{"title":"苏格兰下古生界板鳃亚纲棘皮动物 Macrostylocrinus Hall 茎的功能形态","authors":"Stephen K. Donovan","doi":"10.1144/sjg2023-021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Two species of the closely-related monobathrid crinoid from the Lower Palaeozoic of Scotland, namely\n Macrostylocrinus cirrifer\n Ramsbottom (Upper Ordovician, Katian) and\n Macrostylocrinus silurocirrifer\n Brower (Lower Silurian, Telychian), are similar in having elongate, unbranched radices proximally. These were not cirri, as suggested by their names, but were radices which were more or less inflexible, lacking contractile tissues. The function of these radices was uncertain. In the absence of contractile tissues, they could not have been for grasping other upright structures and crinoid do not need help to balance, their posture being maintained by mutable collagenous tissues. It is possible, but unlikely, that they may have acted to direct feeding currents towards the crown. Most probably, in an analogy to the post-Palaeozoic isocrinids, the stem acted like a ‘conveyor belt’, the proximal, radicular and upright part being carried away from the cup as further columnals are inserted, eventually forming a distal, recumbent attachment structure. The elongate radices would have stabilised the dististele, but, unlike isocrinids, the arms of\n Macrostylocrinus\n spp. were not adapted for crawling and thus escaping predators. Both\n M. silurocirrifer\n (type species) and\n M. cirrifer\n are included in\n Macrostylocrinus\n (\n Scotimacrostylocrinus\n ) subgen. nov.\n","PeriodicalId":49556,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Journal of Geology","volume":"13 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional morphology of the stem in the Lower Palaeozoic crinoid\\n Macrostylocrinus\\n Hall from Scotland\",\"authors\":\"Stephen K. Donovan\",\"doi\":\"10.1144/sjg2023-021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Two species of the closely-related monobathrid crinoid from the Lower Palaeozoic of Scotland, namely\\n Macrostylocrinus cirrifer\\n Ramsbottom (Upper Ordovician, Katian) and\\n Macrostylocrinus silurocirrifer\\n Brower (Lower Silurian, Telychian), are similar in having elongate, unbranched radices proximally. These were not cirri, as suggested by their names, but were radices which were more or less inflexible, lacking contractile tissues. The function of these radices was uncertain. In the absence of contractile tissues, they could not have been for grasping other upright structures and crinoid do not need help to balance, their posture being maintained by mutable collagenous tissues. It is possible, but unlikely, that they may have acted to direct feeding currents towards the crown. Most probably, in an analogy to the post-Palaeozoic isocrinids, the stem acted like a ‘conveyor belt’, the proximal, radicular and upright part being carried away from the cup as further columnals are inserted, eventually forming a distal, recumbent attachment structure. The elongate radices would have stabilised the dististele, but, unlike isocrinids, the arms of\\n Macrostylocrinus\\n spp. were not adapted for crawling and thus escaping predators. Both\\n M. silurocirrifer\\n (type species) and\\n M. cirrifer\\n are included in\\n Macrostylocrinus\\n (\\n Scotimacrostylocrinus\\n ) subgen. nov.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":49556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scottish Journal of Geology\",\"volume\":\"13 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scottish Journal of Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1144/sjg2023-021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Journal of Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/sjg2023-021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Functional morphology of the stem in the Lower Palaeozoic crinoid
Macrostylocrinus
Hall from Scotland
Two species of the closely-related monobathrid crinoid from the Lower Palaeozoic of Scotland, namely
Macrostylocrinus cirrifer
Ramsbottom (Upper Ordovician, Katian) and
Macrostylocrinus silurocirrifer
Brower (Lower Silurian, Telychian), are similar in having elongate, unbranched radices proximally. These were not cirri, as suggested by their names, but were radices which were more or less inflexible, lacking contractile tissues. The function of these radices was uncertain. In the absence of contractile tissues, they could not have been for grasping other upright structures and crinoid do not need help to balance, their posture being maintained by mutable collagenous tissues. It is possible, but unlikely, that they may have acted to direct feeding currents towards the crown. Most probably, in an analogy to the post-Palaeozoic isocrinids, the stem acted like a ‘conveyor belt’, the proximal, radicular and upright part being carried away from the cup as further columnals are inserted, eventually forming a distal, recumbent attachment structure. The elongate radices would have stabilised the dististele, but, unlike isocrinids, the arms of
Macrostylocrinus
spp. were not adapted for crawling and thus escaping predators. Both
M. silurocirrifer
(type species) and
M. cirrifer
are included in
Macrostylocrinus
(
Scotimacrostylocrinus
) subgen. nov.
期刊介绍:
Although published only since 1965, the Scottish Journal of Geology has a long pedigree. It is the joint publication of the Geological Society of Glasgow and the Edinburgh Geological Society, which prior to 1965 published separate Transactions: from 1860 in the case of Glasgow and 1863 for Edinburgh.
Traditionally, the Journal has acted as the focus for papers on all aspects of Scottish geology and its contiguous areas, including the surrounding seas. The publication policy has always been outward looking, with the Editors encouraging review papers and papers on broader aspects of the Earth sciences that cannot be discussed solely in terms of Scottish geology.
The diverse geology of Scotland continues to provide an important natural laboratory for the study of earth sciences; many seminal studies in geology have been carried out on Scottish rocks, and over the years the results of much of this work had been published in the Journal and its predecessors.
The Journal fully deserves its high reputation worldwide and intends to maintain its status in the front rank of publications in the Earth sciences.