{"title":"如果竞争和市场管理局是一个表情符号：Meta/Giphy 提供的兼并审批经验教训","authors":"Stephen Dnes, Joseph Day","doi":"10.4337/clj.2023.03.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Merger clearance law relating to large technology companies is increasingly debated. This article considers some of the pertinent analysis from the recent decision of the Competition and Markets Authority to require Meta, which owns Facebook, to divest Giphy despite no such challenge arising in the United States. This engages issues of comity, of jurisdiction and of economic evidence, which are analysed and evaluated in the context of prior UK merger review cases.","PeriodicalId":36415,"journal":{"name":"Competition Law Journal","volume":"19 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"If the Competition and Markets Authority were an emoji: merger clearance lessons from Meta/Giphy\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Dnes, Joseph Day\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/clj.2023.03.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Merger clearance law relating to large technology companies is increasingly debated. This article considers some of the pertinent analysis from the recent decision of the Competition and Markets Authority to require Meta, which owns Facebook, to divest Giphy despite no such challenge arising in the United States. This engages issues of comity, of jurisdiction and of economic evidence, which are analysed and evaluated in the context of prior UK merger review cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Competition Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 42\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Competition Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2023.03.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2023.03.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
与大型科技公司有关的兼并许可法引起了越来越多的争论。本文探讨了竞争与市场管理局最近做出的要求拥有 Facebook 的 Meta 公司剥离 Giphy 的决定中的一些相关分析，尽管在美国并未出现此类挑战。这涉及礼让、管辖权和经济证据等问题，本文结合英国以往的兼并审查案例对这些问题进行了分析和评估。
If the Competition and Markets Authority were an emoji: merger clearance lessons from Meta/Giphy
Merger clearance law relating to large technology companies is increasingly debated. This article considers some of the pertinent analysis from the recent decision of the Competition and Markets Authority to require Meta, which owns Facebook, to divest Giphy despite no such challenge arising in the United States. This engages issues of comity, of jurisdiction and of economic evidence, which are analysed and evaluated in the context of prior UK merger review cases.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
