区分青少年和年轻成人癌症患者基于性别的生殖问题:混合方法研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1080/07347332.2023.2291798
Chiu Yi Tan, Nina Francis-Levin, Daria Stelmak, Nicholas T Iannarino, Anao Zhang, Lindsey Herrel, Erin Ellman, Emily Walling, Molly B Moravek, Rashmi Chugh, Brad Zebrack
{"title":"区分青少年和年轻成人癌症患者基于性别的生殖问题:混合方法研究。","authors":"Chiu Yi Tan, Nina Francis-Levin, Daria Stelmak, Nicholas T Iannarino, Anao Zhang, Lindsey Herrel, Erin Ellman, Emily Walling, Molly B Moravek, Rashmi Chugh, Brad Zebrack","doi":"10.1080/07347332.2023.2291798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Few studies have examined the distinct reproductive concerns (RC) of men and women in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patient population. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore and differentiate the RC of AYAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants completed the Reproductive Concerns After Cancer (RCAC) scale and participated in a semistructured interview. Interviews were deductively coded based on an analytic schema derived from the RCAC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After identifying participants through the electronic health record, 27 younger AYAs, ages 12-25, enrolled in the study. Four inductive themes emerged and differed by gender. These include differential temporality, acceptance, and openness to alternatives, partner influence, and parental/guardian influence. AYA men reported fewer RC (<i>M</i> = 49.4, <i>SD</i> = 9.6) compared to AYA women (<i>M</i> = 56.8, <i>SD</i> = 8.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oncofertility care providers are advised to account for short- and long-ranging concerns based on AYAs' gender. Future evaluations of patient-reported outcome measures specific to AYA RC are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":47451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"526-542"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiating gender-based reproductive concerns among adolescent and young adult cancer patients: A mixed methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Chiu Yi Tan, Nina Francis-Levin, Daria Stelmak, Nicholas T Iannarino, Anao Zhang, Lindsey Herrel, Erin Ellman, Emily Walling, Molly B Moravek, Rashmi Chugh, Brad Zebrack\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07347332.2023.2291798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Few studies have examined the distinct reproductive concerns (RC) of men and women in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patient population. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore and differentiate the RC of AYAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants completed the Reproductive Concerns After Cancer (RCAC) scale and participated in a semistructured interview. Interviews were deductively coded based on an analytic schema derived from the RCAC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After identifying participants through the electronic health record, 27 younger AYAs, ages 12-25, enrolled in the study. Four inductive themes emerged and differed by gender. These include differential temporality, acceptance, and openness to alternatives, partner influence, and parental/guardian influence. AYA men reported fewer RC (<i>M</i> = 49.4, <i>SD</i> = 9.6) compared to AYA women (<i>M</i> = 56.8, <i>SD</i> = 8.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oncofertility care providers are advised to account for short- and long-ranging concerns based on AYAs' gender. Future evaluations of patient-reported outcome measures specific to AYA RC are recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"526-542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2023.2291798\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2023.2291798","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:很少有研究对青少年和年轻成人(AYA)癌症患者群体中男性和女性不同的生殖问题(RC)进行研究。这项混合方法研究的目的是探索和区分青少年和青年癌症患者的生殖关注问题:方法:参与者填写癌症后生殖关注量表(RCAC),并参加半结构式访谈。根据 RCAC 得出的分析模式对访谈进行演绎编码:通过电子健康记录确定参与者后,27 名年龄在 12-25 岁之间的年轻青壮年参加了研究。研究中出现了四个归纳主题,并因性别而异。这些主题包括不同的时间性、对替代方案的接受和开放性、伴侣的影响以及父母/监护人的影响。与年轻女性(M = 56.8,SD = 8.4)相比,年轻男性报告的 RC 较少(M = 49.4,SD = 9.6):建议肿瘤不孕不育治疗提供者根据亚健康人群的性别,考虑其短期和长期的担忧。建议今后对专门针对青壮年生殖中心的患者报告结果指标进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differentiating gender-based reproductive concerns among adolescent and young adult cancer patients: A mixed methods study.

Introduction: Few studies have examined the distinct reproductive concerns (RC) of men and women in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patient population. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore and differentiate the RC of AYAs.

Methods: Participants completed the Reproductive Concerns After Cancer (RCAC) scale and participated in a semistructured interview. Interviews were deductively coded based on an analytic schema derived from the RCAC.

Results: After identifying participants through the electronic health record, 27 younger AYAs, ages 12-25, enrolled in the study. Four inductive themes emerged and differed by gender. These include differential temporality, acceptance, and openness to alternatives, partner influence, and parental/guardian influence. AYA men reported fewer RC (M = 49.4, SD = 9.6) compared to AYA women (M = 56.8, SD = 8.4).

Conclusions: Oncofertility care providers are advised to account for short- and long-ranging concerns based on AYAs' gender. Future evaluations of patient-reported outcome measures specific to AYA RC are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Here is your single source of integrated information on providing the best psychosocial care possible from the knowledge available from many disciplines.The Journal of Psychosocial Oncology is an essential source for up-to-date clinical and research material geared toward health professionals who provide psychosocial services to cancer patients, their families, and their caregivers. The journal—the first interdisciplinary resource of its kind—is in its third decade of examining exploratory and hypothesis testing and presenting program evaluation research on critical areas, including: the stigma of cancer; employment and personal problems facing cancer patients; patient education.
期刊最新文献
Correction. Understanding the patient-spouse communication experience during chemotherapy for gastric cancer: A qualitative study. Quality of life and unmet needs of late-stage and metastatic colorectal cancer survivors: An integrative review. The meaning-making process in the re-entry phase: A qualitative focus group study with patients treated for breast cancer or melanoma. Adaptation and feasibility of the Swedish Promoting Resilience in Stress Management intervention targeting adolescents and young adults newly diagnosed with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1