{"title":"现代概念是欧洲传统的 \"永恒现代性\"，还是新时代的创造？","authors":"Victoria Shamray","doi":"10.31649/sent13.02.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article devoted to the discussion of the thesis that the conception of the modernity with typical for it controversy between “old and modern” is not a specific trait of new times cultural situation and enlightenment conscience. Enough grounds for the consideration of it as a fundamental element of European tradition since the time of late antiquity. The peculiarity of its importance in Modern Time first of all consists of the secularization of reality due to which other articulations of temporal dispositions appears. For defining of the modernity, the decisive socio-cultural characteristics are of no great importance (according to which “the historical period” of Modern Time is separated), but temporal structure of being is.","PeriodicalId":37673,"journal":{"name":"Sententiae","volume":"72 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the concept of the modern an “alwaysmodernity” of European tradition or the New time creation?\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Shamray\",\"doi\":\"10.31649/sent13.02.132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article devoted to the discussion of the thesis that the conception of the modernity with typical for it controversy between “old and modern” is not a specific trait of new times cultural situation and enlightenment conscience. Enough grounds for the consideration of it as a fundamental element of European tradition since the time of late antiquity. The peculiarity of its importance in Modern Time first of all consists of the secularization of reality due to which other articulations of temporal dispositions appears. For defining of the modernity, the decisive socio-cultural characteristics are of no great importance (according to which “the historical period” of Modern Time is separated), but temporal structure of being is.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sententiae\",\"volume\":\"72 16\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sententiae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31649/sent13.02.132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sententiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31649/sent13.02.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is the concept of the modern an “alwaysmodernity” of European tradition or the New time creation?
The article devoted to the discussion of the thesis that the conception of the modernity with typical for it controversy between “old and modern” is not a specific trait of new times cultural situation and enlightenment conscience. Enough grounds for the consideration of it as a fundamental element of European tradition since the time of late antiquity. The peculiarity of its importance in Modern Time first of all consists of the secularization of reality due to which other articulations of temporal dispositions appears. For defining of the modernity, the decisive socio-cultural characteristics are of no great importance (according to which “the historical period” of Modern Time is separated), but temporal structure of being is.
期刊介绍：
Sententiae is historico-philosophical open access journal. Journal created by Modern philosophy''s research group (Pascalian society). Founded in 2000. Published twice a year, in June and December. Our purpose is to foster the development of a wide gamut of contemporary approaches, active implementation of them into research practice, and establishment of high standards of teaching philosophy basing on the achievements of contemporary history of philosophy. Our key priority is to ensure the empirical substantiation of historico-philosophical conceptions, basing on the criteria of literality, exhaustivity, contextuality and taking into account the existing speculative interpretations. Jean-Luc Marion was the first to formulate this set of criteria in 1998 as the main features of contemporary researches of Descartes''s philosophy. We regard these principles as the methodological background of any substantiated research method in the history of philosophy. Publishing materials on all historico-philosophical topics, we pay special attention to researches in terminology, issues of philosophical translation and untranslatability, manuscript researches (including handwritten heritage of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy professors of ХVІІ–ХVІІІ century), and cover the development of large-scale projects in this area. We also publish new bilingual and commented Ukrainian translations of classical foreign philosophical texts. Among our priorities there is also a coverage of the history of philosophical thought in Ukraine and other Eastern European countries and its relations to the wider cultural context (theology, literature, natural sciences, political ideology etc). The content of each issue is distributed according to Genre Sections and Thematic Headings. Currently there are 10 Genre Sections.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
