长期交通规划图示指南

Rachel F. Peterson, G. Newmark
{"title":"长期交通规划图示指南","authors":"Rachel F. Peterson, G. Newmark","doi":"10.1177/03611981231212166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For more than a half century, federal policy has required metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) to communicate regional priorities through long-range transportation plans (LRTPs). Despite the length of that requirement and the high cost of the associated investments, there are virtually no resources to guide MPOs in graphically communicating these plans to the public. This research reviews 1,502 graphics from a stratified random sample of LRTPs from 20 MPOs across the United States with populations less than 200,000. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted to assess current graphic practices and generate suggestions to guide MPOs in enhancing graphic communication. This review categorizes LRTP graphics into three types (spatial, numeric, and concept), identifies the frequency, components, and uses of each type, and then proposes a set of 26 “core” graphics as a common baseline for all LRTPs.","PeriodicalId":309251,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Graphic Guidance for Long-Range Transportation Plans\",\"authors\":\"Rachel F. Peterson, G. Newmark\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03611981231212166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For more than a half century, federal policy has required metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) to communicate regional priorities through long-range transportation plans (LRTPs). Despite the length of that requirement and the high cost of the associated investments, there are virtually no resources to guide MPOs in graphically communicating these plans to the public. This research reviews 1,502 graphics from a stratified random sample of LRTPs from 20 MPOs across the United States with populations less than 200,000. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted to assess current graphic practices and generate suggestions to guide MPOs in enhancing graphic communication. This review categorizes LRTP graphics into three types (spatial, numeric, and concept), identifies the frequency, components, and uses of each type, and then proposes a set of 26 “core” graphics as a common baseline for all LRTPs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231212166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231212166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

半个多世纪以来,联邦政策一直要求大都市规划组织(MPOs)通过长期交通规划(LRTPs)传达区域优先事项。尽管这一要求持续时间很长,相关投资成本也很高,但几乎没有任何资源可以指导大都市规划组织以图形方式向公众传达这些计划。本研究审查了来自全美 20 个人口不足 20 万的 MPO 的分层随机抽样 LRTPs 中的 1,502 幅图表。研究人员进行了定量和定性分析,以评估当前的图形实践,并提出建议,指导 MPO 加强图形沟通。本次审查将 LRTP 图形分为三种类型(空间、数字和概念),确定了每种类型的频率、组成部分和用途,然后提出了一套 26 个 "核心 "图形,作为所有 LRTP 的共同基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Graphic Guidance for Long-Range Transportation Plans
For more than a half century, federal policy has required metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) to communicate regional priorities through long-range transportation plans (LRTPs). Despite the length of that requirement and the high cost of the associated investments, there are virtually no resources to guide MPOs in graphically communicating these plans to the public. This research reviews 1,502 graphics from a stratified random sample of LRTPs from 20 MPOs across the United States with populations less than 200,000. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted to assess current graphic practices and generate suggestions to guide MPOs in enhancing graphic communication. This review categorizes LRTP graphics into three types (spatial, numeric, and concept), identifies the frequency, components, and uses of each type, and then proposes a set of 26 “core” graphics as a common baseline for all LRTPs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatic Traffic Safety Analysis using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Technology at Unsignalized Intersections in Heterogeneous Traffic Role of Bystanders on Women’s Perception of Personal Security When Using Public Transport Comprehensive Investigation of Pedestrian Hit-and-Run Crashes: Applying XGBoost and Binary Logistic Regression Model Insights for Sustainable Urban Transport via Private Charging Pile Sharing in the Electric Vehicle Sector Correlates of Modal Substitution and Induced Travel of Ridehailing in California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1