通过熔融长丝制造(FFF)与选择性激光烧结(SLS)获得的尼龙 12 的三点弯曲响应

IF 0.7 4区 材料科学 Q4 METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING Archives of Metallurgy and Materials Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.24425/amm.2023.146210
M. N. BaBa, G. D. VoiNea, M.e. Lucaci
{"title":"通过熔融长丝制造(FFF)与选择性激光烧结(SLS)获得的尼龙 12 的三点弯曲响应","authors":"M. N. BaBa, G. D. VoiNea, M.e. Lucaci","doi":"10.24425/amm.2023.146210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyses the three-point bending behavior of Nylon 12 (Pa12) specimens produced using two additive manufacturing technologies (i.e., fused filament fabrication and selective laser sintering). a Nylon 12 commercially available filament (from Fiberlab S.a.) was selected to employ the fused filament fabrication method (FFF) with a Prusa 3D desktop printer, whereas Nylon 12 sintering powder (from Formlabs inc.) was chosen for selective laser sintering (SLS) using a benchtop industrial SLS platform, Formlabs Fuse 1, with a powder refresh ratio of 30%. The bending strength and flexural elasticity moduli were determined by following iSo 178:2019 standard specifications to assess the effect of two different technologies on the mechanical behavior of three-point bending specimens produced in three distinct build orientations (i.e., 0°, 45°, and 90°) relative to the printing platform. one-way aNoVa analysis, Tukey’s HSD, and Games-Howell tests are considered to assess the statistical variability of experimental data and compare the mean values of bending strength and flexural moduli. The testing results for the three orientations under question show notable differences and interesting similarities either in terms of strength or elasticity response for a significance p -level of 0.05.","PeriodicalId":8304,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Metallurgy and Materials","volume":" March","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-Point Bending Response of Nylon 12 Obtained by Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) Versus Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)\",\"authors\":\"M. N. BaBa, G. D. VoiNea, M.e. Lucaci\",\"doi\":\"10.24425/amm.2023.146210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study analyses the three-point bending behavior of Nylon 12 (Pa12) specimens produced using two additive manufacturing technologies (i.e., fused filament fabrication and selective laser sintering). a Nylon 12 commercially available filament (from Fiberlab S.a.) was selected to employ the fused filament fabrication method (FFF) with a Prusa 3D desktop printer, whereas Nylon 12 sintering powder (from Formlabs inc.) was chosen for selective laser sintering (SLS) using a benchtop industrial SLS platform, Formlabs Fuse 1, with a powder refresh ratio of 30%. The bending strength and flexural elasticity moduli were determined by following iSo 178:2019 standard specifications to assess the effect of two different technologies on the mechanical behavior of three-point bending specimens produced in three distinct build orientations (i.e., 0°, 45°, and 90°) relative to the printing platform. one-way aNoVa analysis, Tukey’s HSD, and Games-Howell tests are considered to assess the statistical variability of experimental data and compare the mean values of bending strength and flexural moduli. The testing results for the three orientations under question show notable differences and interesting similarities either in terms of strength or elasticity response for a significance p -level of 0.05.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Metallurgy and Materials\",\"volume\":\" March\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Metallurgy and Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24425/amm.2023.146210\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Metallurgy and Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/amm.2023.146210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了使用两种增材制造技术(即熔融长丝制造和选择性激光烧结)生产的尼龙 12 (Pa12) 试样的三点弯曲行为、尼龙 12 市售长丝(来自 Fiberlab S.a.)被选为使用 Prusa 3D 台式打印机的熔融长丝制造方法 (FFF),而尼龙 12 烧结粉末(来自 Formlabs inc.)被选为使用台式工业 SLS 平台 Formlabs Fuse 1 进行选择性激光烧结 (SLS),粉末刷新率为 30%。按照 iSo 178:2019 标准规范测定了弯曲强度和挠曲弹性模量,以评估两种不同技术对相对于打印平台的三个不同构建方向(即 0°、45° 和 90°)的三点弯曲试样的机械行为的影响。单向 aNoVa 分析、Tukey's HSD 和 Games-Howell 检验用于评估实验数据的统计变异性,并比较弯曲强度和挠曲弹性模量的平均值。在 0.05 的显著性 p 水平下,三个方向的测试结果在强度或弹性响应方面显示出明显的差异和有趣的相似性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Three-Point Bending Response of Nylon 12 Obtained by Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) Versus Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)
This study analyses the three-point bending behavior of Nylon 12 (Pa12) specimens produced using two additive manufacturing technologies (i.e., fused filament fabrication and selective laser sintering). a Nylon 12 commercially available filament (from Fiberlab S.a.) was selected to employ the fused filament fabrication method (FFF) with a Prusa 3D desktop printer, whereas Nylon 12 sintering powder (from Formlabs inc.) was chosen for selective laser sintering (SLS) using a benchtop industrial SLS platform, Formlabs Fuse 1, with a powder refresh ratio of 30%. The bending strength and flexural elasticity moduli were determined by following iSo 178:2019 standard specifications to assess the effect of two different technologies on the mechanical behavior of three-point bending specimens produced in three distinct build orientations (i.e., 0°, 45°, and 90°) relative to the printing platform. one-way aNoVa analysis, Tukey’s HSD, and Games-Howell tests are considered to assess the statistical variability of experimental data and compare the mean values of bending strength and flexural moduli. The testing results for the three orientations under question show notable differences and interesting similarities either in terms of strength or elasticity response for a significance p -level of 0.05.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Metallurgy and Materials
Archives of Metallurgy and Materials 工程技术-冶金工程
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The Archives of Metallurgy and Materials is covered in the following Institute for Scientific Information products: SciSearch (the Science Citation Index - Expanded), Research Alert, Materials Science Citation Index, and Current Contents / Engineering, Computing and Technology. Articles published in the Archives of Metallurgy and Materials are also indexed or abstracted by Cambridge Scientific Abstracts.
期刊最新文献
Performance of Cement Sand Brick Containing Bamboo Ash as Cement Replacement Material Effect of Stir Casting Process Parameters and Stirrer Blade Geometry on Mechanical Properties of Al MMCs – A Review Hybrid, Multiscale Numerical Simulations of the Equal Channel Angular Pressing (ECAP) using the Crystal Plasticity Theory Mechanical Properties, Machinability and Corrosion Resistance of Zamak5 Alloyed by Copper Effects of different microalgae Botrycoccus sp. Beads concentrations on the growth and nutrients uptake in kitchen wastewater
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1