重新设计第一次产前检查:质量改进计划。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-06 DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000418
Diane Christopher, Joellen Fresia, Jennifer Alexander, Kristin Krenz, Heather Aldrich, Karen Hampanda
{"title":"重新设计第一次产前检查:质量改进计划。","authors":"Diane Christopher, Joellen Fresia, Jennifer Alexander, Kristin Krenz, Heather Aldrich, Karen Hampanda","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>In an era of rising maternal mortality, a thorough first prenatal visit is essential; however, in our clinic we confirmed that many important topics were not being addressed. To rectify this problem, we redesigned the first prenatal visit to improve the coverage of topics, collect social determinants of health, increase patient access, and maintain patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a quality improvement project to improve the first prenatal visit in a faculty obstetrics and gynecology clinic. To assess effectiveness, data before and after the implementation were compared. The intervention divided the first prenatal visit into two patient encounters: a nurse-led telemedicine visit and an in-person visit with an obstetric clinician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median percentage of topics covered in the first prenatal visit increased from 70.0% to 95.6%, and improvements were observed for all key themes ( p < .001). Social determinants of health was routinely collected postintervention (98.8%). A reduction in no-shows (9.9%-4.2%) improved patient access for all patients. Patient satisfaction for the first prenatal visit remained unchanged ( p = .370).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant improvements in addressing important topics at the first prenatal visit are achievable by separating one prenatal visit into two visits while increasing patient access and maintaining high patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":"119-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redesigning the First Prenatal Visit: A Quality Improvement Initiative.\",\"authors\":\"Diane Christopher, Joellen Fresia, Jennifer Alexander, Kristin Krenz, Heather Aldrich, Karen Hampanda\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>In an era of rising maternal mortality, a thorough first prenatal visit is essential; however, in our clinic we confirmed that many important topics were not being addressed. To rectify this problem, we redesigned the first prenatal visit to improve the coverage of topics, collect social determinants of health, increase patient access, and maintain patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a quality improvement project to improve the first prenatal visit in a faculty obstetrics and gynecology clinic. To assess effectiveness, data before and after the implementation were compared. The intervention divided the first prenatal visit into two patient encounters: a nurse-led telemedicine visit and an in-person visit with an obstetric clinician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median percentage of topics covered in the first prenatal visit increased from 70.0% to 95.6%, and improvements were observed for all key themes ( p < .001). Social determinants of health was routinely collected postintervention (98.8%). A reduction in no-shows (9.9%-4.2%) improved patient access for all patients. Patient satisfaction for the first prenatal visit remained unchanged ( p = .370).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant improvements in addressing important topics at the first prenatal visit are achievable by separating one prenatal visit into two visits while increasing patient access and maintaining high patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"119-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000418\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:在孕产妇死亡率不断上升的时代,彻底的首次产前检查至关重要;然而,在我们的诊所,我们证实许多重要的问题都没有得到解决。为了纠正这一问题,我们重新设计了首次产前检查,以提高检查项目的覆盖面、收集健康的社会决定因素、增加患者就诊机会并保持患者满意度:方法:我们设计了一个质量改进项目,以改进妇产科教师诊所的首次产前检查。为了评估效果,我们对实施前后的数据进行了比较。干预措施将首次产前检查分为两次:一次是由护士主导的远程医疗检查,另一次是产科临床医生的面诊:结果:第一次产前检查所涵盖主题的中位百分比从 70.0% 提高到 95.6%,所有关键主题均有所改善(p < .001)。干预后常规收集了健康的社会决定因素(98.8%)。未就诊率下降(9.9%-4.2%),改善了所有患者的就诊情况。患者对首次产前检查的满意度保持不变(p = .370):结论:通过将一次产前检查分为两次,可显著改善首次产前检查中重要问题的处理,同时提高患者就诊率并保持较高的患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Redesigning the First Prenatal Visit: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Background/purpose: In an era of rising maternal mortality, a thorough first prenatal visit is essential; however, in our clinic we confirmed that many important topics were not being addressed. To rectify this problem, we redesigned the first prenatal visit to improve the coverage of topics, collect social determinants of health, increase patient access, and maintain patient satisfaction.

Methods: We designed a quality improvement project to improve the first prenatal visit in a faculty obstetrics and gynecology clinic. To assess effectiveness, data before and after the implementation were compared. The intervention divided the first prenatal visit into two patient encounters: a nurse-led telemedicine visit and an in-person visit with an obstetric clinician.

Results: The median percentage of topics covered in the first prenatal visit increased from 70.0% to 95.6%, and improvements were observed for all key themes ( p < .001). Social determinants of health was routinely collected postintervention (98.8%). A reduction in no-shows (9.9%-4.2%) improved patient access for all patients. Patient satisfaction for the first prenatal visit remained unchanged ( p = .370).

Conclusions: Significant improvements in addressing important topics at the first prenatal visit are achievable by separating one prenatal visit into two visits while increasing patient access and maintaining high patient satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
期刊最新文献
Implementation of an Evidence-Based Treatment Protocol and Order Set for Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome. Improving Time to Antibiotics for Long-Bone Open Fractures: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Increasing Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in Resident-Run Clinic Through Partnership With Ophthalmology Clinic: A Pilot Study. Collaboration to Remove Barriers to Pump Integration With the Electronic Health Record. The Use of a Single Risk Assessment Tool for Mortality and Numerous Hospital-Acquired Conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1