins to transform what he may have seen as Hemans’s “rallying cry for patriarchal patriotism” into a “bid for spiritual patriotism” (p...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":54107,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN POETRY","volume":"195 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gerard Manley Hopkins\",\"authors\":\"Veronica Alfano\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/vp.2023.a915658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Gerard Manley Hopkins <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Veronica Alfano (bio) </li> </ul> <p>Last year’s Hopkins scholarship provided a pleasing balance between close attention to the subtleties of the poet’s language and wide-ranging claims about his legacy.</p> <p>Emma Mason’s article “Reading Christian Experience” (<em>Modern Language Quarterly</em> 83, no. 4 [2022]: 521–537) is provocative and powerfully written. She views the work of Hopkins and Christina Rossetti through the lens of kenosis—that is, the doctrine that Christ emptied himself of divinity in order to become fully human and submit to death. For both poets, says Mason, kenosis redefines Christianity through “inner stillness, deferential being, and humility” (p. 523). Furthermore, both writers gender this concept, with Rossetti using it to adumbrate a feminized version of spiritual authority and Hopkins enlisting it as a model of ideal gentlemanliness. As Mason demonstrates—via one of Hopkins’s biblical exegeses in an 1883 letter to Robert Bridges and via his 1883 poem “The Blessed Virgin Compared to the Air We Breathe”—this poet “offers a direct critique of muscular models of Christianity, promoting instead a vulnerable and uncertain ideal” as he implicitly compares Christ to “a Victorian gentleman who signifies and acts like a Victorian woman” (pp. 530–531). <strong>[End Page 382]</strong></p> <p>Here a bit more exploration of the ramifications of these gender-related claims would have been welcome. To what extent is Rossetti challenging the “pretense that humility and passivity are necessarily ‘female’” (p. 527), and to what extent is she implying that Christ’s patient humbleness makes him womanly? And in light of Hopkins’s tormented relationship to his own sexuality, what does it mean for him to feminize Christ?</p> <p>All the same, throughout the article, Mason elegantly broadens the relevance of her theological analysis. Rossetti’s interest in the Tractarian principle of analogy is shown to rely on a kenotic “image of unity in diversity” (p. 530), as is Hopkins’s understanding of Mary as both fleshly and spiritual, as is the essential paradox of the Trinity itself. Mason’s closing arguments are her most ambitious: acknowledging that many modern readers will recoil from the focus on feminized self-abnegation she identifies in Hopkins, she counters that kenosis is in fact profoundly anti-fundamentalist. Because it is “predicated on a vulnerable model of power that directly rejects relationships structured by oppression or violence” (p. 534), it can motivate Christian models of social justice, ecological activism, and feminism (which she links to Hopkins’s praise of Mary in “The Blessed Virgin”). And because kenosis demands “a reading practice that perceives and understands relationships not as linear or binary but as coinherent, multiple, and interconnected” (p. 525), it is a potent tool for literary criticism as well. Ultimately, Mason employs Hopkins to make a compelling case that nineteenth-century scholars who engage with religious thought must account not only for the details of doctrine and the activities of worship but also for the emotional experience of faith.</p> <p>Rossetti’s Anglo-Catholicism and Hopkins’s admiration for her—he writes that “the simple beauty of her work cannot be matched”—make these two a natural pairing (<em>The Collected Works of Gerard Manley Hopkins</em>, 8 vols., Lesley Higgins and Michael Suarez, eds. [Oxford Univ. Press, 2006–], 1: 216). Harriet Kramer Linkin, however, considers Hopkins alongside a female poet to whom he has rarely been compared: “Gerard Manley Hopkins in Dialogue with Felicia Hemans” (<em>VP</em> 60, no. 3 [Fall 2022]: 325–344) opens with the tantalizing observation that Hemans’s influence on Hopkins is both noteworthy and all but unexamined.</p> <p>Linkin’s intertextual analysis of “The Wreck of the Deutschland” is especially keen-eyed, highlighting the ways in which Hopkins not only echoes but also revises his predecessor. In Hemans’s “Casabianca,” a poem that was soon to become the bane of many a Victorian schoolchild, a devoted boy perishes in a shipwreck as he calls out to an unresponsive father. Yet the tall nun who calls out to Christ in “The Wreck of the Deutschland” is able to <strong>[End Page 383]</strong> commune with Him, allowing Hopkins to transform what he may have seen as Hemans’s “rallying cry for patriarchal patriotism” into a “bid for spiritual patriotism” (p...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VICTORIAN POETRY\",\"volume\":\"195 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VICTORIAN POETRY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/vp.2023.a915658\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VICTORIAN POETRY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vp.2023.a915658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 杰勒德-曼利-霍普金斯 维罗妮卡-阿尔法诺(简历 去年的霍普金斯奖学金在密切关注诗人语言的微妙之处和对其遗产的广泛主张之间取得了令人愉悦的平衡。艾玛-梅森(Emma Mason)的文章 "阅读基督教经验"(《现代语言季刊》第 83 卷第 4 期 [2022]: 521-537)极具煽动性,文笔有力。她从 "神性"(kenosis)的角度来看待霍普金斯和克里斯蒂娜-罗塞蒂的作品,"神性 "指的是基督为了成为完全的人并向死亡屈服而清空了自己的神性。梅森说,对于这两位诗人来说,"神性 "通过 "内心的静止、顺从的存在和谦卑"(第 523 页)重新定义了基督教。此外,两位作家都将这一概念性别化,罗塞蒂用它来阐释女性化的精神权威,霍普金斯则将它作为理想绅士的典范。梅森通过霍普金斯在 1883 年写给罗伯特-布里奇斯(Robert Bridges)的信中对《圣经》的注释之一,以及他在 1883 年创作的诗歌《圣母与我们呼吸的空气相比》证明,这位诗人 "直接批判了基督教的肌肉模式,转而提倡一种脆弱而不确定的理想",他含蓄地将基督比作 "维多利亚时代的绅士,他的标志和行为都像维多利亚时代的女人"(第 530-531 页)。[末页382]在这里,如果能对这些与性别相关的主张的影响进行更多的探讨,将会受到欢迎。罗塞蒂在多大程度上挑战了 "谦卑和被动必然是'女性'的伪装"(第 527 页),她又在多大程度上暗示基督的耐心谦卑使其具有女性特质?考虑到霍普金斯对自己性欲的折磨,他将基督女性化意味着什么?尽管如此,梅森在整篇文章中优雅地拓宽了其神学分析的相关性。罗塞蒂对托勒密派类比原则的兴趣依赖于 "多样性中的统一性形象"(第530页),霍普金斯对玛丽既是肉体的又是精神的理解也是如此,三位一体本身的本质悖论也是如此。梅森的最后论点是她最雄心勃勃的论点:她承认许多现代读者会对她在霍普金斯身上发现的女性化的自我否定感到反感,但她反驳说,基尼索斯实际上是深刻的反原教旨主义者。因为它 "以一种脆弱的权力模式为前提,直接摒弃压迫或暴力所构建的关系"(第 534 页),它可以激发基督教的社会正义、生态行动主义和女权主义模式(她将其与霍普金斯在《受祝福的圣母》中对玛利亚的赞美联系起来)。由于 "肯尼索斯 "要求 "一种阅读实践,这种阅读实践不是线性的或二元的,而是共生的、多重的和相互关联的"(第 525 页),因此它也是文学批评的有力工具。最终,梅森利用霍普金斯提出了一个令人信服的论点,即十九世纪研究宗教思想的学者不仅要考虑教义和崇拜活动的细节,还要考虑信仰的情感体验。罗塞蒂的盎格鲁天主教主义和霍普金斯对她的钦佩--他写道 "她作品的简洁之美无与伦比"--使二者自然而然地成为一对(《杰拉德-曼利-霍普金斯作品集》,8 卷,莱斯利-希金斯和迈克尔-苏亚雷斯编[牛津大学出版社,2007 年])。[牛津大学出版社,2006-],1: 216)。然而,Harriet Kramer Linkin 将霍普金斯与一位很少与之相提并论的女诗人相提并论:"Gerard Manley Hopkins in Dialogue with Felicia Hemans" (VP 60, no. 3 [Fall 2022]: 325-344)一开篇就提出了一个诱人的观点:Hemans 对霍普金斯的影响既值得注意,又未被研究。林金对 "德意志号沉船 "的互文分析尤为敏锐,强调了霍普金斯不仅呼应而且修正其前辈的方式。在海曼斯的《卡萨比安卡》中,一个虔诚的男孩在海难中呼唤毫无反应的父亲,却不幸遇难。然而,在《德意志号沉船事件》中呼唤基督的高个子修女却能够 [尾页 383]与基督交流,这让霍普金斯得以将他可能认为是海曼斯的 "父权爱国主义的号召 "转变为 "精神爱国主义的诉求"(第......页)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gerard Manley Hopkins
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Gerard Manley Hopkins
  • Veronica Alfano (bio)

Last year’s Hopkins scholarship provided a pleasing balance between close attention to the subtleties of the poet’s language and wide-ranging claims about his legacy.

Emma Mason’s article “Reading Christian Experience” (Modern Language Quarterly 83, no. 4 [2022]: 521–537) is provocative and powerfully written. She views the work of Hopkins and Christina Rossetti through the lens of kenosis—that is, the doctrine that Christ emptied himself of divinity in order to become fully human and submit to death. For both poets, says Mason, kenosis redefines Christianity through “inner stillness, deferential being, and humility” (p. 523). Furthermore, both writers gender this concept, with Rossetti using it to adumbrate a feminized version of spiritual authority and Hopkins enlisting it as a model of ideal gentlemanliness. As Mason demonstrates—via one of Hopkins’s biblical exegeses in an 1883 letter to Robert Bridges and via his 1883 poem “The Blessed Virgin Compared to the Air We Breathe”—this poet “offers a direct critique of muscular models of Christianity, promoting instead a vulnerable and uncertain ideal” as he implicitly compares Christ to “a Victorian gentleman who signifies and acts like a Victorian woman” (pp. 530–531). [End Page 382]

Here a bit more exploration of the ramifications of these gender-related claims would have been welcome. To what extent is Rossetti challenging the “pretense that humility and passivity are necessarily ‘female’” (p. 527), and to what extent is she implying that Christ’s patient humbleness makes him womanly? And in light of Hopkins’s tormented relationship to his own sexuality, what does it mean for him to feminize Christ?

All the same, throughout the article, Mason elegantly broadens the relevance of her theological analysis. Rossetti’s interest in the Tractarian principle of analogy is shown to rely on a kenotic “image of unity in diversity” (p. 530), as is Hopkins’s understanding of Mary as both fleshly and spiritual, as is the essential paradox of the Trinity itself. Mason’s closing arguments are her most ambitious: acknowledging that many modern readers will recoil from the focus on feminized self-abnegation she identifies in Hopkins, she counters that kenosis is in fact profoundly anti-fundamentalist. Because it is “predicated on a vulnerable model of power that directly rejects relationships structured by oppression or violence” (p. 534), it can motivate Christian models of social justice, ecological activism, and feminism (which she links to Hopkins’s praise of Mary in “The Blessed Virgin”). And because kenosis demands “a reading practice that perceives and understands relationships not as linear or binary but as coinherent, multiple, and interconnected” (p. 525), it is a potent tool for literary criticism as well. Ultimately, Mason employs Hopkins to make a compelling case that nineteenth-century scholars who engage with religious thought must account not only for the details of doctrine and the activities of worship but also for the emotional experience of faith.

Rossetti’s Anglo-Catholicism and Hopkins’s admiration for her—he writes that “the simple beauty of her work cannot be matched”—make these two a natural pairing (The Collected Works of Gerard Manley Hopkins, 8 vols., Lesley Higgins and Michael Suarez, eds. [Oxford Univ. Press, 2006–], 1: 216). Harriet Kramer Linkin, however, considers Hopkins alongside a female poet to whom he has rarely been compared: “Gerard Manley Hopkins in Dialogue with Felicia Hemans” (VP 60, no. 3 [Fall 2022]: 325–344) opens with the tantalizing observation that Hemans’s influence on Hopkins is both noteworthy and all but unexamined.

Linkin’s intertextual analysis of “The Wreck of the Deutschland” is especially keen-eyed, highlighting the ways in which Hopkins not only echoes but also revises his predecessor. In Hemans’s “Casabianca,” a poem that was soon to become the bane of many a Victorian schoolchild, a devoted boy perishes in a shipwreck as he calls out to an unresponsive father. Yet the tall nun who calls out to Christ in “The Wreck of the Deutschland” is able to [End Page 383] commune with Him, allowing Hopkins to transform what he may have seen as Hemans’s “rallying cry for patriarchal patriotism” into a “bid for spiritual patriotism” (p...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Founded in 1962 to further the aesthetic study of the poetry of the Victorian Period in Britain (1830–1914), Victorian Poetry publishes articles from a broad range of theoretical and critical angles, including but not confined to new historicism, feminism, and social and cultural issues. The journal has expanded its purview from the major figures of Victorian England (Tennyson, Browning, the Rossettis, etc.) to a wider compass of poets of all classes and gender identifications in nineteenth-century Britain and the Commonwealth. Victorian Poetry is edited by John B. Lamb and sponsored by the Department of English at West Virginia University.
期刊最新文献
Introduction: The Place of Victorian Poetry Keeping Faith in Victorian Poetry Reflections on Twenty Years in Victorian Poetry Victorian Women's Poetry and the Near-Death Experience of a Category Undisciplining Art Sisterhood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1