泔水收集与泔水处理机:葡萄牙城市案例研究

IF 1.2 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Detritus Pub Date : 2023-12-31 DOI:10.31025/2611-4135/2023.18326
Pedro Melo Rodrigues, Ricardo Rodrigues, Fátima David, Nuno Melo, Elisabete Soares
{"title":"泔水收集与泔水处理机:葡萄牙城市案例研究","authors":"Pedro Melo Rodrigues, Ricardo Rodrigues, Fátima David, Nuno Melo, Elisabete Soares","doi":"10.31025/2611-4135/2023.18326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Union (EU) prioritises sustainable development and aims to achieve climate neutrality by 2050 through investments in green technologies and a legislative climate framework. Waste collection and treatment systems, including biowaste like food waste, protect natural capital and citizens' well-being. Directive 2008/98/EC defines biowaste and sets the stage for exploring alternative solutions. This study focuses on the city of Guarda (Portugal) and analyses the use of disposers for food waste treatment. By comparing storage/collection systems with disposers regarding environmental and economic costs and benefits, the study aims to determine the most effective solution for collecting food waste. The analysis utilises a simulator provided by the Portuguese Fundo Ambiental®. The results show that while operating costs are higher for food waste collection systems, disposers require a more significant initial investment. Nevertheless, the cost-benefit ratio favours disposers, while the net present value analysis suggests that the food waste collection system is more favourable. Additionally, food waste collection systems contribute to higher greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per tonne of food waste compared to using disposers.","PeriodicalId":44191,"journal":{"name":"Detritus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food waste collection versus food waste disposers: A case study of a Portuguese city\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Melo Rodrigues, Ricardo Rodrigues, Fátima David, Nuno Melo, Elisabete Soares\",\"doi\":\"10.31025/2611-4135/2023.18326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The European Union (EU) prioritises sustainable development and aims to achieve climate neutrality by 2050 through investments in green technologies and a legislative climate framework. Waste collection and treatment systems, including biowaste like food waste, protect natural capital and citizens' well-being. Directive 2008/98/EC defines biowaste and sets the stage for exploring alternative solutions. This study focuses on the city of Guarda (Portugal) and analyses the use of disposers for food waste treatment. By comparing storage/collection systems with disposers regarding environmental and economic costs and benefits, the study aims to determine the most effective solution for collecting food waste. The analysis utilises a simulator provided by the Portuguese Fundo Ambiental®. The results show that while operating costs are higher for food waste collection systems, disposers require a more significant initial investment. Nevertheless, the cost-benefit ratio favours disposers, while the net present value analysis suggests that the food waste collection system is more favourable. Additionally, food waste collection systems contribute to higher greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per tonne of food waste compared to using disposers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Detritus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Detritus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2023.18326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Detritus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2023.18326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲联盟(欧盟)将可持续发展作为优先事项,并旨在通过投资绿色技术和立法气候框架,到 2050 年实现气候中和。废物收集和处理系统,包括食物垃圾等生物废物,可保护自然资本和公民的福祉。第 2008/98/EC 号指令对生物垃圾进行了定义,并为探索替代解决方案奠定了基础。本研究以葡萄牙瓜尔达市为重点,分析了使用处理器处理食物垃圾的情况。通过比较储存/收集系统与处理机在环境和经济成本及效益方面的差异,该研究旨在确定收集食物垃圾的最有效解决方案。分析使用了葡萄牙 Fundo Ambiental® 提供的模拟器。结果表明,虽然食物垃圾收集系统的运营成本较高,但垃圾处理器需要更多的初始投资。不过,从成本效益比来看,食物垃圾处理器更有优势,而净现值分析表明,食物垃圾收集系统更有优势。此外,与使用处理器相比,泔水收集系统每吨泔水的温室气体排放量更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Food waste collection versus food waste disposers: A case study of a Portuguese city
The European Union (EU) prioritises sustainable development and aims to achieve climate neutrality by 2050 through investments in green technologies and a legislative climate framework. Waste collection and treatment systems, including biowaste like food waste, protect natural capital and citizens' well-being. Directive 2008/98/EC defines biowaste and sets the stage for exploring alternative solutions. This study focuses on the city of Guarda (Portugal) and analyses the use of disposers for food waste treatment. By comparing storage/collection systems with disposers regarding environmental and economic costs and benefits, the study aims to determine the most effective solution for collecting food waste. The analysis utilises a simulator provided by the Portuguese Fundo Ambiental®. The results show that while operating costs are higher for food waste collection systems, disposers require a more significant initial investment. Nevertheless, the cost-benefit ratio favours disposers, while the net present value analysis suggests that the food waste collection system is more favourable. Additionally, food waste collection systems contribute to higher greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per tonne of food waste compared to using disposers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Detritus
Detritus ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
45
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
CIRCULAR ECONOMY: AN HONEST APPROACH BOOKS REVIEW Detritus & Art THE PRESENCE OF PFAS IN WASTES AND RELATED IMPLICATIONS ON THE CURRENT AND PROPOSED EUROPEAN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: A SYSTEMATIC CRITICAL REVIEW WASTE EGGSHELLS AS CATALYSTS: AN ENVIRONMENTALLY-FRIENDLY APPROACH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1