中国对优质体育教育的认识

IF 0.1 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Sports Studies Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.30819/iss.45-2.06
Walter Ho, Jiaxi Hu, Klaudia Rafael, Yang Yang Xie, Dilsad Ahmed, Min Liu, Tao Wang, Yimeng Wang
{"title":"中国对优质体育教育的认识","authors":"Walter Ho, Jiaxi Hu, Klaudia Rafael, Yang Yang Xie, Dilsad Ahmed, Min Liu, Tao Wang, Yimeng Wang","doi":"10.30819/iss.45-2.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Promoting quality physical education (QPE), regarded as the best way to induce quality\nlearning among children and adolescents, has received widespread attention. This study\ncontributes to the discourse on QPE by conducting a study in mainland China that involved\n437 physical education (PE) professionals from six administrative divisions of 30\nprovinces. The research adopted the questionnaire initially developed by the QPE research\nteam from the International Society for Comparative Physical Education and\nSport in 2018. Results indicated an overall mean of 7.39 in the QPE development. The\nhighest mean score was 7.73 in the Skill Development and Bodily Awareness (SDBA) dimension,\nand the lowest was 7.14 in Plans for Feasibility and Accessibility of PE (PFAPE).\nPE professionals with less work experience scored higher on the overall development of\nQPE and the eight dimensions. The QPE scores of East China and Central South China\nin all eight dimensions were significantly higher than those of Northwest China. These\nfindings indicate the importance of enhancing cognitive functioning strategies in developing\nQPE in mainland China. Recommendations include using a resource-input and intentional\nintervention model to investigate the differences in QPE development among\nthe regions in China.\n\n","PeriodicalId":40315,"journal":{"name":"International Sports Studies","volume":"50 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Perception of Quality Physical Education in China\",\"authors\":\"Walter Ho, Jiaxi Hu, Klaudia Rafael, Yang Yang Xie, Dilsad Ahmed, Min Liu, Tao Wang, Yimeng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.30819/iss.45-2.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Promoting quality physical education (QPE), regarded as the best way to induce quality\\nlearning among children and adolescents, has received widespread attention. This study\\ncontributes to the discourse on QPE by conducting a study in mainland China that involved\\n437 physical education (PE) professionals from six administrative divisions of 30\\nprovinces. The research adopted the questionnaire initially developed by the QPE research\\nteam from the International Society for Comparative Physical Education and\\nSport in 2018. Results indicated an overall mean of 7.39 in the QPE development. The\\nhighest mean score was 7.73 in the Skill Development and Bodily Awareness (SDBA) dimension,\\nand the lowest was 7.14 in Plans for Feasibility and Accessibility of PE (PFAPE).\\nPE professionals with less work experience scored higher on the overall development of\\nQPE and the eight dimensions. The QPE scores of East China and Central South China\\nin all eight dimensions were significantly higher than those of Northwest China. These\\nfindings indicate the importance of enhancing cognitive functioning strategies in developing\\nQPE in mainland China. Recommendations include using a resource-input and intentional\\nintervention model to investigate the differences in QPE development among\\nthe regions in China.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":40315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Sports Studies\",\"volume\":\"50 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Sports Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30819/iss.45-2.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Sports Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30819/iss.45-2.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

促进优质体育教育(QPE)被认为是提高儿童和青少年学习质量的最佳途径,已受到广泛关注。本研究在中国大陆开展了一项研究,涉及来自 30 个省的 6 个行政区的 437 名体育教育(PE)专业人员,为有关 QPE 的讨论做出了贡献。研究采用了国际体育比较学会 QPE 研究团队于 2018 年初步编制的问卷。结果表明,QPE 发展的总体均值为 7.39。工作经验较少的体育专业人员在QPE总体发展和八个维度上得分较高。华东地区和中南地区在所有八个维度上的 QPE 分数都明显高于西北地区。这些结果表明,加强认知功能策略对中国大陆的 QPE 发展非常重要。建议采用资源输入和有意干预模式来研究中国各地区 QPE 发展的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Perception of Quality Physical Education in China
Promoting quality physical education (QPE), regarded as the best way to induce quality learning among children and adolescents, has received widespread attention. This study contributes to the discourse on QPE by conducting a study in mainland China that involved 437 physical education (PE) professionals from six administrative divisions of 30 provinces. The research adopted the questionnaire initially developed by the QPE research team from the International Society for Comparative Physical Education and Sport in 2018. Results indicated an overall mean of 7.39 in the QPE development. The highest mean score was 7.73 in the Skill Development and Bodily Awareness (SDBA) dimension, and the lowest was 7.14 in Plans for Feasibility and Accessibility of PE (PFAPE). PE professionals with less work experience scored higher on the overall development of QPE and the eight dimensions. The QPE scores of East China and Central South China in all eight dimensions were significantly higher than those of Northwest China. These findings indicate the importance of enhancing cognitive functioning strategies in developing QPE in mainland China. Recommendations include using a resource-input and intentional intervention model to investigate the differences in QPE development among the regions in China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Sports Studies
International Sports Studies HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: International Sports Studies (ISS) is a scholarly journal in the field of physical education and sport with a unique focus. Its aim is to advance understanding and communication between members of the global community who share a professional, personal or scholarly interest in the state and development of physical education and sport around the world. International Sports Studies (ISS) is today without paradigmatic prejudice and reflects an eclectic approach to the task of understanding physical education and sport in the contemporary world. It asks only that its contributors can add to knowledge about international physical education and sport studies through studies involving comparisons between regional, national and international settings or by providing unique insights into specific national and local phenomena which contribute to an understanding that can be shared across as well as within national borders.
期刊最新文献
Quality Physical Education Perceptions Among PE Professionals: an Exploratory Factor Analysis Understanding Quality Physical Education from the Perspective of Asian PE Professionals The Perception of Quality Physical Education in China Voices from PE Professionals in Mindanao: Expectations Underlying Quality Physical Education Development Quality Physical Education (QPE) Measurement Tool Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1