比利时庇护程序中医疗法律报告的使用情况

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY European Journal of Migration and Law Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1163/15718166-12340163
Alice Sinon, Julie Lejeune
{"title":"比利时庇护程序中医疗法律报告的使用情况","authors":"Alice Sinon, Julie Lejeune","doi":"10.1163/15718166-12340163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the asylum processes, medical documents are frequently used to establish a need for international protection. These include medico-legal reports written under the Istanbul Protocol. Their objective is to prove past persecution (e.g. torture) and/or specific vulnerability/ies, which should be taken into account in the procedure as well as in the assessment of the protection needs.</p><p>Firstly, the applicable international and EU legal framework and existing ECtHR case law are briefly analysed. Secondly, a study of Belgian asylum authorities and Courts’ practices, based on the analysis of individual cases, and on interviews carried out with victims of torture, shows that the weight given by asylum authorities to these documents varies. There is a lack of consistency in the practice in particular regarding their probative value. The article analyses in detail trends in the case-law and the reasonings put forward. Lastly, the article discusses how medical documents, by identifying and documenting vulnerabilities, can contribute to the consideration of all vulnerabilities from an intersectional perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":51819,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Migration and Law","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Medico-Legal Reports in Asylum Processes in Belgium\",\"authors\":\"Alice Sinon, Julie Lejeune\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718166-12340163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the asylum processes, medical documents are frequently used to establish a need for international protection. These include medico-legal reports written under the Istanbul Protocol. Their objective is to prove past persecution (e.g. torture) and/or specific vulnerability/ies, which should be taken into account in the procedure as well as in the assessment of the protection needs.</p><p>Firstly, the applicable international and EU legal framework and existing ECtHR case law are briefly analysed. Secondly, a study of Belgian asylum authorities and Courts’ practices, based on the analysis of individual cases, and on interviews carried out with victims of torture, shows that the weight given by asylum authorities to these documents varies. There is a lack of consistency in the practice in particular regarding their probative value. The article analyses in detail trends in the case-law and the reasonings put forward. Lastly, the article discusses how medical documents, by identifying and documenting vulnerabilities, can contribute to the consideration of all vulnerabilities from an intersectional perspective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Migration and Law\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Migration and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340163\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Migration and Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在庇护程序中,医疗文件经常被用来确定是否需要国际保护。这些文件包括根据《伊斯坦布尔议定书》撰写的医疗法律报告。首先,简要分析了适用的国际和欧盟法律框架以及欧洲人权法院的现有判例法。其次,根据对个案的分析和对酷刑受害者的访谈,对比利时庇护当局和法院的做法进行了研究,结果表明庇护当局对这些文件的重视程度各不相同。特别是在其证明价值方面,做法缺乏一致性。文章详细分析了判例法的趋势和提出的理由。最后,文章讨论了医疗文件如何通过确定和记录脆弱性,从交叉角度促进对所有脆弱性的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Use of Medico-Legal Reports in Asylum Processes in Belgium

In the asylum processes, medical documents are frequently used to establish a need for international protection. These include medico-legal reports written under the Istanbul Protocol. Their objective is to prove past persecution (e.g. torture) and/or specific vulnerability/ies, which should be taken into account in the procedure as well as in the assessment of the protection needs.

Firstly, the applicable international and EU legal framework and existing ECtHR case law are briefly analysed. Secondly, a study of Belgian asylum authorities and Courts’ practices, based on the analysis of individual cases, and on interviews carried out with victims of torture, shows that the weight given by asylum authorities to these documents varies. There is a lack of consistency in the practice in particular regarding their probative value. The article analyses in detail trends in the case-law and the reasonings put forward. Lastly, the article discusses how medical documents, by identifying and documenting vulnerabilities, can contribute to the consideration of all vulnerabilities from an intersectional perspective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Migration and Law is a quarterly journal on migration law and policy with specific emphasis on the European Union, the Council of Europe and migration activities within the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe. This journal differs from other migration journals by focusing on both the law and policy within the field of migration, as opposed to examining immigration and migration policies from a wholly sociological perspective. The Journal is the initiative of the Centre for Migration Law of the University of Nijmegen, in co-operation with the Brussels-based Migration Policy Group.
期刊最新文献
The ‘Border Security’ Concept in EU Law EU Boots on the Ground and Effective Judicial Protection against Frontex’s Operational Powers in Return: Lessons from Case T‑600/21 When Do Union Citizens and Their Families Have the Right to Equal Treatment on Grounds of Nationality in EU Law? The Fiction of Non-entry in European Migration Law: Its Implications on the Rights of Asylum Seekers and Irregular Migrants at European Borders Derogations in Exchange of Increased Responsibility: How Can This Fix the Broken Promise for More Solidarity in the EU?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1