韩国患者用 Scheimpflug 照相机和 Placido 盘式地形图测量的角膜高阶像差比较

Yeon Ju Lim, Do Hee Jung, K. Pak, Chan-Ho Cho
{"title":"韩国患者用 Scheimpflug 照相机和 Placido 盘式地形图测量的角膜高阶像差比较","authors":"Yeon Ju Lim, Do Hee Jung, K. Pak, Chan-Ho Cho","doi":"10.3341/jkos.2023.64.12.1141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: We compared corneal higher-order aberration (HOA) measurements between the Pentacam® HR (PC), which uses the Scheimpflug principle, and the iTraceTM aberrometer (IT), which evaluates Placido disc topography.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 109 eyes of 87 patients without a history of ocular surface disease during the period from January 2021 to December 2022; both devices were used on the same day. We calculated the root mean square values (μm) of corneal total HOA and of the corneal 3rd- and 4th-order HOA at a pupil diameter of 4 mm. Data were compared by Bland-Altman plots for agreement analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient for correlation analysis.Results: There was no significant difference in the total HOA (p = 0.145), coma (p = 0.309), or secondary astigmatism (p = 0.080) between the PC and IT measurements; all other HOAs significantly differed between devices (p < 0.001). In the correlation analysis, the total HOA (r = 0.605, p < 0.001) and coma (r = 0.634, p < 0.001) were moderately correlated between the two devices; the other HOAs showed low degree of correlations. In the Bland-Altman plot analysis, all HOAs showed low agreement between the two devices.Conclusions: Corneal total HOA and coma measured by the two devices were significantly correlated between the two devices, but other HOAs showed significant differences in measurement and low correlations. Therefore, corneal HOA measurements cannot be interpreted interchangeably between the two devices.","PeriodicalId":17341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Corneal Higher-order Aberrations Measured by Scheimpflug Camera and Placido Disc-based Topography in Korean Patients\",\"authors\":\"Yeon Ju Lim, Do Hee Jung, K. Pak, Chan-Ho Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.3341/jkos.2023.64.12.1141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: We compared corneal higher-order aberration (HOA) measurements between the Pentacam® HR (PC), which uses the Scheimpflug principle, and the iTraceTM aberrometer (IT), which evaluates Placido disc topography.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 109 eyes of 87 patients without a history of ocular surface disease during the period from January 2021 to December 2022; both devices were used on the same day. We calculated the root mean square values (μm) of corneal total HOA and of the corneal 3rd- and 4th-order HOA at a pupil diameter of 4 mm. Data were compared by Bland-Altman plots for agreement analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient for correlation analysis.Results: There was no significant difference in the total HOA (p = 0.145), coma (p = 0.309), or secondary astigmatism (p = 0.080) between the PC and IT measurements; all other HOAs significantly differed between devices (p < 0.001). In the correlation analysis, the total HOA (r = 0.605, p < 0.001) and coma (r = 0.634, p < 0.001) were moderately correlated between the two devices; the other HOAs showed low degree of correlations. In the Bland-Altman plot analysis, all HOAs showed low agreement between the two devices.Conclusions: Corneal total HOA and coma measured by the two devices were significantly correlated between the two devices, but other HOAs showed significant differences in measurement and low correlations. Therefore, corneal HOA measurements cannot be interpreted interchangeably between the two devices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2023.64.12.1141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2023.64.12.1141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们比较了使用Scheimpflug原理的Pentacam® HR(PC)和评估Placido圆盘地形图的iTraceTM像差仪(IT)的角膜高阶像差(HOA)测量结果:我们回顾性地分析了 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间 87 位无眼表疾病史患者的 109 只眼睛,两种设备均在同一天使用。我们计算了瞳孔直径为 4 毫米时角膜总 HOA 以及角膜三阶和四阶 HOA 的均方根值 (μm)。数据比较采用布兰-阿尔特曼图(Bland-Altman plots)进行一致性分析,采用皮尔逊相关系数(Pearson correlation coefficient)进行相关性分析:PC和IT测量的总HOA(p = 0.145)、昏迷(p = 0.309)或二次散光(p = 0.080)无明显差异;所有其他HOA在不同设备间均有明显差异(p < 0.001)。在相关性分析中,两种设备之间的总 HOA(r = 0.605,p < 0.001)和昏迷(r = 0.634,p < 0.001)呈中度相关;其他 HOA 的相关性较低。在Bland-Altman图分析中,两台设备的所有HOA都显示出较低的一致性:结论:两台设备测量的角膜总HOA和昏迷在两台设备之间有显著相关性,但其他HOA的测量结果显示出显著差异,相关性较低。因此,两种设备的角膜 HOA 测量结果不能互换解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Corneal Higher-order Aberrations Measured by Scheimpflug Camera and Placido Disc-based Topography in Korean Patients
Purpose: We compared corneal higher-order aberration (HOA) measurements between the Pentacam® HR (PC), which uses the Scheimpflug principle, and the iTraceTM aberrometer (IT), which evaluates Placido disc topography.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 109 eyes of 87 patients without a history of ocular surface disease during the period from January 2021 to December 2022; both devices were used on the same day. We calculated the root mean square values (μm) of corneal total HOA and of the corneal 3rd- and 4th-order HOA at a pupil diameter of 4 mm. Data were compared by Bland-Altman plots for agreement analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient for correlation analysis.Results: There was no significant difference in the total HOA (p = 0.145), coma (p = 0.309), or secondary astigmatism (p = 0.080) between the PC and IT measurements; all other HOAs significantly differed between devices (p < 0.001). In the correlation analysis, the total HOA (r = 0.605, p < 0.001) and coma (r = 0.634, p < 0.001) were moderately correlated between the two devices; the other HOAs showed low degree of correlations. In the Bland-Altman plot analysis, all HOAs showed low agreement between the two devices.Conclusions: Corneal total HOA and coma measured by the two devices were significantly correlated between the two devices, but other HOAs showed significant differences in measurement and low correlations. Therefore, corneal HOA measurements cannot be interpreted interchangeably between the two devices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
期刊最新文献
Self-assessment of Visual Acuity Using a Smartphone Application The Diagnosis and Treatment of a Post-traumatic Iris Cyst Referred as an Iris Tumor Clinical Results of Prosthetic Eye Wear in Patients with Congenital Microphthalmos Two Cases of Ischemic Optic Neuropathy after Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Injection Frequency and Differences in Visual Outcomes based on Diagnosis Year in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1